Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Augmented reflective learning and knowledge retention perceived among students in classrooms involving virtual laboratories

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning theories converge on the principles of reflective learning processes and perceive them as fundamental to effective learning. Traditional laboratory education in science and engineering often happens in highly resource-constrained environments that compromise some of the learning objectives. This paper focuses on characterizing three learning attributes associated with reflective learning i.e. metacognition (M), analogical reasoning (A) and transfer of knowledge (T) and assessed college laboratory education blended with ICT-enabled virtual laboratories. Key contributions of this study include: 1) Development of assessment of MAT attributes using a combination of multiple choice questions, True/False statements and descriptive questions 2) assessment of conceptual learning occurring in the laboratory environment and of learning attributes using Virtual Laboratories (VLs) in classroom education. Feedback data indicated using virtual laboratories in classrooms for training students before using physical laboratories demonstrated a significant improvement (>100% change) in learning in comparison to physical laboratories without VLs. We also show using VLs as pre-lab or post-lab exercise augmented reflective learning and information retention among 145 students in this blended learning case study, compared to an independent control group of 45 students who had no virtual laboratory training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrantes, P. (1999). Analogical reasoning and modeling in the sciences. Foundations of Science, 4, 237–270. doi:10.1023/A:1009623823171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achuthan, K., Brahmanandan, S., Bose, L. (2015). Cognitive load Management in Multimedia Enhanced Interactive Virtual Laboratories, in: El-Alfy, E.-S.M., Thampi, S.M., Takagi, H., Piramuthu, S., Hanne, T. (Eds.), Advances in intelligent informatics, advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer international publishing, Cham, p. Pp 143-155. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11218-3{_}15.

  • Afflerbach, P. (2000). Verbal reports and protocol analysis. Handb. Read. Res., 3, 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alipour, F., Idris, K., & Karimi, R. (2011). Knowledge creation and transfer: Role of learning organization. Int. J. Bus. Adm., 2, 61–67. doi:10.5430/ijba.v2n3p61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, J., Harris, D., & Mayadas, F. (2005). Online engineering education: Learning anywhere. Anytime. J. Eng. Educ., 94, 131–146. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00834.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

  • Brown, A.L. (1978). Knowing when, where and, how to remember: A problem of metacognition. Metacognition. (Ed. Glaser) Advances in Instructional Psychology, 1, 225-253.

  • Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Research, 10, 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bubnys, R., Žydžiūnaitė, V. 2010. Reflective learning models in the context of higher education: Concept analysis. Probl. Educ. 21st century (issues {…} 20, 58–70.

  • Büchel, F., Hessels-Schlatter, C., & Scharnhorst, U. (1997). Training and assessment of analogical reasoning in students with severe learning difficulties. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Sanchez, R. P., Campbell, T. (1997). From beyond to within their grasp: The rudiments of analogical problem solving in 10-and 13-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 33, 790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, H., Lee, Y., Purnomo, S.H. (2010). The influences transfer of training on relationship between knowledge characteristic of work design model and outcomes. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(2), 116–123.

  • Colomer, J., Pallisera, M., & Fullana, J. (2013). Reflective learning in higher education : A comparative analysis. Procedia Social Behavioral Science, 93, 364–370. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: SAGE Publications.

  • Daniels, H., Lauder, H., Porter, J. (2009). Knowledge, values, and educational policy: A critical perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2003). Can offline metacognition enhance mathematical problem solving? Journal of Education & Psychology, 95, 188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detterman, D.K., Sternberg, R.J. (1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education, The Kappa Delta Pi lecture series. London: Simon {&} Schuster.

  • Diwakar, S., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., Nair, B. (2012). Biotechnology Virtual Labs: Facilitating Laboratory Access Anytime-Anywhere for Classroom Education, in: Agbo, E. (Ed.), Innovations in Biotechnology (pp. 379–398). Rijeka: Intechopen.

