Abstract
Teacher-student relationship is vital for students’ academic, emotional and social development, as well as for teachers’ professional and personal development. This quantitative study examines teacher-student communication and relationship on Facebook among secondary school teachers (N = 180). We examined teachers’ attitudes towards: a) a policy that bans teacher-student Facebook connections; b) using Facebook for learning. Overall, teachers were interested in broadening communication channels with students, in order to empower learning and interpersonal relationship. However, teachers also maintain traditional teacher-student differentiation; they approve using Facebook for learning and disagree with a banning policy, but also prefer using a professional profile for interacting with their students. Data regarding teachers’ perceptions of relationship with their students and SNS-mediated communication present issues regarding means of communication, attitudes towards the policy of banning SNS, standpoints on using Facebook for learning, and preferred profile for communicating with students. We discuss these issues in light of academic, pedagogical, and inter-personal implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Facebook Stats, http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info [retrieved June 2017].
The term “homeroom” is explained in Section 7.3.2. Relationship between Ang’s Axes and Homeroom Teaching.
SimilarWeb’s statistics for 31.3.2013 reveals that Facebook was the most popular site in Israel, as was reported in https://www.isoc.org.il/sts-data/10837 [Hebrew]; TIM survey about Internet use in Israel, published on 14.1.2013, reported that Facebook was the second most popular site in Israel (after Google), as was reported in http://b.walla.co.il/item/2606671 [Hebrew].
This commonly-used term is defined by Oxford Dictionaries as “A person who tries to be like someone else or to fit in with a particular group of people” (Wannabe 2017).
Teaching Forces in the Education System for the Years 1991–2013 (A Collection of Statistical Findings) [in Hebrew], Central Bureau of Statistics, published in November 2013.
References
Ang, R. P. (2005). Development and validation of the teacher–student relationship inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74, 55–73.
Asterhan, C. S., & Rosenberg, H. (2015). The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher–student interactions in Facebook: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 85, 134–148.
Bernstein-Yamashiro, B., & Noam, G. G. (2013). Teacher-student relationships: A growing field of study. New Directions for Youth Development, 2013(137), 15–26.
Blonder, R., & Rap, S. (2017). I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 697–724.
Carter, H. L., Foulger, T. S., & Ewbank, A. D. (2008). Have you Googled your teacher lately? Teachers' use of social networking sites. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(9), 681–685.
Christensen, C. M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 94.
Cooper, K. S. (2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 363–402.
Da Silva, A., & Barbosa, M.P. (2015). Facebook groups: The use of social network in the education. In the International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 185–188). Setúbal: IEEE.
Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234.
Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167–176.
Ellison, N. B., Vitak, J., Gray, R., & Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855–870.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
Fauville, G., Dupont, S., von Thun, S., & Lundin, J. (2015). Can Facebook be used to increase scientific literacy? A case study of the Monterey Bay aquarium research institute Facebook page and ocean literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 60–73.
Forkosh-Baruch, A. & Hershkovitz, A. (2014). Teacher-student relationship in the Facebook-era. In P. Isaías, P. Kommers, T. Issa (Eds.), The Evolution of the Internet in the Business Sector: Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 (pp. 145-172). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Foulger, T. S., Ewbank, A. D., Kay, A., Popp, S. O., & Carter, H. L. (2009). Moral space in MySpace: Preservice teachers' perspectives about ethical issues in social networking. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 1–28.
Greenhow, C., & Askari, E. (2017). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education. Education and Information Technologies, 20(1), 623–645.
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30.
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246–259.
Hagenauer, G., Hascher, T., & Volet, S. E. (2015). Teacher emotions in the classroom: Associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(4), 385–403.
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Hew, K. F. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ use of Facebook. Computers in Education, 27(2), 662–676.
Israeli Ministry of Education. (2011). Director General Communication, Instruction 9.4–10: Education to Protectedness, to Ethics Keeping and to Appropriate and Wise Behavior on the Web [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem.
Israeli Ministry of Education (2013). Director General Communication, Instruction 6.1–1: Using Social Networking Sites and Online Collaborative Communities in the Education System [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem.
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525.
Karal, H., Kokoc, M., & Cakir, O. (2017). Impact of the educational use of Facebook group on the high school students’ proper usage of language. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 677–695.
Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Facebook as learning platform: Argumentation superhighway or dead-end street? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 621–625.
Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment? Child Development, 72(5), 1579–1601.
Lim, K., Kang, M. S., & Shin, S. W. (2012). The study on experts’ perceptions on usage elements of SNSs and the investigation on the priority of the elements for SNSs’ educational use through importance-performance analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 925–952.
Male, T., & Burden, K. (2014). Access denied? Twenty-first-century technology in schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(4), 423–437.
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi:10.1111/jcal.12154.
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I'll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17.
Pavlik, J. V. (2015). Fueling a third paradigm of education: The pedagogical implications of digital, social and mobile media. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(2), 113–125.
Pianta, R. C. (1992). The student teacher relationship scale. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, L. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7(2), 295–312.
Queensland Department of Education, Training and Employment (2016). Standard of practice. Brisbane.
Raufelder, D., Nitsche, L., Breitmeyer, S., Keßler, S., Hermann, E., & Regner, N. (2016). Students’ perception of “good” and “bad” teachers—Results of a qualitative thematic analysis with German adolescents. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 31–44.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Chicago: Simon and Schuster.
Russo, C. J., Squelch, J., & Varnham, S. (2010). Teachers and social networking sites: Think before you post. Public Space: The Journal of Law and Social Justice, 5(Article 5), 1–15.
Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 213–231.
Schroeder, M. (2013). Keeping the ‘free’ in teacher speech rights: Protecting teachers and their use of social media to communicate with students beyond the schoolhouse gates. Journal of Law and Technology, 19(2), 1–128.
Schwarz, B., & Caduri, G. (2016). Novelties in the use of social networks by leading teachers in their classes. Computers & Education, 102, 35–51.
Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157–174.
The Association Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research (2017). New survey reveals Snapchat and Instagram are the most popular social media platforms among American teens (Press release). http://apnorc.org/projects/Pages/Instagram-and-Snapchat-are-Most-Popular-Social-Networks-for-Teens.aspx. Accessed June 2017.
The Teaching Council (2016). Code of professional conduct for teachers (2nd edition, 2012). Maynooth.
Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112–126.
Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2016). Decreasing risky behavior on social network sites: The impact of parental involvement in secondary education interventions. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(3), 247–261.
Wallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., & Ruzek, E. (2016). What can student perception surveys tell us about teaching? Empirically testing the underlying structure of the tripod student perception survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834–1868.
Wannabe (2017). In OxfordDictionaries.com. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/wannabe. Accessed 3 March 2017.
Warnick, B. R., Bitters, T. A., Falk, T. M., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Social media use and teacher ethics. Educational Policy, 30(5), 771–795.
Wentzel, K. R. (2003). Motivating students to behave in socially competent ways. Theory Into Practice, 42(4), 319–326.
Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66(3), 754–763.
Wilcken, A. J., & Roseth, C. J. (2015). The importance of teacher–student relationships for student engagement and achievement. In C. M. Rubie-Davies, J. M. Stephens, & P. Penelope Watson (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of social psychology of the classroom (pp. 177–187). New York: Routledge.
Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 6–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forkosh-Baruch, A., Hershkovitz, A. Broadening communication yet holding back: Teachers’ perceptions of their relationship with students in the SNS-era. Educ Inf Technol 23, 725–740 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9632-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9632-z