Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Teachers’ perceptions of out-of-class communication, teacher-student relationship, and classroom environment

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication between students and teachers is usually extended beyond the classroom’s time and space. This communication, referred to as out-of-class communication (OCC), may impact students’ academic, social, and emotional development. Today, OCC is facilitated via social media and instant messaging services, which may affect its nature. This quantitative study (N = 155) aims to analyze the impact of WhatsApp™-based OCC between middle- and high-school teachers and their students on two variables that are key to learning and teaching: Teacher-student relationship and classroom environment. The data was collected through teachers’ self-reported questionnaires. Overall, we find that despite manifested somewhat differently from traditional OCC, teachers’ use of WhatsApp for OCC is also associated with better relationship with students and with better classroom environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a third space: Between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 160–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, R. (2005). Development and validation of the teacher-student relationship inventory using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.1.55-74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asterhan, C. S. C., & Rosenberg, H. (2015). The promise, reality and dilemmas of secondary school teacher–student interactions in Facebook: The teacher perspective. Computers & Education, 85, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2015.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Gosen, N. (2015). Different role perceptions and student-teacher relationship characteristics, among high school homeroom educators and subject teachers’ – Results from a qualitative research. Studia Edukacyjne, 36, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bills, L. (2000). Politeness in teacher-student dialogue in mathematics: A socio-linguistic analysis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(2), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children’s interpersonal behaviors and the teacher–child relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 934–946. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, L. W. (2005). Dialogue in the lecture hall: Teacher-student communication and students' perceptions of their learning. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 6(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolkan, S., & Holmgren, J. L. (2012). “You are such a great teacher and I hate to bother you but…”: Instructors’ perceptions of students and their use of email messages with varying politeness strategies. Communication Education, 61(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.667135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boren, R., Callahan, C., & Peugh, J. (2011). Out with the old, in with the new: Factor analyses of a classroom environment measure. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910383191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E., & Evertson, C. M. (1978). Context variables in teaching. Educational Psychologist, 12(3), 310–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costine, J. (2017). Facebook messenger day hits 70M daily users as the app reaches 1.3B monthlies [Blog post]. Retreived from https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/14/facebook-messenger-1-3-billion/. Accessed 28 July 2018.

  • Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2013.04.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSchryver, M., Mishra, P., Koehleer, M., & Francis, A. (2009). Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for discussions in an online course enhance perceived social presence and student interaction? In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2009, pp. 329336). VA: Chesapeake.

  • Dobransky, N. D., & Frymier, A. B. (2004). Developing teacher-student relationships through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly, 52(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, A., Lewis, C., Veletsianos, G., & Nichols-Besel, K. (2008). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of instant messaging in two educational contexts. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P. (2003). Relationship between school and classroom environment and teacher burnout: A LISREL analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 6(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023296126723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014). Teaching crowds: Learning and social media. Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I. M., Harvey, S. T., Buckley, L., & Yan, E. (2009). Differentiating classroom climate concepts: Academic, management, and emotional environments. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 4(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2009.9522449doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2009.9522449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley-Lucas, B. S., & Sargent, M. M. (2011). Enhancing out-of-class communication. To Improve the Academy, 30(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2011.tb00649.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2014). Teacher-student relationship in the Facebook-era. In P. Isaías, P. Kommers, T. Issa (Eds.), The Evolution of the Internet in the Business Sector: Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 (pp. 145–172). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

  • Forkosh-Baruch, A., & Hershkovitz, A. (2018). Broadening communication yet holding back: Teachers’ perceptions of their relationship with students in the SNS-era. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 725–740.

  • Forkosh-Baruch, A., Hershkovitz, A., & Ang, R. P. (2015). Teacher-student relationship and SNS mediated communication: Perceptions of both role-players. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 11, 273–289.

  • Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 3–27). Elmsford: Pergamon Press.

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009932514731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, R. (2017, June 9). Poll: 43% of employees use instant messaging tools on the job. Available at https://www.hrdive.com/news/poll-43-of-employees-use-instant-messaging-tools-on-the-job/444599.

  • Goldman, Z. W., Goodboy, A. K., & Bolkan, S. (2016). A meta-analytical review of students’ out-of-class communication and learning effects. Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1103293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., & Askari, E. (2017). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 623–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9446-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Weinstein, R. S. (2004). Connection and regulation at home and in school: Predicting growth in achievement for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(4), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, L. (2015). An examination of the relationship between the communication methods used in out-of-class student-faculty interactions and the content and frequency of those interactions (unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation). Cardinal Stritch University, Milwaukee.

  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Mink (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–71). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists. https://doi.org/10.1300/J137v09n01_12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harfitt, G. J. (2014). Brokering dialogue between secondary students and teachres to co-construct appropriate pedagogy in reduced-size classes. Teachers and Teaching, 20(2), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, P., Weibelzahl, S., & Hall, T. (2013). Text messaging for out-of-class communication: Impact on affective learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Learning. International Association for Development of the Information Society (pp. 5966).

  • Helvie-Mason, L. (2011). Facebook, “friending,” and faculty–student communication. In C. Wankel (Ed.), Teaching arts and science with the new social media (cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education, volume 3) (pp. 61–87). Bincley: Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2044-9968(2011)0000003007.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkovitz, A., & Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2017). Teacher-student relationship and SNS-mediated communication: student perceptions. Comunicar, 53(4), 91–100.

  • Hershkovitz, A., Forkosh-Baruch, A., Ang R. (2014). ‘I Miss My Students’: Characterizing Teachers Seeking Connection with Their Students via Social Networking Sites. In Media Conference, Tampere University, Finland, June. 2014.

  • Jaasma, M. A., & Koper, R. J. (1999). The relationship of student-faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. a. (2011). The effect of twitter posts on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.534798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2009.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S., Shah, A., & Ahmad, S. (2015). The role of out-of-class communication in instructor’s verbal/non-verbal behavior, trust, and student motivation. Business & Economic Review, 7(1), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2011.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H.-Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. M. (2003). Effective teacher ↔ student dialogue: A model from biological education. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655864org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kio, S. I. (2016). Extending social networking into the secondary education sector. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12259.

  • Knapp, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2002). Out-of-class communication: The development and testing of a measure. In The meeting of the Eastern Communication Association. New York.

  • Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment? Child Development, 72(5), 1579–1601. https://doi.org/10.2307/3654405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAulay, D. J. (1990). Classroom environment: A literature review. Educational Psychology, 10(3), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341900100305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social media in academic practices. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2015.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. M., & Myers, S. A. (2006). Students’ communication traits and their out-of-class communication with their instructors. Communication Research Reports, 23(4), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090600962599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601009710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education. (2011). Ethics and protectedness on the internet (in Hebrew). Jerusalem.

  • Ministry of Education. (2013). Using online social networks and collaborative communities in the education system (in Hebrew). Jerusalem.

  • Moos, R. H., & Trickett, E. J. (1974). Classroom environment scale manual. Palo Alto.

  • Myers, S. A. (2004). The relationship between perceived instructor credibility and college student in-class and out-of-class communication. Communication Reports, 17(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210409389382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. E., & Fouts, J. T. (1992). A cluster analysis of high school science classroom environments and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 929–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. A., & Claus, C. J. (2012). The relationship between students’ motives to communicate with their instructors and classroom environment. Communication Quarterly, 60(3), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.688672.

  • Nadler, M. K., & Nadler, L. B. (2001). The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out-of-class communication between faculty and students. Women’s Studies in Communication, 24(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2001.10162436.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Odewumi, O. M., Bamigboye, F. B., Olawuyi, O. F., & Bamigboye, O. O. (2017). Perceptions of undergraduate students on social media for learning: A case study of university of Ibadan. Journal of Communication, 8(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0976691X.2017.1336269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21(1–2), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1986.9653025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowska, D. K., Westerman, J. W., Bergman, S. M., & Huelsman, T. J. (2014). Student personality, classroom environment, and student outcomes: A person–environment fit analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2014.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C. (1992). The student-teacher relationship scale. Charlottesville.

  • Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7(2), 295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulou, M. (2014). The effects on students' emotional and behavioural difficulties of teacher–student interactions, students' social skills and classroom context. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 986–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3131.

  • Raufelder, D., Nitsche, L., Breitmeyer, S., Keßler, S., Herrmann, E., & Regner, N. (2016). Students' perception of "good" and "bad" teachers – Results of a qualitative thematic analysis with German adolescents. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2010.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rönkkö, K., Urinboyev, R., Svensson, M., Svensson, L., & Carlsson, H. (2017). Literature review of social media in professional organisations 2000–2015: Work, stress, power relations, leadership, librarians, teachers, and social workers. Kristianstad University.

  • Rosenberg, H., & Asterhan, C. S. C. (2017). What’s app, sir? Teachers and students in WhatsApp groups (in Hebrew). In B. Shwartz, H. Rosenberg, & C. Asterhan (Eds.), Breaking down barriers? Teachers, students and social network sites (pp. 77–101). Tel Aviv, Israel: MOFET Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships. Attachment and Human Development, 14(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2016). The most popular messaging app in every country. Retrieved January 23, 2018, from https://www.similarweb.com/blog/worldwide-messaging-apps

  • Sheer, V. C., & Fung, T. K. (2007). Can email communication enhance professor-student relationship and student evaluation of professor?: Some empirical evidence. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.37.3.d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidelinger, R. J., Bolen, D. M., McMullen, A. L., & Nyeste, M. C. (2015). Academic and social integration in the basic communication course: Predictors of students’ out-of-class communication and academic learning. Communication Studies, 66(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2013.856807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoms, B., & Eryilmaz, E. (2014). How media choice affects learner interactions in distance learning classes. Computers & Education, 75, 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2014.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973). Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trickett, E. J., Qninlan, D. M., & Trickett, E. J. (1979). Three domains of classroom environment: Factor analysis of the classroom environment scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 7(3), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuria, R., & Yadlin-Segal, A. (2017). Israel. In L. M. Steckman & M. J. Andrews (Eds.), Online around the world: A geographic encyclopedia of the internet, social media, and mobile apps (pp. 144–148). Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Sijde, P. C., & Tomic, W. (1992). The influence of a teacher training program on student perception of classroom climate. Journal of Education for Teaching, 18(3), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747920180306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (2003). Motivating students to behave in socially competent ways. Theory Into Practice, 42(4), 319–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/1477395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R., & Asher, S. R. (1995). The academic lives of neglected, rejected, popular, and controversial children. Child Development, 66(3), 754–763. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WhatsApp. (2017). Connecting one billion users every day (blog post). Retrieved from https://blog.whatsapp.com/10000631/Connecting-One-Billion-Users-Every-Day

  • Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher-student relationship in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1–2), 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnon Hershkovitz.

Ethics declarations

Upon acceptance of this manuscript, the authors will make efforts to share the data collected in this research. Data will be shared via an open-access platform of our institution.

Informed consent

All data was collected without any identifying details of the participants. Being adults (i.e., over 18y/o), participants have read and signed an informed consent form.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest that might have affected data collection and/or reporting.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elhay, A.A., Hershkovitz, A. Teachers’ perceptions of out-of-class communication, teacher-student relationship, and classroom environment. Educ Inf Technol 24, 385–406 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9782-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9782-7

Keywords

Navigation