Skip to main content
Log in

Digital games pre-schoolers play: parental mediation and examination of educational content

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine mediations of parents who make digital games played by 60–72 months old children accessible, and the contents of the digital games played by children educationally. In this research the convergent parallel mixed research method that include both qualitative and quantitative research methods was used. The study group of the research consists of 109 parents. In the research, two data collection tools as a survey and a questionnaire were used. The data collection tools were developed by the researchers. Qualitative data of the research consist of parents’ opinions and the digital games their children play. Quantitative data were collected with the questionnaire form. As a consequence of combining quantitative and qualitative data and evaluating them as a meaningful whole, it was established that children of parents using a parental mediation consciously play digital games with educational content. Yet, this rate is below 10%. It was determined that 90% of the parents do not use a mediation strategy consciously. In fact, children who are not applied a mediation play digital games with violent and neutral content. According to the findings, it is another significant result that parents using a mediation strategy consciously choose digital games with educational content by taking expert opinions. The results of the research were discussed in consideration of the literature in terms of both parental mediation and educational content of digital games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera, M. D., & Mendiz, A. (2003). Video games and education: Education in the face of a “parallel school”. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 10–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics. (2013). Children, adolescents, and the media. Pediatrics, 132(5), 958–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aral, N., & Doğan Keskin, A. (2018). Ebeveyn bakış açısıyla 0–6 yaş döneminde teknolojik alet kullanımının incelenmesi. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addiction, 5, 317–348. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2018.5.2.0054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayre, C., & Scally A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development, 47 (1), 79–86. doı: https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808.

  • Ballard, M., Gray, M., Reilly, J., & Noggle, M. (2009). Correlates of video game screen time among males: Body mass, physical activity, and other media use. Eating Behaviors, 10(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2009.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyens, I., Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2019). Developmental trajectories of parental mediation across early and middle childhood. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2016). The influence of TPACK contextual factors on early childhood educators' tablet computer use. Computers & Education, 98, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluemke, M., Friedrich, M., & Zumbach, J. (2010). The influence of violent and nonviolent computer games on implicit measures of aggressiveness. Aggressive Behavior, 36(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Ross, A., & S. Livingstone (2016). Families and screen time: Current advice and emerging research. Media policy brief 17. London: Media Policy Project, London School of Economics and Political Science.

  • Boot, W. R., Kramer, A. F., Simons, D. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychologica, 129(3), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., & Flanagan, S. (2016). Focus on inclusive education: Evaluating apps for students with disabilities: Supporting academic access and success. Childhood Education, 92(4), 324–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratitsis, T. (2018). An attempt for critical categorization of android applications available for the Greek kindergarten. In M. Auer & T. Tsiatsos (Eds.), Interactive Mobile Communication Technologiesand Learning. IMCL 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 725, pp. 56–68). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75175-7_7.

  • Cabello-Hutt, T., Cabello, P., & Claro, M. (2018). Online opportunities and risks for children and adolescents: The role of digital skills, age, gender and parental mediation in Brazil. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2411–2431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817724168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalışkan, Ö., & Özbay, F. (2015). 12-14 yaş aralığındaki ilköğretim öğrencilerinde teknoloji kullanımı eksenli yabancılaşma ve anne baba tutumları: Düzce ili örneği. Journal of International Social Research, 8(39), 441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenal, F., & Lopez, V. (2015). Education apps. One step beyond: It is time for something more in theeducation apps word. In Á. Herrero, B. Baruque, J. Sedano, H. Quintián, & E. Corchado (Eds.), international joint conference: CISIS’15 and ICEUTE’15 (pp. 571–581). Spain: Burgos. century. Melbourne: Victoria University.

  • Chau, C. L. (2014). Positive technological development for young children in the context of children’s mobile apps (doctoral dissertation). Tufts University.

  • Chiong, C., & Shuler, C. (2010). Learning: Is there an app for that? Investigations of young children’s usage and learning with mobile devices and apps. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the building blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 443–494. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastin, M. S., Greenberg, B. S., , & Hofschire, L. (2006). Parenting the internet. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00297.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P., Kastenmüller, A., & Greitemeyer, T. (2010). Media violence and the self: The impact of personalized gaming characters in aggressive video games on aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(1), 192–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2015). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. E., & Schirrmacher, R. (2012). Çocuklarda sanat ve yaratıcılığın gelişimi (N. Aral & G. Duman, Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genç, Z. (2014). Parents’ perceptions about the mobile technology use of preschool aged children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 146, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, D. A. (Ed.). (2003). Advances in applied developmental psychology. Media violence and children: A complete guide for parents and professionals. Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.

  • Gentile, D. A., & Walsh, D. A. (2002). A normative study of family media habits. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(02)00102-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, D. A., Swing, E. L., Lim, C. G., & Khoo, A. (2012). Video game playing, attention problems, and impulsiveness: Evidence of bidirectional causality. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, K., & Highfield, K. (2012). iTouch and iLearn: An examination of “educational” apps. Paper presented at the Early Education and Technology for Children Conference, 14–16 March, Salt Lake City, Utah.

  • Gözüm, A. İ. C., & Kandır, A. (2020). Developing a parental mediation scale of digital games for children. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(2), 336–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423, 534–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2006). Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1465–1468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2007). Action video game experience alters the spatial resolution of attention. Psychological Science, 18, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01853.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (2002). The educational benefits of videogames. Education and Health, 20(3), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guernsey, L., & Levine, M. H. (2016). How digital media can promote literacy instead of undermining it. Retrieved on October 2020 from: http://www.aft.org/ae/fall2016/guernsey_levine.

  • Guernsey, L., Levine, M., Chiong, C., & Severns, M. (2012). Pioneering literacy in the digital wild west: Empowering parents and educators. Washington, DC: Campaign for Grade-Level Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasebrink, U., Görzig, A., Haddon, L., Kalmus, V., & Livingstone, S. (2011). Patterns of risk and safety online: In-depth analyses from the EU kids online survey of 9- to 16-year-olds and their parents in 25 European countries. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Pierce, T. B. (2005). Evaluating software for use by students with disabilities to foster inclusion in general education. In in international special education conference. Inclusive and supportive education congress. Inclusion: Celebrating diversity? Glasgow, Scotland.

  • Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in ‘educational’ apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. S., Chen, L., & Ng, A. P. (2017). Comparing cyberbullying perpetration on social media between primary and secondary school students. Computers & Education, 109, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.004.

  • Hollingsworth, M., & Woodward, J. (1993). Integrated learning : Explicit strategies and their role in problem solving instruction for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 444–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, A., Beschorner, B., & Schmidt-Crawford, D. (2012). Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, K., Hudak, S., & McGiffert, J. (2009). Computer-related posture and musculoskeletal discomfort in middle school students. Work, 32(3), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2009-0826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. & Christensen, L. (2007). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches, 3rd. Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Juul, J. (2010). A casual revolution. Cambridge: The MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., et al. (2015). Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics, 136(6), 1044e1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Smith, D. (2017). Pedagogical and technological augmentation of mobile learning for young children interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1087411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. L., Gradisar, M., Drummond, A., Lovato, N., Wessel, J., Micic, G., Douglas, P., & Delfabbro, P. (2013). The impact of prolonged violent video-gaming on adolescent sleep: An experimental study. Journal of Sleep Research, 22(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2012.01060.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children's internet use in different european countries. Journal of Children and Media, 3(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903233440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucirkova, N. (2014). How to choose the best educational app for your child. Retrieved on October 2020 from: https://goo.gl/cf67ey.

  • Kyriakides, A. O., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Prodromou, T. (2016). Mobile technologies in the service of students' learning of mathematics: The example of game application ALEX in the context of a primary school in Cyprus. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 53e78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, K. (2013). Mathematics Education: Is there an app for that? In V. Steinle, L. Ball, & C. Bardini (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Mathematics education: Yesterday, today and tomorrow, (pp. 426–433). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.

  • Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.-Y., & Cherner, T. S. (2015). A comprehensive evaluation rubric for assessing instructional apps. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 21–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J. S., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children’s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84, 2005–2217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marco, J., Cerezo, E., & Baldassarri, S. (2012). Bringing tabletop technology to all: Evaluating a tangible farm game with kindergarten and special needs children. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0522-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marco, J., Cerezo, E., Baldassarri, S., Mazzone, E., & Read, J. C. (2009). Bringing tabletop technologies to kindergarten children. HCI 2009 (pp. 103–111). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1671011.1671023

  • Masendorf, F. (1993). Training of learning disabled children’s spatial abilities by computer games. Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie, 7, 209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzoni, R. A., Brunborg, G. S., Molde, H., Myrseth, H., Skouverøe, K. J., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2011). Problematic video game use: Estimated prevalence and associations with mental and physical health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14(10), 591–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2016). Nitel veri analizi. (2.Baskı). (S.Akbaba Altun., A.Ersoy, Çev.Ed.). Ankara: Pegem.

  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2013). Okul öncesi eğitim programı. Ankara: MEB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namukasa, I. K., Gadanidis, G., Sarina, V., Scucuglia, S., & Aryee, K. (2016). Selection of apps for teaching difficult mathematics topics: An instrument to evaluate touch-screen tablet and smartphone mathematics apps. In International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp. 275–300). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_12.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2017). The use of touch-screen tablets at home and pre-school to foster emergent literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(2), 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., & Jansz, J. (2014). Developing scales to measure parental mediation of young children's internet use. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(2), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikken, P., Jansz, J., & Schouwstra, S. (2007). Parents' interest in videogame ratings and content descriptors in relation to game mediation. European Journal of Communication, 22(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323107079684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oblinger, D.G., (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004(1), 1-18. 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/2004-8-oblinger.

  • Okolo, C. M. (1992). The effect of computer-assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the arithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 3(4), 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozeke, V. (2018). Evaluation of educational mobile apps for turkish preschoolers from google play store. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(4), 238–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palaiologou, I. (2014). Children under five and digital technologies: Implications for early years pedagogy. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.929876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2017). Mobile educational applications for children. What educators and parents need to know. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation (Special Issue on Mobile Learning Applications and Strategies), 11(3), 256–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2020). A research synthesis of the educational value of self-proclaimed Mobile educational applications for young age children. In S. Papadakis & M. Kalogiannakis (Eds.), Mobile learning applications in early childhood education (pp. 1–19). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1486-3.ch001.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016a). Developing fundamental programming concepts and computational thinking with ScratchJr in preschool education: A case study. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(3), 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016b). Improving mathematics teaching in kindergarten with realistic mathematical education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(3), 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2016c). Comparing tablets and PCs in teaching mathematics: An attempt to improve mathematics competence in early childhood education. Preschool and Primary Education, 4(2), 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2018). Educational apps from the android Google play for Greek preschoolers: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 116, 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, F. (2013). An Art World for Artgames. Loading. The Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association, 7(11), 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowski, J. T. (2017). The parental media mediation context of young children’s media use. In R. Barr & D. N. Linebarger (Eds.), Media exposure during infancy and early childhood: The effects of content and context on learning and development (pp. 205–219). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45102-2_13.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L., Stephen, C., & McPake, J. (2010). Supporting young children’s learning with technology at home and in preschool. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L., Stevenson, O., Stephen, C., & McPake, J. (2012). Preschool children’s learning with technology at home. Computers & Education, 59(1), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V. J., & Saphir, M. (2011). Zero to eight: Children's media use in America. San Francisco: Common Sense Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saracho, O. N. (2015). Developmentally-appropriate technology and interactive media in early childhood education. In K. L. Heider & M. R. Jalongo (Eds.), Young children and families in the information age: Applications of technology in early childhood (pp. 183–205). Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2002). Building blocks for young Children’s mathematical development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.2190/F85EQQXB-UAX4-BMBJ.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2004). Building blocks for early childhood mathematics. EarlyChildhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sari, B., Takacs, Z., & Bus, A. (2017). What are we downloading for our children? Best-selling children’s apps in four European countries. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy; Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417744057.

  • Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design a book of lenses. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield Clark, L. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2014). A matter of record: Documentary sources in social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinkuehler, C. (2010). Video Games and Digital Literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 61–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, C., & Edwards, S. (2018). Young children playing and learning in a digital age: A cultural and critical perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toran, M., Ulusoy, Z., Aydın, B., Deveci, T., & Akbulut, A. (2016). Çocukların Dijital Oyun Kullanımına İlişkin Annelerin Görüşlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(5), 2263–2278 retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefdergi/issue/27735/317834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaala, S., Ly, A., & Levine, M. H. (2015). Getting a Read on the app stores: A market scan and analysis of Children’s literacy apps. Full Report. In Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. Academic Press.

  • Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: “Instructive mediation,” “restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wack, E., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2009). Relationships between electronic game play, obesity, and psychosocial functioning in young men. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. (2001). In words and deeds: Parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing. The Journal of Family Communication, 1, 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327698JFC0104_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. J. P. (2001). Genre and the video game. In M. J. P. Wolf (Ed.), The medium of the video game (pp. 113–134). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yelland, N., Drake, P., & Sadler, K. (2017). Early Learning in STEM: Multimodal learning in the 21st.

  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaranis, N., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Using mobile devices for teaching realistic mathematics in kindergarten education. Creative Education, 4, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali İbrahim Can Gözüm.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gözüm, A.İ.C., Kandır, A. Digital games pre-schoolers play: parental mediation and examination of educational content. Educ Inf Technol 26, 3293–3326 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10382-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10382-2

Keywords

Navigation