Abstract
Cyberloafing is one of the phenomena that adversely affects the efficiency and productivity in learning and teaching activities in educational settings. Increased ICT (information and communication technology) access status in educational environments and personal mobile devices lead to a wide range of cyberloafing behaviors of learners. In this regard, the aim of this study was to investigate cyberloafing behaviors of high school students in terms of several variables, including gender, ICT usage, unauthorized access to school network, metacognitive awareness and smartphone addiction. In this study, the relational screening model from descriptive research methods was used. A total of 269 9th grade students, 123 of whom were male and 146 of whom were female, were recruited. Hierarchical linear multilevel regression analysis was employed in the data analysis. The findings indicate that four of the five models designed to investigate cyberloafing behaviors in educational settings were found to be statistically significant. In other words, four hypotheses were supported. It has been concluded that the unauthorized access to the school network of learners has a significant impact on the cyberloafing behaviors in educational contexts. Additionally, the smartphone addiction and metacognitive awareness levels of students, as well as daily social media usage time are fundamental predictors of the cyberloafing behaviors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbulut, Y., Dursun, Ö. Ö., Dönmez, O., & Şahin, Y. L. (2016). In search of a measure to investigate cyberloafing in educational settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 616–625.
Akbulut, Y., Dönmez, O., & Dursun, Ö. Ö. (2017). Cyberloafing and social desirability bias among students and employees. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 87–95.
Aljomaa, S. S., Qudah, M. F. A., Albursan, I. S., Bakhiet, S. F., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2016). Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 155–164.
Anandarajan, M. (2002). Profiling web usage in the workplace: A behavior-based artificial intelligence approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 243–266.
Arabaci, I. B. (2017). Investigation faculty of education students’ cyberloafing behaviors in terms of various variables. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 16(1), 72–82.
Arıkan, R. (2013). Araştırma yöntem ve teknikleri [Research methods and techniques]. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
Askew, K., Buckner, J. E., Taing, M. U., Ilie, A., Bauer, J. A., & Coovert, M. D. (2014). Explaining cyberloafing: The role of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 510–519.
Baker, W. M., Lusk, E. J., & Neuhauser, K. L. (2012). On the use of cell phones and other electronic devices in the classroom: Evidence from a survey of faculty and students. Journal of Education for Business, 87(5), 275–289.
Baturay, M. H., & Toker, S. (2015). An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 358–366.
Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1067–1084.
Blau, G., Yang, Y., & Ward-Cook, K. (2006). Testing a measure of cyberloafing. Journal of Allied Health, 35(1), 9–17.
Brubaker, A. T. (2006). Faculty perceptions of the impact of student laptop use in a wireless Internet environment on the classroom learning environment and teaching (Master Dissertation). University of North Carolina.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı istatistik, arastırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [data analysis handbook for social sciences statistics, research pattern spss applications and ınterpretation] (24th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
Chen, J. V., Chen, C. C., & Yang, H.-H. (2008). An empirical evaluation of key factors contributing to internet abuse in the workplace. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(1), 87–106.
Choi, H.-S., Lee, H.-K., & Ha, J.-C. (2012). The influence of smartphone addiction on mental health, campus life and personal relations-focusing on K university students. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society, 23(5), 1005–1015.
Çınar, O., & Karcıoğlu, F. (2015). The relationship between cyber loafing and organizational citizenship behavior: A survey study in Erzurum/Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 444–453.
Comber, C., Colley, A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Dorn, L. (1997). The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes. Educational Research, 39(2), 123–133.
Comer, D. E., & Droms, R. E. (2003). Computer networks and internets. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall Inc..
Dursun, O. O., Donmez, O., & Akbulut, Y. (2018). Predictors of cyberloafing among preservice information technology teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 22–41.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.
Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (2001). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 69–83). New York: Springer.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In Metacognition, motivation understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillside: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Garrett, R. K., & Danziger, J. N. (2008). On cyberslacking: Workplace status and personal internet use at work. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 287–292.
Gerow, J. E., Galluch, P. S., & Thatcher, J. B. (2010). To slack or not to slack: Internet usage in the classroom. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(3), 5–24.
Gökçearslan, Ş., Mumcu, F. K., Haşlaman, T., & Çevik, Y. D. (2016). Modelling smartphone addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 639–649.
Gökçearslan, Ş., Uluyol, Ç., & Şahin, S. (2018). Smartphone addiction, cyberloafing, stress and social support among university students: A path analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 91, 47–54.
Gourgey, A. F. (2001). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 17–32). New York: Springer.
Gunuc, S., & Kayri, M. (2010). The profile of internet dependency in Turkey and development of internet addiction scale: Study of validity and reliability. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39, 220–232.
Hardiani, W. A., Rahardja, E., & Yuniawan, A. (2018). Effect of role conflict and role overload to burnout and its impact on cyberloafing. Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, 26(2), 89–99.
Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 276–297.
Karakelle, S., & Saraç, S. (2007). Validity and factor structure of Turkish versions of the metacognitive awareness inventory for children (Jr. MAI)—A and B forms. Turkish Psychological Articles, 10(20), 87–103.
Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., Öztürk, H. T., Sezer, B., & Karademir, T. (2015). Cyberloafing as a barrier to the successful integration of information and communication technologies into teaching and learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 290–298.
Karasar, N. (2013). Scientific research method: Concepts-principles-techniques [in Turkish] (26th edn). Ankara: Nobel Publication.
Ke, F. (2008). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: Cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5–6), 539–556.
Keser, H., Kavuk, M., & Numanoglu, G. (2016). The relationship between cyber-loafing and internet addiction. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(1), 37–42.
Khansa, L., Barkhi, R., Ray, S., & Davis, Z. (2017, 2017). Cyberloafing in the workplace: Mitigation tactics and their impact on individuals’ behavior. Information Technology and Management, 1–19.
Kılınç, F. E. (2013). Investigation of the relationship between self-esteem and metacognitive awareness level of 9th grade students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1622–1628.
Kirkpatrick, H., & Cuban, L. (1998). Should we be worried? What the research says about gender differences in access, use, attitudes, and achievement with computers. Educational Technology, 38(4), 56–61.
Koc, M., & Barut, E. (2016). Development and validation of new media literacy scale (NMLS) for university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 834–843.
Krishnan, S., Lim, V. K., & Teo, T. S. (2010). How does personality matter? Investigating the Impact of Big-Five Personality Traits on cyberloafing. Paper presented at the ICIS.
Kwon, M., Kim, D.-J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One, 8(12), e83558.
Lemberger, M. E., & Clemens, E. V. (2012). Connectedness and self-regulation as constructs of the student success skills program in inner-city African American elementary school students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(4), 450–458.
Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48(2), 301–317.
Liberman, B., Seidman, G., Mckenna, K. Y., & Buffardi, L. E. (2011). Employee job attitudes and organizational characteristics as predictors of cyberloafing. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2192–2199.
Lim, V. K. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675–694.
Lim, V. K., & Chen, D. J. (2012). Cyberloafing at the workplace: Gain or drain on work? Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(4), 343–353.
Lim, V. K., & Teo, T. S. (2005). Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: An exploratory study. Information & Management, 42(8), 1081–1093.
Mcandrew, F. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2012). Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2359–2365.
McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39(3), 462–476.
Noyan, C. O., Darçın, A. E., Nurmedov, S., Yılmaz, O., & Dilbaz, N. (2015). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the smartphone addiction scale-short version. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 16, 73–81.
O’Neill, T. A., Hambley, L. A., & Chatellier, G. S. (2014). Cyberslacking, engagement, and personality in distributed work environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 152–160.
Özcan, S., Gökçearslan, Ş., & Yüksel, A. O. (2017, 2017). An investigation of the relationship between cyberloafing and academic motivation among university students. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 733–742.
Özsoy, G., & Ataman, A. (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 1(2), 67–82.
Park, N., & Lee, H. (2012). Social implications of smartphone use: Korean college students’ smartphone use and psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(9), 491–497.
Phillips, J. G., & Reddie, L. (2007). Decisional style and self-reported email use in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2414–2428.
Pindek, S., Krajcevska, A., & Spector, P. E. (2018). Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 147–152.
Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2011). An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning. Psicología Educativa, 17(2), 163–177.
Saban, A. İ., & Yüce, S. G. (2012). Problem solving, metacognition and epistemological beliefs in 6th, 7th and 8th grade students. Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 1402–1428.
Sak, R. (2018). Gender differences in Turkish early childhood teachers’ job satisfaction, job burnout and organizational cynicism. Early Childhood Education Journal, 2018, 1–11.
Samaha, M., & Hawi, N. S. (2016). Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 321–325.
Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers Education, 62, 24–31.
Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95–110.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children's knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 51–79.
Taneja, A., Fiore, V., & Fischer, B. (2015). Cyber-slacking in the classroom: Potential for digital distraction in the new age. Computers & Education, 82, 141–151.
Tanrıverdi, Ö., & Karaca, F. (2018). Investigating the relationships between adolescents’ levels of cognitive absorption and cyberloafing activities according to demographic characteristics. The Turkish Journal of Addictions, 5(2), 285–315.
Varol, F., & Yıldırım, E. (2019). Cyberloafing in higher education: Reasons and suggestions from students’ perspectives. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(1), 129–142.
Vitak, J., Crouse, J., & LaRose, R. (2011). Personal internet use at work: Understanding cyberslacking. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1751–1759.
Wang, H., Zhou, X., Lu, C., Wu, J., Deng, X., & Hong, L. (2011). Problematic internet use in high school students in Guangdong Province, China. PLoS One, 6(5), e19660.
Wang, Z., David, P., Srivastava, J., Powers, S., Brady, C., D’Angelo, J., & Moreland, J. (2012). Behavioral performance and visual attention in communication multitasking: A comparison between instant messaging and online voice chat. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 968–975.
We Are Social and Hootsuite (2017). Digital in 2017: Global overview. January, dostupno na. Retrieved April 24, 2017, from https://www.slideshare.net/wearesocialsg/digital-in-2017-global-overview.
Weatherbee, T. G. (2010). Counterproductive use of technology at work: Information & communications technologies and cyberdeviancy. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1), 35–44.
Wu, J., Mei, W., & Ugrin, J. C. (2018). Student cyberloafing in and out of the classroom in China and the relationship with student performance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 21(3), 199–204.
Yildiz Durak, H. (2019). Cyberloafing in learning environments where online social networking sites are used as learning tools: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2019, 0735633119867766.
Yıldız-Durak, H., & Sarıtepeci, M. (2018). Occupational burnout and cyberloafing among teachers: analysis of personality traits, individual and occupational status variables as predictors. The Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.10.011.
Yılmaz, R., & Yurdugül, H. (2018). Cyberloafing in IT classrooms: Exploring the role of the psycho-social environment in the classroom, attitude to computers and computing courses, motivation and learning strategies. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 530–552.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I declare that I have no conflict of interest. I certify that I have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saritepeci, M. Predictors of cyberloafing among high school students: unauthorized access to school network, metacognitive awareness and smartphone addiction. Educ Inf Technol 25, 2201–2219 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10042-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10042-0