Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Present-day management of universities in Russia: Prospects and challenges of e-learning

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The E-learning market is becoming more and more popular in the world. This is evidenced by the increased budget allocations for e-learning programs, the growing prevalence of e-learning in various markets all over the world and new trends in modern technology and tools. The study aims to evaluate the readiness of university management and students for active e-learning. The objective is to identify the prospects and problems of the information and communication technology in educational management when introducing e-learning. To achieve the research objectives, we conducted a survey in the form of a questionnaire among the first-year graduate IT students of three Moscow universities directly involved in e-learning initiatives. The survey involved 135 teachers, 19 information and communication technology (ICT)/e-learning specialists, 6 university managers and 3 heads of university management, one from each of the three universities. The research showed that despite the potential of a learning management system to support both blended learning and e-learning, most e-learning initiatives are not fully realized; they completely or partially fail. Poor marketing strategies, poor service strategies and insufficient technical support are some of the most likely causes of failure. The possibility of students and teachers to interact and the expansion of the geography of education should be noted among the prospects of modern management in the implementation of e-learning. It has been revealed that more than half of the students (54%) independently develop applications and programs for e-learning. The results of our research can become the basis for further research in e-learning and its prevalence in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: A unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003–2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alyushin, M. V., & Kolobashkina, L. V. (2019). Monitoring of the current status of students as a means of increasing the effectiveness of educational process. The Education and science journal, 21(2), 176–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arinto, P. B. (2016). Issues and challenges in open and distance e-learning: Perspectives from the Philippines. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2).

  • Badwan, J. J., Al Shobaki, M. J., Naser, S. S. A., & Amuna, Y. M. A. (2017). Adopting technology for customer relationship management in higher educational institutions. International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems (IJEAIS), 1(1), 20–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belyakova, E. G., & Zakharova, I. G. (2019). Interaction of university students with educational content in the conditions of information educational environment. The Education and science journal, 21(3), 77–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Jesus, F., Vicente, M. R., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). The education-related digital divide: An analysis for the EU-28. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denchev, S., Pavlova, I., & Pavlova, M. (2016). The reform of higher education through Alternative University teaching models. Creative Education, 7(02), 302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, U. D. (2016). Chapter open educational resources in Germany. OpenEducational Resources: Policy, Costs and, 87.

  • Gulati, S. (2008). Technology-enhanced learning in developing nations: A review. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan, J. B. (2016). Lifelong learning and technology. Pew Research Center, 22.

  • Huynh, M. Q., Umesh, U. N., & Valacich, J. S. (2003). E-learning as an emerging entrepreneurial enterprise in universities and firms. C ommunications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 3.

  • Kashorda, M., & Waema, T. (2014). E-Readiness survey of Kenyan Universities (2013) report. Nairobi: Kenya Education Network.

  • Kataoka, H., & Mertala, M. (2017). The role of educators and their challenges in distance learning in new millennium. Palma Journal, 16(3), 423–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnova, G. A., Nuhuly, A., & Teslenko, V. A. (2017). E-learning in the world and Russia: State, trends and prospects RUDN. Journal of Informatization in Education/ RUDN Bulletin. Series: Informatization of Education, 14(3), 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuprina, T. V., Beketova, A. P., & Minasyan, S. M. (2019). Self-Organising Systems in the context of academic environment. The Education and science journal, 21(1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado, U., Feroz Khan, G., Moon, J., & Jeung Rho, J. (2011). E-learning motivation and educational portal acceptance in developing countries. Online Information Review, 35(1), 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novikov, D.A. (2009), Theory of educational systems management, M.: National Education, pp. 452.

  • Pavlova, D. (2015). Government, in the clouds. Proceedings of VIIth International Scientific Seminar, Modern Dimensions in European Education And research Area, Bulgarian-British Cultural Communications, London, pp. 29–34.

  • Sabi, H. M., Uzoka, F. M. E., Langmia, K., & Njeh, F. N. (2016). Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education. International Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, U. (2016). Redefining knowledge management education with the support of personal knowledge management devices, SmartEducation and e-Learning 2016, Springer, Cham, pp. 515–525.

  • Shakeabubakor, A. A., Sundararajan, E., & Hamdan, A. R. (2015). Cloud computing services and applications to improve productivity of university researchers. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering, 5(2), 153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau, W. L., & Chau, P. Y. (2016). Understanding behavioral intention to use a cloud computing classroom: A multiple model comparison approach. Information & Management, 53(3), 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamrakar, A., & Mehta, K. K. (2009). Analysis of effectiveness of web based e-learning through information technology. Economics, 6, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (2015). Challenges of implementing e-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1).

  • Tena, R. R., Almenara, J. C., & Osuna, J. B. (2016). E-learning of Andalusian University's lecturers. Gender. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(2), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touray, A., Salminen, A., & Mursu, A. (2013). ICT barriers and critical success factors in developing countries. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 56(7), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uskov, V. L., Bakken, J. P., Pandey, A., Singh, U., Yalamanchili, M., & Penumatsa, A. (2016). Smart university taxonomy: Features, components, systems. In Smart education and e-learning 2016 (pp. 3–14). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Volles, N. (2016). Lifelong learning in the EU: Changing conceptualisations, actors, and policies. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 343–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. S., Lindner, J. R., Murphrey, T. P., & Dooley, K. (2016). Learning management system usage. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(2), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, J., Yang, E., Lee, J. and Hwang, S. J. (2017). Lifelong learning with dynamically expandable networks arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.01547.

  • Zaharias, P., & Pappas, C. (2016). Quality management of learning management systems: A user experience perspective. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 3(1), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamani, B. E., & Esfijani, A. (2016). Major barriers for participating in online teaching in developing countries from Iranian faculty members’ perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena R. Vershitskaya.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vershitskaya, E.R., Mikhaylova, A.V., Gilmanshina, S.I. et al. Present-day management of universities in Russia: Prospects and challenges of e-learning. Educ Inf Technol 25, 611–621 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09978-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09978-0

Keywords

Navigation