  • Diwakar, S., Parasuram, H., Medini, C., Raman, R., Nedungadi, P., Wiertelak, E., Srivastava, S., Achuthan, K., & Nair, B. (2014a). Complementing neurophysiology education for developing countries via cost-effective virtual labs: Case studies and classroom scenarios. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12, A130–A139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diwakar, S., Radhamani, R., Sujatha, G., Sasidharakurup, H., Shekhar, A., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., Raman, R., Nair, B. (2014b). Usage and diffusion of biotechnology virtual labs for enhancing university education in India’s urban and rural areas. In E-learning as a socio-cultural system: A multidimensional analysis (pp. 63–83) Hershey: IGI Global.

  • Diwakar, S., Radhamani, R., Sasidharakurup, H., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., Nair, B. (2016). Assessing students and teachers experience on simulation and remote biotechnology virtual labs: A case study with a light microscopy experiment. Pp. 44–51. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28883-3_6.

  • Dunlosky, J., & Bjork, R.A. (2008). The integrated nature of metamemory and memory. Handbook of memory and metamemory, pp.11–28.

  • Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D.P. (1988). Strategies for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills/, 2nd ed. ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24. doi:10.1007/BF00156001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. Nat. Intell., 12, 231–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, R. (1995). Best practices for the learner-centered classroom: A collection of articles. Arlington Heights: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing, Inc.

  • Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (1986). Structure-mapping in the development of metaphor. Unpubl. Manuscript, Univ. Illinois, Urbana.

  • Gentner, D., Landers, R. (1985). Analogical reminding: A good match is hard to find, in: Proceedings of the international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. Pp. 607–613.

  • Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277–300. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1003_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Manila: FEU.

  • Goswami, U. (2001). Analogical reasoning in children. Analog Mind Perspect from Cognitive Science, 437–470.

  • Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. The American Psychologist, 53, 449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and analogies in science Notre. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

  • Howard, J. (2004). Metacognitive inquiry. Sch. Educ. Elon Univ. http//Education-journal. htm 1, 2012.

  • Jaafar, S., Awaludin, N.S., Bakar, N.S. (2014). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. In E-proceeding of the Conference on Management and Muamalah 128-135.

  • Jacobs, G., & Murray, M. (2010). Developing critical understanding by teaching action research to undergraduate psychology students. Educ Action Res, 18, 319–335. doi:10.1080/09650792.2010.499789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, H. et al. (2010). Transferring Design Knowledge: Challenges and Opportunities. In X. Zhang et al., eds. Entertainment for Education - Digital Techniques and Systems. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on E-learning and Games (Edutainment 2010). Berlin: Springer, pp. 165–172.

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential education: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

  • Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 281–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laplante, P. A. (2013). Courses for the masses? IT Professional, 15, 57–59. doi:10.1109/MITP.2013.27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauder, W., Reynolds, W., & Angus, N. (1999). Transfer of knowledge and skills: Some implications for nursing and nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 19, 480–487. doi:10.1054/nedt.1999.0338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manen, M. Van (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curric. Inq.

  • Martinez, M.E. (2006). What is metacognition?. Phi delta kappan, 87(9), 696-699.

  • Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, J., Sleegers, P., Elshout-Mohr, M., van Daalen-Kapteijns, M., Meeus, W., & Tempelaar, D. (2013). The development of a questionnaire on metacognition for students in higher education. Educational Research, 55, 31–52. doi:10.1080/00131881.2013.767024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997, 5–12. Doi:10.1002/ace.7401

  • Michael, G. H., Voas, J., Miller, K., Laplante, P., & Bret. (2010). A nonlinear perspective on higher education. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., 43, 90–92. doi:10.1109/MC.2010.338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J.A. (2013). Reflection in learning and professional development: Theory and practice. Routledge.

  • Naghdipour, B., & Emeagwali, O. L. (2013). Assessing the level of reflective thinking in ELT students. Procedia - Social Behavioral Science, 83, 266–271. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. 2015. The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.

  • Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Peltier, J. W. (2006). Reflecting on reflection: Scale extension and a comparison of undergraduate business students in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 5–16. doi:10.1177/0273475305279658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Education & Psychology, 82, 33.

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R. S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radhamani, R., Sasidharakurup, H., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Nair, B., Achuthan, K., Diwakar, S. (2014). Explicit interactions by users form a critical element in virtual labs aiding enhanced education -- a case study from biotechnology virtual labs, in: 2014 I.E. sixth international conference on Technology for Education. IEEE, pp. 110–115. doi:10.1109/T4E.2014.37.

  • Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., Diwakar, S., & Bose, R. (2014). The VLAB OER experience: Modeling potential-adopter student acceptance. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57, 235–241. doi:10.1109/TE.2013.2294152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raman, R., Nedungadi, P., Achuthan, K., Diwakar, S. (2011). Integrating collaboration and accessibility for deploying virtual labs using VLCAP. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies, 2(5), 547-560.

  • Renkl, A., Mandl, H., & Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist, 31, 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richland, L. E., & McDonough, I. M. (2010). Learning by analogy: Discriminating between potential analogs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 28–43. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, D., & Lahlafi, A. (2013). Development, implementation and impact of active and reflective learning initiatives to improve web searching skills of international business students at Sheffield Hallam University. UK. Procedia - Social Behavioral Science, 93, 885–894. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasidharakurup, H., Radhamani, R., Kumar, D., Nizar, N., Achuthan, K., & Diwakar, S. (2015). Using virtual laboratories as interactive textbooks: studies on blended learning in biotechnology classrooms. EAI Endorsed Trans. e-Learning, 15. doi:10.4108/el.2.6.e4.

  • Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460–475. doi:10.1006/ceps.1994.1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert student? Instructional Science, 26, 127–140. doi:10.1023/A:1003096215103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hout-Wolters, B. (2000). Assessing active self-directed learning. In: Simons, RJ., van der Linden, J., Duffy, T. (eds) New Learning (pp. 83–99). Dordrecht: Springer. Doi:10.1007/0-306-47614-2_5.

  • Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159–176.

  • Veenman, M.V.J., Elshout, J.J., Groen, M.G.M. (1993). Thinking aloud: Does it affect regulatory processes in learning? Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 18(6), 322-330.

  • Vo, V.A., Li, R., Kornell, N., Pouget, A., Cantlon, J.F., (2014). Young children bet on their numerical skills: metacognition in the numerical domain. Psychological science, 25(9), 1712-1721.

  • Vosniadou, S. (1989). Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acqisition: A developmental perspective. In A. Vosniadou, Stella and Ortony, ed. Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 413–437.

  • Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (Eds.) (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1205–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our work derives direction and ideas from the Chancellor of Amrita University, Sri Mata Amritanandamayi Devi. The authors would like to acknowledge the work of the entire CREATE team and the VALUE team for contribution and support for developing virtual labs. This work was supported by the Sakshat project of National Mission on Education through ICT, Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resource Department, Government of India. SD was supported with Young Research Faculty Fellowship under Sir Visvesvaraya PhD scheme, Ministry of Electronics and IT, Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Amrita Center for Cybersecurity Systems & Networks, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (Amrita University), Amritapuri campus, Clappana P.O, Kollam, 690525, India

    Krishnashree Achuthan & Saneesh P. Francis

  2. Amrita School of Biotechnology, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (Amrita University), Amritapuri campus, Clappana P.O, Kollam, 690525, India

    Shyam Diwakar

Authors
  1. Krishnashree Achuthan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saneesh P. Francis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shyam Diwakar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shyam Diwakar.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d
figure e
figure g
figure h
figure i

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Achuthan, K., Francis, S.P. & Diwakar, S. Augmented reflective learning and knowledge retention perceived among students in classrooms involving virtual laboratories. Educ Inf Technol 22, 2825–2855 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9626-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9626-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation