Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Writing an expository text using augmented reality: Students’ performance and perceptions

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Writing is a demanding task for learners in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts. Students are not given sufficient practice opportunities in the classroom. Hence, they do not feel motivated to write or enjoy writing in English much, and they encounter difficulties in planning, organizing ideas, stating a clear purpose and choosing appropriate words to express their ideas while composing texts in English. Integrating advanced technologies into instruction can mitigate such problems. The main purpose of this study is to explore whether the use of AR-based materials could contribute to high school students in the process of producing texts in English. The study also seeks to explore students’ perceptions on the use of AR. The study is quasi-experimental in design. The experiment was conducted in two classes of high school students with a B1 level of English proficiency. In total 48 students participated in the study. Following the design of the AR-based materials, the classes were assigned as the experimental (N = 24) and control (N = 24) group. Both groups worked on the same topic at the same time interval. Upon completion of their compositions, the students’ perceptions of the use of AR-based materials were collected via a questionnaire. The statistical analyzes yielded significant differences in the writing scores between the groups. The findings indicated that the use of AR-based materials had a medium effect on the selected writing skills of the students. The results also showed that the students’ perceptions of the AR-based writing experience were positive. The findings suggest that AR-based writing activities increase students’ motivation towards writing, which may result in better performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Ahmed, A. H. (2010). Students’ problems with cohesion and coherence in EFL essay writing in Egypt: Different perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal (LICEJ), 1(4), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akalın, S., & Zengin, B. (2007). Türkiye’de halkın yabancı dil ile ilgili algıları [People's perceptions about foreign languages in Turkey]. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 3(1), 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allagui, B. (2019). Writing a descriptive paragraph using an augmented reality application: An evaluation of students’ performance and attitudes. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09429-2.

  • Alptekin, C., & Tatar, S. (2011). Research on foreign language teaching and learning in Turkey (2005–2009). Language Teaching, 44, 328–353. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481100005X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, D. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31, 599–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. S. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich: Age Information Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkaoui, K. (2007). Teaching writing to second language learners: Insights from theory and research. TESL Reporter, 40, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreira, J., Bessa, M., Pereira, L. C., Adão, T., Peres, E., & Magalhães, L. (2012). MOW: Augmented reality game to learn words in different languages: Case study: Learning English names of animals in elementary school. In 7th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI 2012) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

  • Başoğlu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students' English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitchener, J., & Bastürkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bursalı, H., & Yılmaz, R. M. (2019). Effect of augmented reality applications on secondary school students' reading comprehension and learning permanency. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante, A., & Eom, M. (2017). Linguistically diverse Students' attitudes towards writing in English. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 5(1), 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çetinkaya, H., & Akçay, M. (2013). Eğitim ortamlarında artırılmış gerçeklik uygulamaları [Augmented reality applications in educational environments], XV. In Akademik Bilişim Kongresi [XV academic congress of informatics]. Antalya: Turkey Retrieved from: https://ab.org.tr/ab13/kitap/cetinkaya_akcay_AB13.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çevik, G., Yılmaz, R. M., Göktas, Y., & Gülcü, A. (2017). Okul öncesi dönemde artırılmış gerçeklikle Ingilizce öğrenme [learning English using augmented reality in pre-school period]. Journal of Instructional Technologies and Teacher Education, 6(2), 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. W., Lee, J. H., Wang, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2010). Improving the authentic learning experience by integrating robots into the mixed-reality environment. Computers & Education, 55, 1572–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. P., & Wang, C. H. (2015). The effects of learning style on mobile augmented-reality-facilitated English vocabulary learning. In 2015 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Security (ICISS) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

  • Chen, T. S., Chang, C. S., Lin, J. S., & Yu, H. L. (2009). Context-aware writing in ubiquitous learning environments. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(1), 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Zhou, D., Wang, Y., & Yu, J. (2017). Application of augmented reality for early childhood English teaching. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 111-115). IEEE.

  • Cheng, K. H. (2017). Reading an augmented reality book: An exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S. C., Hwang, W. Y., Wu, S. Y., Shadiev, R., & Xie, C. H. (2010). A mobile device and online system with contextual familiarity and its effects on English learning on campus. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimasko, T., & Reichelt, M. (Eds.). (2011). Foreign language writing instruction: Principles and practices. Anderson: Parlor Press.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39(1), 81–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, A. (2001). Learning to write in a second language: Two decades of research. International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 1–23.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dalim, C. S. C., Dey, A., Piumsomboon, T., Billinghurst, M., & Sunar, S. (2016). TeachAR: An interactive augmented reality tool for teaching basic English to non-native children. In IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-adjunct) (pp. 82-86). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0046.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

  • DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirel, E. T. (2017). Detection of common errors in Turkish EFL Students' writing through a Corpus analytic approach. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. In Z. Dörnyei (Ed.), Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications (pp. 3–32). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkan, D. Y., & Saban, A. İ. (2011). Writing performance relative to writing apprehension, self-efficacy in writing, and attitudes towards writing: A correlational study in Turkish tertiary-level EFL. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 13(3), 164–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. (2013). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student’s contributions to second-language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800000045.

  • Garzón, J., & Acevedo, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of the impact of augmented reality on students’ learning effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 27, 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Augmented reality and language learning: From annotated vocabulary to placed-based mobile game. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haznedar, B. (2012). Perspective on Preservice education of English language teachers in Turkish primary schools. In Y. Bayyurt, & Y. Bektas-Çetinkaya (Eds.), Research perspective on teaching and learning English in Turkey (pp. 39-57). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

  • Hsieh, M. C., & Lee, J. S. (2008). AR marker capacity increasing for kindergarten English learning. Hong Kong: Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. U.K: Cambridge University press.

  • Hyland, K. (2011). Learning to write: Issues in theory, research and pedagogy. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1, 1–26.

  • Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, B. (Ed.). (1990). Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom. U.K: Cambridge University Press.

  • Küçük, S., Yılmaz, R. M., & Göktaş, Y. (2014). Augmented reality for learning English: Achievement, attitude and cognitive load levels of students. Education & Science, https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3595.

  • Kurt, G., & Atay, D. (2007). The effects of peer feedback on the writing anxiety of prospective Turkish teachers of EFL. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3(1), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M., & Park, M. (2019). Reconceptualization of the context in language learning with a location-based AR app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33, 936–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1602545.

  • Lee, L. K., Chau, C. H., Chau, C. H., & Ng, C. T. (2017). Using augmented reality to teach kindergarten students English vocabulary. In 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 53-57). IEEE.

  • Leki, I. (2001). Hearing voices: L2 students’ experiences in L2 writing courses. In Silva T and Matsuda P.K (Eds), On second language writing, (pp. 17–28). New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Liu, T. Y. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00329.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55, 630–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023.

  • Liu, P. E., & Tsai, M. (2013). Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, E1–E4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01302.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchón, R. (Ed.). (2009). Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (Vol. 43). UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Manchón, R. M., & de Haan, P. J. M. (2008). Writing in foreign language contexts: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes: Implications for theory. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (Vol. 43) (pp. 102–129). UK: Multilingual Matters.

  • Mendoza López, E. (2005). Current state of the teaching of process writing in EFL classes: An observational study in the last two years of secondary school 1. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 6, 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghdipour, B. (2016). English writing instruction in Iran: Implications for second language writing curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.05.001

  • Nishino, T., & Atkinson, D. (2015). Second language writing as sociocognitive alignment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 33(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., Kazanidis, I., & Wells, D. (2018). Augmenting the learning experience in primary and secondary school education: A systematic review of recent trends in augmented reality game-based learning. Virtual Reality, 23, 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0347-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B. (2015). Gamifying French language learning: A case study examining a quest-based, augmented reality mobile learning-tool. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2308–2315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, M. (1999). Toward a more comprehensive view of L2 writing: Foreign language writing in the US. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80127-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, M. (2005). English-language writing instruction in Poland. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelt, M., Lefkowitz, N., Rinnert, C., & Schultz, J. M. (2012). Key issues in foreign language writing. Foreign Language Annals, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01166.x.

  • Santos, M. E. C., Lübke, A. W., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Sandor, C., & Kato, H. (2016). Augmented reality as multimedia: The case for situated vocabulary learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0028-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. (2004). A multiple-data analysis of the 3.5-year development of EFL student writers. Language Learning, 54(3), 525–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. (1996). Explanatory variables for EFL students' expository writing. Language Learning, 46(1), 137–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherafati, N., Largani, F. M., & Amini, S. (2020). Exploring the effect of computer-mediated teacher feedback on the writing achievement of Iranian EFL learners: Does motivation count? Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4591–4613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10177-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solak, E., & Bayar, A. (2015). Current challenges in English language learning in Turkish EFL context. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 2(1), 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solak, E., & Cakır, R. (2015). Exploring the effect of materials designed with augmented reality on language learners' vocabulary learning. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701745817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarnopolsky, O. (2000). Writing English as a foreign language: A report from Ukraine. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00026-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal, H. H. (2012). Argumentation across L1 and L2 writing: Exploring cultural influences and transfer issues. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 133–159.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vate-U-Lan, P. (2012). An augmented reality 3D pop-up book: The development of a multimedia project for English language teaching. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (pp. 890-895). IEEE.

  • Vincent, J. (2001). The role of visually rich technology in facilitating children's writing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. H. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of integrating augmented reality-based materials to support writing activities. Computers & Education, 113, 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. H. (2019). The applications and effects of learning English through augmented reality: A case study of Pokémon go. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1642211.

  • Xu, Z., Banerjee, M., Ramirez, G., Zhu, G., & Wijekumar, K. (2019). The effectiveness of educational technology applications on adult English language learners’ writing quality: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32, 132–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1501069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, Z. A., & Batdı, V. (2016). A meta-analytic and thematic comparative analysis of the integration of augmented reality applications into education. Education and Science, https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.6707.

  • You, X. (2004). New directions in EFL writing: A report from China. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabihi, R. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35, 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the reviewers and editors for their time spent on reviewing our manuscript and their comments helping us improving the article.

Funding

This study was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) as part of 2209A Research Projects Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Velibaba Anatolian High School, Ministry of Education, İstanbul, Turkey

    Özge Koç

  2. Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Ramo della Palada, 392/A Giudecca, 30133, Venice, Italy

    Emin Altun

  3. Department of Foreign Languages Education, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey

    H. Gülru Yüksel

Authors
  1. Özge Koç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emin Altun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Gülru Yüksel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Özge Koç or H. Gülru Yüksel.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koç, Ö., Altun, E. & Yüksel, H.G. Writing an expository text using augmented reality: Students’ performance and perceptions. Educ Inf Technol 27, 845–866 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10438-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10438-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation