Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: A summary of current research and practical proposal for future work

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational robotics are increasingly appearing in educational settings, being considered a useful supporting tool for the development of cognitive skills, including Computational Thinking (CT), for students of all ages. Meanwhile, there is an overwhelming argument that CT will be a fundamental skill needed for all individuals by the middle of the twenty-first century and thus, should be cultivated in the early school years, as part of the child’s analytical thinking and as a principal component of Science-Technology-Engineering-Mathematics (STEM) education. This study reviews published literature at the intersection of CT and educational robotics, particularly focused on the use of educational robotics for advancing students’ CT skills in K-12. The reviewed articles reveal initial evidence suggesting that educational robotics can foster students’ cognitive and social skills. The paper discusses specific areas for further inquiry by learning researchers and learning practitioners. Such inquiry should start from a widely agreed definition of CT and validated measurement instruments for its assessment. A practical framework for the development of CT via robotics is next in demand, so as instructional designers and educators can implement it consistently and at scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, L. D., & Tacla, C. A. (2015). Supporting the Development of Computational Thinking: A Robotic Platform Controlled by Smartphone. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Second International Conference, LCT 2015, Held as Part of HCI International 2015, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 2–7, 2015, Proceedings (Vol. 9192, p. 124). Springer.

  • Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berland, M., Martin, T., Benton, T., Petrick Smith, C., & Davis, D. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the learning pathways of novice programmers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 564–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics in early childhood education. Information Technology in Childhood Education, 1, 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 1–25).

  • Czerkawski, B. (2015). Computational Thinking in Virtual Learning Environments. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2015 (pp. 993–997).

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers and Education, 69, 485–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2010). What is Educational Robotics? Theories behind it and practical implementation. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 4006–4014). Jacksonville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • Eguchi, A. (2014a). Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills. Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eguchi, A. (2014b). Learning experience through RoboCupJunior: Promoting STEM education and 21st century skills with robotics competition. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.

  • Franklin, D., Conrad, P., Boe, B., Nilsen, K., Hill, C., Len, M., ... & Laird, C. (2013). Assessment of computer science learning in a scratch-based outreach program. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 371–376). ACM.

  • Grover, S. (2011). Robotics and engineering for middle and high school students to develop computational thinking. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I. E., & Papert, S. E. (1991). Constructionism. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

  • Ioannou, I., & Angeli, C. (2016). A Framework and an Instructional Design Model for the Development of Students' Computational and Algorithmic Thinking. In MCIS (p. 19). Chicago.

  • Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, K. H., Basawapatna, A., Bennett, V., & Repenning, A. (2010). Towards the automatic recognition of computational thinking for adaptive visual language learning. In 2010 I.E. Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (pp. 59–66). IEEE.

  • Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., & Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using robotics and game design to enhance Children’s self-efficacy, STEM attitudes, and computational thinking skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikropoulos, T. A., & Bellou, I. (2013). Educational robotics as mindtools. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). Report of a workshop of pedagogical aspects of computational thinking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (2000). What's the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3.4), 720–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penmetcha, M. R. (2012). Exploring the effectiveness of robotics as a vehicle for computational thinking (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University).

  • Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repenning, A., Webb, D., & Ioannidou, A. (2010) Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on computer science education. Milwaukee, WI, pp 265–269.

  • Resnick, M., Ocko, S., & Papert, S. (1988). LEGO, Logo, and design. Children's Environments Quarterly, 5, 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J. C., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Dimitriadis, Y., & Hoppe, U. (2013). Classroom orchestration: Synthesis. Computers and Education, 69, 523–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweikardt, E., & Gross, M. D. (2006). roBlocks: A robotic construction kit for mathematics and science education. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Multimodal interfaces (pp. 72–75). ACM.

  • Seiter, L., & Foreman, B. (2013). Modeling the learning progressions of computational thinking of primary grade students. In Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research (pp. 59–66). ACM.

  • Sklar, E., Eguchi, A., & Johnson, J.. (2003). RoboCupJunior: Learning with educational robotics. RoboCup 2002: Robot soccer world cup VI, pp. 238–253.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vallance, M., & Towndrow, P. A. (2016). Pedagogic transformation, student-directed design and computational thinking. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 11(3), 218–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verner, I. M., Waks, S., & Kolberg, E. (1999). Educational robotics: An insight into systems engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 24(2), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virnes, M., Sutinen, E., & Kärnä-Lin, E. (2008). How children's individual needs challenge the design of educational robotics. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children (pp. 274–281). ACM.

  • Wagner, S. P. (1998). Robotics and children: Science achievement and problem solving. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 9(2), 149–192.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (2001). Modeling nature’s emergent patterns with multi-agent languages. In the Proceedings of EuroLogo, 1–6. Retrieved May 2015, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.294.8094&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. In the Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 465–470). Retrieved February 2016, from http://cs4edu.cs.purdue.edu/_media/sigcse11-final.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cyprus Interaction Lab, Cyprus University of Technology, 30 Archbishop Kyprianou Str., 3036, Lemesos, Cyprus

    Andri Ioannou & Eria Makridou

Authors
  1. Andri Ioannou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eria Makridou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andri Ioannou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ioannou, A., Makridou, E. Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: A summary of current research and practical proposal for future work. Educ Inf Technol 23, 2531–2544 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9729-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9729-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation