Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are we ready for Gamification? An exploratory analysis in a developing country

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Integrating gamification in the learning process has become a significant factor in the success of teaching, learning, and research in higher education. Education can leverage gamification by enhancing learning management systems to make learning enjoyable and engaging for students. We, however, lack the underpinnings into factors affecting the acceptance of gamification in education. To help solve this, we tested and extended previous acceptance models. Overall, we explored the users’ perception and acceptance of adding gamification to learning among students in higher education. The results show that Image is an insignificant factor in students’ behavioral intention to use gamification. The current paper contributes to the perceptual process for gamification research in learning; deriving implications for gamification application and pioneering research on gamification acceptance in developing countries. We conclude with opportunities, practical and theoretical implications for researchers and practitioners to extend our knowledge of gamification research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexiou, A., & Schippers, M. C. (2018). Digital game elements, user experience and learning: A conceptual framework. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2545–2567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J., & Kennewell, S. (2017). Investigating teacher perceptions of teaching ICT in Wales. Education and Information Technologies, 22(5), 2485–2497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boateng, R., Boateng, S. L., Awuah, R. B., Ansong, E., & Anderson, A. B. (2016). Videos in learning in higher education: Assessing perceptions and attitudes of students at the University of Ghana. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokhari, R. H. (2005). The relationship between system usage and user satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18(2), 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., & Schellens, T. (2010). Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1145–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (P-less-than.05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.49.12.997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science [serial online], 35(8), 982–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Marcos, L., García-Cabot, A., & García-López, E. (2017). Towards the social Gamification of e-learning: A practical experiment. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1), 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, L., Turner, D. E., Gehling, R., & Prince, B. (2010). User experience, satisfaction, and continual usage intention of IT. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(1), 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Proceedings of the CHI 2011. Vancouver, BC, Canada, 10.1145/1979742.1979575.

  • Featherstone, M., & Habgood, J. (2019). UniCraft: Exploring the impact of asynchronous multiplayer game elements in gamification. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 150–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippou, J., Cheong, C., & Cheong, F. (2018). A model to investigate preference for use of Gamification in a learning activity. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22.

  • Fisher, D. J., Beedle, J., & Rouse, S. E. (2013). Gamification: A study of business teacher educators' knowledge of, attitudes toward, and experiences with the gamification of activities in the classroom. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 56(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, T., & Garry, T. (2015). An investigation into gamification as a customer engagement experience environment. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(6/7), 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. B., & Gee, E. R. (2016). A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning. On the Horizon, 24(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, S. H., Chang, J. W., & Lee, C. C. (2013). Designing attractive gamification features for collaborative storytelling websites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(6), 428–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasperson, J. S., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 525–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., Rebentisch, E. S., & Alien, T. J. (1996). A study of technology transfer in a multinational cooperative joint venture. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(1), 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Suh, K. S., & Lee, U. K. (2013). Effects of collaborative online shopping on shopping experience through social and relational perspectives. Information & Management, 50(4), 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kolog, E. A. (2018). Detecting emotions in students’ generated content: An evaluation of EmoTect system. In International Conference on Technology in Education (pp. 235–248). Springer, Singapore. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-0008-0_22. Accessed on 8 Jan 2019.

  • Leaning, M. (2015). A study of the use of games and gamification to enhance student engagement, experience and achievement on a theory-based course of an undergraduate media degree. Journal of Media Practice, 16(2), 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Santhanam, R., & Webster, J. (2017). Toward meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of Gamified information systems. MIS Quarterly, 41(4).

  • Mattingly, B. A., & Lewandowski Jr., G. W. (2013). The power of one: Benefits of individual self-expansion. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(1), 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2, 192–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nousiainen, T., Kangas, M., Rikala, J., & Vesisenaho, M. (2018). Teacher competencies in game-based pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for E-learning in northeastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofosu-Ampong, K., & Boateng, R. (2018). Gamifying Sakai: Understanding game elements for learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Retrieved from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2018/Education/Presentations/4. Accessed on 8 Jan 2019.

  • Peart, D. J., Rumbold, P. L., Keane, K. M., & Allin, L. (2017). Student use and perception of technology-enhanced learning in a mass lecture knowledge-rich domain first-year undergraduate module. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinsloo, M., & Snyder, I. (2007). Young people’s engagement with digital literacies in marginal contexts in a globalized world. Language and Education, 21(3), 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D., Anderson, C., & Raymond, B. (2013). Information technology, materiality, and organizational change: A professional odyssey. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(7), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J., Sorbello, T., & Unsworth, K. (2008). Innovation implementation: The role of technology diffusion agencies. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3(3), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roldán, J. L., & Sánchez-Franco, M. J. (2012). Variance-based structural equation modeling: Guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research. In Research methodologies, innovations and philosophies in software systems engineering and information systems (pp. 193-221). IGI global.

  • Rooney, P. (2012). A theoretical framework for serious game design: Exploring pedagogy, play and fidelity and their implications for the design process. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 2(4), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam, R., Liu, D., & Shen, W. C. M. (2016). Research note—Gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the same. Information Systems Research, 27(2), 453–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setterstrom, A. J., & Pearson, J. M. (2019). Social influence and willingness to pay for massively multiplayer online games: An empirical examination of social identity theory. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Son, M., & Han, K. (2011). Beyond the technology adoption: Technology readiness effects on post-adoption behavior. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1178–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ssekakubo, G., Suleman, H., & Marsden, G. (2011). Issues of adoption: Have E-learning management systems fulfilled their potential in developing countries? In Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Leadership in a Diverse, Multidisciplinary Environment (pp. 231–238). Cape Town, South Africa.: ACM New York. 10.1145/2072221.2072248.

  • Strmečki, D., Bernik, A., & Radošević, D. (2015). Gamification in e-learning: Introducing gamified design elements into e-learning systems. Journal of Computer Science, 11(12), 1108–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R., Barclay, D. W., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies: Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 284–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiblmaier, H., Putz, L. M., & Lowry, P. B. (2018). Research commentary: Setting a definition, context, and theory-based research agenda for the Gamification of non-gaming applications. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 10(3), 129–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF Ghana Report (2017). “Handwashing with Ananse.” Evaluating the effectiveness of a game-based handwashing curriculum to generate learning and behavior change. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/ghana/HWWA_Evaluation_White_Paper.pdf. .

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkijika, S. F., & De Wet, L. (2015). Using a brain-computer interface (BCI) in reducing math anxiety: Evidence from South Africa. Computers & Education, 81, 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, M., & Pallitt, N. (2012). ‘Grand theft South Africa’: Games, literacy and inequality in consumer childhoods. Language and Education, 26(4), 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Asaad, Y., & Dwivedi, Y. (2017). Examining the impact of gamification on intention of engagement and brand attitude in the marketing context. Computers in Human Behaviour, 73, 459–469.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KOA and RB formulated the study idea and developed the conceptual framework. KOA, RB, TAD and EAK designed the data collection instrument and KOA collected the data. KOA, TAD, and EAK analyzed and interpreted the research data. All authors wrote, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Boateng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ofosu-Ampong, K., Boateng, R., Anning-Dorson, T. et al. Are we ready for Gamification? An exploratory analysis in a developing country. Educ Inf Technol 25, 1723–1742 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10057-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10057-7

Keywords

Navigation