Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Determinants predicting undergraduates’ intention to adopt e-learning for studying english in chinese higher education context: A structural equation modelling approach

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explores the determinants that predict undergraduates’ intention to adopt e-learning for studying English on the basis of the extended technology acceptance model. The survey is conducted on 199 undergraduates. Structural equation modelling is performed to evaluate the proposed hypotheses and the validity of the broadened model. The results show that in addition to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, the intrinsic motivation factor of perceived enjoyment and extrinsic motivation factor of social influence can also determine students’ intention to apply e-learning for studying English. Furthermore, perceived enjoyment exerts a significant direct influence on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Percieved ease of use significantly and directly affects perceived usefulness, and however, perceived usefulness is not positively related to intention. The extended model is found to have good predictive validity. This study contributes to better comprehending Chinese undergraduates’ intention to implement e-learning for English studies, and it extends technology acceptance model by incorporating motivation variables of perceived enjoyment and social influence, which can be applied as a theoretical framework in future research in education context. Furthermore, this study provides universities and teachers with several recommendations on encouraging students to take up e-learning to study English for achieving more positive outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behaviour, 63, 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, T. (2010). E-learning as a new technological application in higher education and research: An empirical study and proposed model. The International Academic Research Journal, 2, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2012). Implementing e-learning in the Jordanian higher education systems: Factors affecting impact. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M., & Kidd, C. (1997). Individual characteristics associated with world wide web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivation. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 28(2), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (2001). National strategies for e-learning in post-secondary education and training (Vol. 132). Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating Students to Learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. V. (2007). Psychology of motivation. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, G. C., & Kumar, A. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 553–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, K., & Blatnik, S. (2005). E-learning and economic development. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(1), 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., & Tseng, H. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35, 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. L., Liu, E. Z. F., Shih, R. C., Wu, C. T., & Yuan, S. M. (2011). Use of peer feedback to enhance elementary students’ writing through blogging. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), E1–E4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behaviour. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction: proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNNIC. (2020). The 45th statistical survey report on the internet development in China. http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202004/t20200428_70974.htm

  • Conati, C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of users’ emotions in education games. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16(7), 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. J. (2012). Formal to informal learning with IT: research challenges and issues for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 29–51.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(4), 1111–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information and Management, 36(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, Y., He, Q., Fong, W., Li, D., & Fu, Z. (2010). A study on e-learning take-up intention from an innovation adoption perspective: A case of China. Computers & Education, 55, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2015). The Acceptance of e-learning as a tool for teaching and learning in Libyan higher education. International Journal of Information Technology, 3(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, E. (2005). Adapting to changing expectations: Postgraduate students’ experience of an e-learning tax program. Computers & Education, 45(2), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006.). Multivariate data analysis (6th). Uppersaddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10959–10966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments conceptual foundations: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifinedo, P. (2017). Examining students' intention to continue using blogs for learning: Perspectives from technology acceptance, motivational, and social-cognitive frameworks. Computers in Human Behaviour, 72 189-199.

  • Igbaria, M., Liveri, J., & Margahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? Information and Management, 5, 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismaila, N. Z., Razaka, M. R., Zakariaha, Z., Aliasa, N., & Aziz, M. N. (2012). E-learning continuance intention among higher learning institution students’ in malaysia. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 67, 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M., & Hanson, J. (2003). E-learning series: A guide for senior managers. Learning and Teaching Support Network (LSTN) Generic Centre, UK.

  • Katz, Y. J. (2002). Attitudes affecting college students’ preferences for distance learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, B. H. (2001). A framework for web-based learning. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. S., & Malhotra, N. K. (2005). A longitudinal model of continued IS use: an integrative view of four mechanisms underlying post adoption phenomena. Management Science, 51(5), 741–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43, 740–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koç, T., Turan, A. H., & Okursoy, A. (2016). Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system in higher education: An empirical study with structural equation modeling. The International Journal of Management Education, 14(3), 286–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behaviour. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. (2014). University staff adoption of iPad: An empirical study using an extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. Y., & Ryu, H. (2013). Learner acceptance of a multimedia-based learning system. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(6), 419–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.-C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54, 506–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2013). E-learning in English classroom: Investigating factors impacting on ESL (English as Second Language) college students’ acceptance and use of the Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment (Moodle). Master thesis. Iowa: Iowa State University.

  • Lou, S.-J., Wu, S.-C., Shih, R.-C., & Tseng, K.-H. (2010). Adoption of blogging by chinese language composition class in a vocational high school in taiwan. Australian Journal of Education Technology, 26(6), 898–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Zhou, T., & Wang, B. (2009). Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behaviour, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, W. W. K., Andersson, R., & Streith, K. O. (2005). Examining user acceptance of computer technology: an empirical study of student teachers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(6), 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado, U., Khan, G., Moon, J., & Rho, J. (2011). E-learning motivation and educational portal acceptance in developing countries. Online Information Review, 35, 66–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management., 38(4), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasri, W., & Charfeddine, L. (2012). An Exploration of Facebook.Com Adoption in Tunisia Using Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(5), 948–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, N. (2010). Adoption and use of computer-based voice over internet protocol phone service: Toward an integrated model. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 40–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding University students’ behavioural intention to use e-Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. (1991). The social contexts of internalization: Parent and teacher influences on autonomy, motivation and learning. Advances in motivation and achievement, 7 115-149.

  • Sánchez, R. A., & Hueros, A. D. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 1632–1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šumak, B., Hericko, M., & Pušnik, M. (2011). A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: the role of user types and e-learning technology types. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27, 2067–2077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. C., Tsay, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarhini, A., Hone, K. S., & Liu, X. (2013). Factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning environments in developing countries: a structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(1), 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modelling approach. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1645–1653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G., & Lai, R. Y. C. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage. Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 27(1), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trombley, K. B., & Lee, D. (2002). Web-based learning in corporations: Who is using it and why, who is not and why not? Journal of Educational Media, 27(3), 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28, 695–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 479–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Speier, C. (2000). Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 991–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. G. (2002). User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences, 33(2), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vululleh, P. (2018). Determinants of students’ e-learning acceptance in developing countries: An approach based on Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 14(1), 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, Z., Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2008). Why people benefit from e-learning differently: The effects of psychological processes on e-learning outcomes. Information & Management, 45(8), 513–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., Lu, Y. B., Wang, B., & Huang, W. (2011). What makes them happy and curious online? An empirical study on highschool students’ Internet use from a self-determination theory perspective. Computers & Education, 56, 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Foreign Languages, Zhaoqing University, Duanzhou District, Zhaoqing, 526061, Guangdong, China

    Chunming Li & Limin He

  2. School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-Sen University, Tangzhou Rd.1, Zhuhai, Guangdong, China

    IpKin Anthony Wong

Authors
  1. Chunming Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Limin He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. IpKin Anthony Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Li, C.M.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Writing Original Draft, Visualization, Writing—Review & Editing.

He, L. M.: Investigation, Validation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing.

Wong, Ip. A.: Methodology, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Limin He.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., He, L. & Wong, I.A. Determinants predicting undergraduates’ intention to adopt e-learning for studying english in chinese higher education context: A structural equation modelling approach. Educ Inf Technol 26, 4221–4239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10462-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10462-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation