Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

To study the impact of Google Classroom as a platform of learning and collaboration at the teacher education level

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of Google Classroom Platform of learning at the teacher education level. Web-Based Learning Environment Inventory (WEBLEI) (Chang and Fisher 1998, 2003) and Google Classroom Evaluation Survey was used in this study. The sample of 60 students consisting of both males and females was collected from one college of education in Jammu city, where teaching-learning process was being conducted using the Google Classroom setup. Data analysis revealed that students could access the learning activities easily, they could communicate with other students in their subject electronically, they could decide when they wanted to learn, and they could work at their own pace. Results also showed that the students could regularly access online resources and they had the autonomy to ask their tutor what they did not understand. Students experienced a sense of satisfaction and achievement and they felt at ease in working collaboratively with other students. The students were also happy to print lectures and exercise materials from resources uploaded by their teachers. Responses to the Google Classroom Evaluation survey showed that the teachers were able to give better individual attention and students developed a group feeling in such a classroom setup. Students also felt that learning through the Google classroom was not boring and it was not a waste of time. They found it to be an effective medium of studying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data and material for the said research is available with the office of our department. The scholar has provided the data with the college which has been collected as part of the Masters Dissertation.

Abbreviations

WEBLEI:

Web Based Learning Environment Inventory.

www:

World Wide Web.

MOBLEI:

Mobile Enhanced Learning Environment Inventory.

TROFLEI:

Technology Rich Outcomes Focussed Learning Environment Inventory.

M.Ed.:

Masters in Education.

M.A:

Master of Arts.

References

  • Abid Azhar, K., & Iqbal, N. (2018). Effectiveness of Google Classroom: Teachers’ perceptions. Prizren Social Science Journal, 2(2), 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Maroof, R. A. S., & Al-Emran, M. (2018). Students acceptance of Google Classroom: An exploratory study using PLS-SEM approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(06), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basher, S. A. O. (2017). The impact of Google classroom application on the teaching efficiency of pre-teachers. Retrieved march 4, 2018 from http://ijsse.com/sites/ default/files/issues/2017/v7i2/Paper-4.Pdf.

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, V., & Fisher, D. L. (1998). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument to evaluate online learning in higher education. Retrieved 27 June, 2019, from http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/cha01098.htm.

  • Chang, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2001). A new learning instrument to evaluate online learning in higher education. In M. Kulske & A. Herrmann (Eds.), New horizons in university teaching and learning (pp. 23–34). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, V., & Fisher, D. L. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In M. S. Khine & D. L. Fisher (Eds.), Technology-Rich Learning Environments A Future Perspective. pp. 1–20. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

  • Chandra, V., Fisher, D., & Chang, V. (2012). Investigating higher education and secondary school web-based learning environments using the WEBLEI. In Le, Thao & Le, Quynh (Eds.) Technologies for Enhancing Pedagogy, Engagement and Empowerment in Education : Creating Learning-Friendly Environments. IGI global, Hershey, PA, pp. 93-105.

  • De Vellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and application. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Google Classroom (n.d.) About google classroom. Retrieved June 6, 2017 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Classroom.

  • Gupta, A., & Fisher, D. (2012). Technology-supported learning environments in science classrooms in India. Learning environment Research, 15(2), 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heggart, K. R., & Yoo, J. (2018). Gettign the most from google classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educator. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerrey, B., & Isakson, J. (2000). The power of the Internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. (report of the web-based education commission). Washington, D.C.: Web-based education commission. Available: http://interact.hpcnet.org/ webcommis Sion/index.Htm.

  • Lajoie, S. P. (2000). Introduction: Breaking camp to find new summits. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls (pp. xv-xxxii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum associates.

  • Oppenheimer, T. (2003). The flickering mind. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C. & Reeves, P. M. (1997). Effective dimensions of interactive learning on the world wide web. In B. H. Kahn (Ed.), Web-based instruction, Englewood cliffs: NJ, educational technology publications, 59–65.

  • Skelton, D. J. (2007). An investigation into the learning environments of blended delivery (e-learning and classroom) in a tertiary environment (doctoral dissertation).Retrieved September 3, 2017 from https://espace.curtin.edu.au/ handle/20.500.11937/555.

  • Snell-Siddle, C. (2012). Tertiary Students’ perceptions of mobile technology enhanced learning environments and associations with outcomes in New Zealand (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved September 4, 2017 from https://espace.curtin. Edu.Au/handle/20.500.11937/1606.

  • Tobin, K. (1998). Qualitative perceptions of learning environments on the world wide web in B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobins (eds.). International Handbook of Science Education, Kluwer academic publishers, United Kingdom, 139-162.

  • Windschitl, M. (1998). The WWW and classroom research: What path should we take? Educational Researcher, 27(1), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the MIER College of Education for providing the facilities to the scholar for conducting this research.

Funding

The funding has been done by the Authors from their own funds and no support has been provided by any external agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author 1 has been responsible for the preparation of the research paper and data analysis part.

Author 2 has been responsible for collection of data, review of literature and preparation of the thesis from which this paper has been developed.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adit Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors do not have any financial or non-financial competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, A., Pathania, P. To study the impact of Google Classroom as a platform of learning and collaboration at the teacher education level. Educ Inf Technol 26, 843–857 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10294-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10294-1

Keywords

Navigation