Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This exploratory study aims to analyse the nature of peer feedback during a collaborative writing assignment, and to identify the possible effects of feedback on the revision of a text written by university students in a blended learning environment. Under analysis are two different graduate courses in academic writing, during which, over a period of a semester, the students (n = 85) were divided into 25 work groups to carry out a co-evaluation assignment with the support of a technology platform. The results obtained indicate that, when collaborative writing includes peer feedback, instead of unidirectional corrections from the teacher, the students respond more reflectively and constructively, they discuss the content they are working with, and, as a result, they make significant changes in their own writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All figures are drawn from the survey conducted during the project. They can be consulted in full, in Spanish, in López-Pellisa et al. 2020b. The translations into English are our own.

  2. All examples are drawn from the qualitative interviews conducted during the project. They can be consulted in full, in Spanish, in López-Pellisa et al. (2020a). The translations into English are our own.

References

  • Álvarez, I., Espasa, A., & Guasch, T. (2012). The value of feedback in improving collaborative writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.510182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert-Drowns, R., Hurley, M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L., & Thouësny, S. (2017). Students’ collaborative peer reviewing in an online writing environment. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustos Sánchez, A. (2004). Un modelo para blended-learning aplicado a la formación en el trabajo. Compartimos prácticas - ¿compartimos saberes? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 7(1–2), 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustos Sánchez, A. (2009). Escritura colaborativa en línea. Un estudio preliminar para el estudio orientado al análisis del proceso de co-autoría. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 12(2), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlino, P. (2008). Leer y escribir en la universidad, una nueva cultura. ¿Por qué es necesaria la alfabetización académica? In E. Narváez & D. Cadena (Eds.), Los desafíos de la lectura y la escritura en la educación superior: caminos posibles (pp. 159–194). Cali: Universidad Autónoma de Occidente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassany, D., & Morales, Ó. (2009). Leer y escribir en la universidad: los géneros científicos. In D. Cassany (Comp.), Para ser letrados. Voces y miradas sobre la lectura (pp. 109–128). Barcelona: Paidós.

  • Castelló, M. (2009). Aprender a escribir textos académicos: ¿copistas, escribas, compiladores o escritores? In J. I. Pozo, & M. Pérez (Coords.), Psicología del aprendizaje universitario: la formación de competencias (pp. 120–133). Madrid: Morata.

  • Crook, C. K., Gross, H., & Dymott, R. (2006). Assessment relationships in higher education: The tension of process and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 32, 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deveci, T. (2018). Student perceptions on collaborative writing in a project-based course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060415.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Devere, T. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dysthe, O., Lillejord, S., Vines, A., & Wasson, B. (2010). Productive e-feedback in higher education. Two models and some critical issues. In A. Ludvigsen, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 243–259). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2010). Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: An exploratory study. Higher Education, 59(3), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch, T., Espasa, A., & Álvarez, I. (2010). Formative e-feedback in collaborative writing assignments: The effect of the process and time. eLC Research Paper Series, 1, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Álvarez, I., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 34(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guasch, T., Espasa, A., & Martínez-Melo, M. (2019). The art of questioning in online learning environments: The potentialities of feedback in writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1479373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herder, A., Berenst, J., de Glopper, K., & Koole, T. (2018). Reflective practices in collaborative writing of primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Rojas, G., & Romero, V. (2011). El b-learning en contextos educativos universitarios: posibilidades de uso. In F. Díaz Barriga, G. Hernández, & M. A. Rigo (Eds.), Experiencias educativas con recursos digitales (pp. 95–119). Ciudad de México: Facultad de Psicología-UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Rojas, G., Sánchez González, P., Rodríguez Varela, E. I., Caballero Becerril, R. S., & Martínez Martínez, M. (2014). Un entorno b-learning para la promoción de la escritura académica de estudiantes universitarios. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 19(61), 349–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, P. D. (2014). Knowledge construction in collaborative science writing: Strategic simplicity, distributed complexity, and explanatory sophistication. In G. E. Rijlaarsdam, P. D. Klein, P. Boscolo, L. C. Kirkpatrick, & C. E. Gelati (Eds.), Studies in writing, writing as a learning activity (Vol. 28, pp. 300–326). Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Pihlajamäki, H. (2003). Can a collaborative network environment enhance essay-writing processes? British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.d01-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K. (2003). Helping doctoral students to finish their theses. In L. Björk, G. Bräuer, L. Rienecker, G. Ruhmann, & P. Stray Jorgensen (Eds.), Teaching academic writing across Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Pellisa, T., Rodríguez-Gallego, F. & Rotger, N. (2020a). Interviews: Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment. Mendeley Data, V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/ygktp8g3g9.1.

  • López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N. & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2020b). Apéndice A: Cuestionario del proyecto de escritura colaborativa. Mendeley Data, V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/xttwsktvcv.1.

  • Mauri, T., Colomina, R., Clara, M., & Ginesta, A. (2011). Ayudas al aprendizaje en tareas de escritura colaborativa con Moodle. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1103–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nokes-Malach, T. J., Richey, J. E., & Gadgil, S. (2015). When is it better to learn together? Insights from research on collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9312-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nykopp, M., Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2014). University students’ knowledge construction during face to face collaborative writing. In P. Klein, P. Boscolo, L. Kirkpatrick, & C. Gelati (Eds.), Writing as a learning activity (pp. 277–299). Leiden: Brill Studies in Writing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña, K., Pérez, M., & Rondón, E. (2010). Redes sociales en Internet: reflexiones sobre sus posibilidades para el aprendizaje cooperativo y colaborativo. Revista de Teoría y Didáctica de las Ciencias Sociales, 16, 173–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. L. (2001). Traditions to transformations: The forced evolution of higher education. AACE Journal, 9(1), 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotger, N., López-Pellisa, T. & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2020). Evaluation Rubric: Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment. Mendeley Data, V3, https://doi.org/10.17632/rz5m25gbvk.3.

  • Sánchez, E. (Coord.). (2010). La lectura en el aula. Barcelona: Graó.

  • Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turpo Gebera, O. W. (2010). Contexto y desarrollo de la modalidad educativa blended learning en el sistema educativo iberoamericano. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15(45), 345–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Steendam, E. (2016). Editorial: Forms of collaboration in writing. Journal of Writing Research, 8(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolsey, T. (2008). Efficacy of instructor feedback on written work in an online program. International Journal on E-learning, 7(2), 311–329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Institute for Educational Research and Innovation (IRIE) of the Universitat de les Illes Balears (Spain) through a teaching innovation project (PID 181960) led by Teresa López-Pellisa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain

    Teresa López-Pellisa & Fernando Rodríguez-Gallego

  2. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

    Neus Rotger

Authors
  1. Teresa López-Pellisa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neus Rotger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fernando Rodríguez-Gallego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando Rodríguez-Gallego.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N. & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Educ Inf Technol 26, 1293–1310 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation