Abstract
Educational Technology (ETEC) professionals in the United States (US) fill multiple roles in public school systems. While these roles can be classified into broad categories, what remains unclear are the expectations and priorities for the completion of these roles and the tasks associated within each role category. In order for ETEC professionals to be successful, they need clear guidance on what their performance expectations and prioritized roles should be. This research seeks to add clarity regarding expectations by surveying K-12 building administrators to identify perceptions of ETEC professionals within their schools regarding their actual and ideal performances relative to eight role categories. Results indicate that these US building administrators place high importance on the Technological and Administrative Communication categories. The data also show that there is a significant gap between the ideal and actual performance expectations of ETEC professionals in all eight role categories, but most demonstrably within the Instructional Support and Teaching/Training categories. Results also signal the desire for ETEC professionals to focus more on training and collaboration with teachers regarding technology integration within classrooms. This suggests that administrators want ETEC professionals to complete more instructional tasks than they currently perform. Findings from this study hold implications for the training of ETEC professionals and can potentially inform the curriculum of educational technology preparation programs in the US and beyond.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, H. (2003). Successful K-12 technology planning: Ten essential elements. Teacher Librarian, 31(1), 22.
Davidson, J. (2003). A new role in facilitating school reform: The case of the educational technologist. Teachers College Record, 105(5), 729–752.
Devolder, A., Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Identifying multiple roles of ICT coordinators. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1651–1655.
Digest of Educational Statistics (2016). Table 218.10: Number and internet access of instructional computers and rooms in public schools, by selected school characteristics. Resource document. National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_218.10.asp?current=yes. Accessed 4 Aug 2016.
Fishman, B. J., & Pinkard, N. (2001). Bringing urban schools into the information age: Planning for technology vs. technology planning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(1), 63–80.
Haynes, L. L., Baylen, D. M., An, Y. J., Bradford, G., & d’Alba, A. (2014). Learning assessments and program evaluation connected to ISTE standards for coaches: preparing instructional technology coaches for K-12 teachers. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2014(1) (pp 1764–1767).
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.
Hohlfeld, T. N., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Barron, A. E. (2010). Connecting schools, community, and family with ICT: Four-year trends related to school level and SES of public schools in Florida. Computers & Education, 55(1), 391–405.
ISTE Standards (2016). Retrieved July 20, 2016, from http://www.iste.org/standards/standards.
Lai, K. W., & Pratt, K. (2004). Information and communication technology (ICT) in secondary schools: The role of the computer coordinator. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 461–475.
Margerum-Leys, J., & Marx, R. (2002). Teacher knowledge of educational technology: A case study of student/mentor teacher pairs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(4), 427–462.
Moursund, D. (1992). The technology coordinator. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2015). 2015 professional standards for educational leaders. http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2015/ProfessionalStandardsforEducationalLeaders2015forNPBEAFINAL.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2017.
Rath, A., & Rieck, W. A. (1997). Five strategies for district computer coordinators to fund and manage a transition to technology-run learning environments. THE Journal, 25(4), 51.
Richardson, J. W., McLeod, S., Flora, K., Sauers, N. J., Kannan, S., & Sincar, M. (2013). Large-scale 1:1 computing initiatives: An open access database. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 9(1), 4–18.
Rodríguez-Miranda, F. P., Pozuelos-Estrada, F. J., & León-Jariego, J. C. (2014). The role of ICT coordinator. Priority and time dedicated to professional functions. Computers & Education, 72, 262–270.
State Educational Technology Directors Association (2006). SETDA national leadership summit toolkit 2006. https://web.archive.org/web/20130813164341/http://setda.org/toolkit/nlitoolkit2006/executivesummary/index.htm. Accessed 21 Feb 2017.
Sugar, W., & Holloman, H. (2009). Acknowledging the leadership role of a technology coordinator. TechTrends, 53(6), 67.
Tondeur, J., Cooper, M., & Newhouse, C. P. (2010). From ICT coordination to ICT integration: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 296–306.
Whitehead, B. M., Jensen, D. F., & Boschee, F. (2013). Planning for technology: a guide for school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOC 34 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, C.A., Allred, J.B. & Brescia, W.F. The role of educational technology professionals as perceived by building administrators. Educ Inf Technol 23, 179–191 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9593-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9593-2