Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using concept mapping to improve poor readers’ understanding of expository text

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined whether the use of concept mapping is more effective in teaching expository material in comparison to a traditional, lecture only, approach. Its objective was threefold. First, to determine if multimedia concept mapping produces differential learning outcomes compared to digital text-based concept mapping. Secondly, to compare the above experimental approaches to traditional teaching and finally to demonstrate if there are significant differences in the level of satisfaction reported by children under the three instructional approaches used. Thirty fifth grade children participated from which three groups of poor readers were formed, matched on age, gender and reading ability. The two experimental groups were taught with the use of digital text-based and multimedia concept maps respectively and the control group was subjected to the traditional teaching method of expository material. Each group had three sessions of instruction on three different expository texts. The results indicated that concept mapping can be an effective means for teaching expository content. However, there were no differential learning outcomes when adding multimedia elements to concept maps. Moderate satisfaction was reported for all three approaches. The findings coincide with the body of literature emphasizing the importance of concept mapping in the learning and instruction of children with reading difficulties. The study’s results inform potential educators on the use of multimedia with poor readers in elementary school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adesope, O., Cavagnetto, A., Hunsu, N., Anguiano, C., & Lloyd, J. (2016). Comparative effects of computer-based concept maps, refutational texts, and expository texts on science learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, L. (2000). Effect size calculators.http://www.uccs.edu/~lbecker/

  • Berkeley, S., Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities 1995-2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 423–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. (2004). Reading next-a vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of new York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. R. (1996). The effects of a cognitive mapping strategy on the literal and inferential comprehension of students with mild disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 19, 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K., Sung, Y., & Chen, I. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciullo, S., Falcomata, T. S., Pfannenstiel, K., & Billingsley, G. (2015). Improving learning with science and social studies text using computer-based concept maps for students with disabilities. Behavior Modification, 39(1), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciullo, S., & Reutebuch, C. (2013). Computer-based graphic organizers for students with LD: A systematic review of literature. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 38(4), 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Czerniak, C. M., & Haney, J. J. (1998). The effect of collaborative concept mapping on elementary preservice teachers’ anxiety, efficacy and achievement in physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(4), 303–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E., & Chall, J. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton, C., Fletcher, J., Anthony, J., & Francis, D. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention of students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 447–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diakidoy, I. (2014). The effects of familiarization with oral expository text on listening and reading comprehension levels. Reading Psychology, 35, 622–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diakidoy, I., Stylianou, P., Karefilillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26, 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension control and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriadi, Y. (2001). Evaluating the use of multimedia authoring with dyslexic learners: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. A., & Jessup, L. M. (2004). The power and benefits of concept mapping: Measuring use, usefulness, ease of use and satisfaction. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajria, M., Jitendra, A., Sacks, G., & Sood, S. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guastello, E. F., Beasley, T. M., & Sinatra, R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of low-achieving Inner-City seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 356–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H., & O’Donell, A. M. (1996). Cognitive and affective outcomes of learning from knowledge maps. Contemporary, Educational Psychology, 21(1), 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J., & Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. (2011). Evaluating learning, design, and engagement in web-based learning tools (WBLTs): The WBLT evaluation scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1849–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. J., & Deshler, D. D. (2010). Literacy instruction, technology, and students with learning disabilities: Research we have, research we need. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. J., Deshler, D. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2015). Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(1), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(2), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, B. A., Bulgren, J. A., & Hudson, P. (1990). Content enhancement: A model for promoting the acquisition of content by individuals with learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & B. L. Y. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 122–165). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marée, T., van Bruggen, J., & Jochems, W. (2013). Effective self-regulated science learning through multimedia-enriched skeleton concept maps. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(1), 16–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2002). Cognitive theory and the design of multimedia instruction: An example of two-way street between cognition and instruction: An example of two way street between cognition and instruction. New directions for teaching and learning, 89, 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J., & Adesope, O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaraizi, M. & Theofanous, M. (2012) The strategic use of concept maps in reading comprehension of students who are deaf. In A. J. Canas, J. D. Novak & J. Vanhear (Eds.) Proceedings of the fifth International conference “concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology” (pp. 39-45). Malta: Veritas Press.

  • Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (1991). Clarify with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 58(7), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D. (2010). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Journal of e-Learning and knowledge society, 6(3), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2007). Theoretical origins, of concept maps, how to construct them and uses in education. Reflecting Education, 3(1), 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. D., & Canas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition: Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K. M. (2009). An investigation of concept mapping to improve the reading comprehension of science texts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 402–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2006) Dual coding theory and education. Draft chapter for the conference on ‘pathways to literacy achievement for high poverty children’, the University of Michigan School of education, September 29–October 1, 2006.

  • Palmer, J., Boon, R., & Spencer, V. (2014). Effects of concept mapping instruction on the vocabulary acquisition skills of seventh graders with mild disabilities: A replication study. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 30(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1987). Language, speech and print: Some asymmetries in the acquisition of literacy. In R. Horowitz & S. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 355–369). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Schumer, H. (1990). Patterns of individual differences in the development of listening and reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rye, J. (1982). Cloze procedure and the teaching of reading. London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saenz, L., & Fuchs, L. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities: Expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, L. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3/4), 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suggate, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, J. (2010). Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers’ performance in memory and reasoning while reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 3(2), 128–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., Hall, K., Lauer, K., Stafford, K., DeSisto, L., & deCani, J. (2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. (1991). Woodcock language proficiency battery-revised. Itasca. IL: Riverside Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, 45110, Ioannina, Greece

    Eleni Morfidi, Anastasios Mikropoulos & Aspasia Rogdaki

Authors
  1. Eleni Morfidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anastasios Mikropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aspasia Rogdaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleni Morfidi.

Appendix The set of digital text-based concept maps for Earthquakes

Appendix The set of digital text-based concept maps for Earthquakes

figure a
figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morfidi, E., Mikropoulos, A. & Rogdaki, A. Using concept mapping to improve poor readers’ understanding of expository text. Educ Inf Technol 23, 271–286 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9600-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9600-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation