Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of instructional methods on pre-service science teachers learning outcomes: a meta-analysis

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Best instructional methods are essential tools to bring desirable changes in pre-service science teachers. The available literature lacks enough meta-analytic review illustrating the effect of various instructional methods on pre-service science teachers' learning outcomes. This meta-analytic review identified instructional methods used for teaching pre-service science teachers the period  from 2010 to 2020. A specific purpose of the study  was to estimate their magnitude effect on pre-service science teacher’s learning outcomes. This study was a meta-analytic review, whereby one hundred twelve (112) studies were selected from Google scholar, Eric, and Science Direct. They were subjected to the screening process that removed twenty-six records like book chapters, conference abstracts, and duplicates. From eighty-six remained studies, inclusion criteria rejected sixty-one; thus, only twenty-five (25) of them reached the analysis stages and were reviewed. The data from each study were systematically analyzed, and a comprehensive meta-analysis was used to compute effect size according to Cohen’s d. The effect level of twenty instructional methods on eighteen learning outcomes were identified. The 5E instructional model, argument-driven inquiry-based laboratory instruction, socio-scientific issues-based instruction, jigsaw method, instructional technology, and material design course, simulation-assisted laboratory instruction, argumentation-based instruction, field-based inquiry focused model of instruction, and documentary films-based instruction were determined to be the most effective than traditional methods. Their Cohen’s d ranged from 0.8 to 2. Instructional methods with a moderate effect level like problem-based learning were identified. Implication for research and practice is the recommendation of their use for teaching pre-service science teachers based on their influencing ability. Instructional methods with very small effect (Cohen’s d = 0.16) and small effect d = 0.2 were realized. Researchers are recommended to choose study designs and teaching contexts that allow an instructional method to prove its maximal effect. The study focused only on pre-service science teachers as participants. This calls for other meta-analyses to incorporate other domains of pre-service teacher’s education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Aidoo, B., Boateng, S. K., Kissi, P. S., & Ofori, I. (2016). Effect of problem-based learning on students’ achievement in chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(33), 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan, B., Zengin, F. K., & Keçeci, G. (2019). Using stem applications for supporting integrated teaching knowledge of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(2), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. C., Humlum, M. K., & Nandrup, A. B. (2016). Increasing instruction time in school does increase learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(27), 7481–7484. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516686113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anil, Ö., & Batdi, V. (2015). A comparative meta-analysis of 5E and traditional approaches in Turkey. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i6.1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arsal, Z. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1326–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1329564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad, N., & Barak, M. (2018). Pre-service science teachers learn a science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)-oriented program: The case of sound, waves and communication systems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1431–1451. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydeniz, M., & Dogan, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of argumentation on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00170f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydeniz, M., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing pre- service science teachers’ understanding of scientific argumentation: What do they know about argumentation after four years of college science? Science Education International, 26(2), 217–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayvacı, H. Ş, & Özbek, D. (2019). The effect of documentary films on preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Science Learning, 2(3), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i3.17998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. (2019). Social constructivism. The Globalization of World Politics, 2006, 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198825548.003.0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baş, Ö., & Sevim, S. (2020). The effect of argumentation-based learning environments on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding and decision making styles. Higher Education Studies, 10(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n2p66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bektaşli, B. (2013a). The effect of media on preservice science teachers’ attitudes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bektaşli, B. (2013b). The effect of media on preservice science teachers’ attitudes toward astronomy and achievement in astronomy class. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benli, E., & Sarikaya, M. (2012). The investigation of the effect of problem based learning to the academic achievement and the permanence of knowledge of prospective science teacher: The problem of the boiler stone. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4317–4322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, C. W. (2000a). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, C. W. (2000b). A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement Craig. Journal of Chemical Educationcal, 77(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2307/40117504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, A. (2017). The effects of learning activities based on argumentation on conceptual understanding of 7th graders about “force and motion” unit and establishing thinking friendly classroom environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.3.367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çakır, M. (2017). Investigating prospective teachers’ perceived problem-solving abilities in relation to gender, major, place lived, and locus of control. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(6), 1030–1038. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050616

  • Calik-Uzun, S., Kul, U., & Celik, S. (2019). The impact of instructional technology and material design course on pre-service teachers. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. D. (2015). Comparison of student learning outcomes assessment practices used globally. Athens Journal of Education, 2(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.2-3-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayci, B., Faculty, E., Halisdemir, N. O., Planning, H. E., & Board, C. (2020). A study on the effectiveness of a teaching based on socio-scientific issues in the training of pre-service teachers. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(2), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i2.4604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2011). The effect of computer assisted instruction in teaching ionic compounds on pre-service elemantary science teachers’ academic achievement and permanent learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çenberci, S., & Yavuz, A. (2018). The correlation between the creative thinking tendency of mathematics teacher candidates and their attitudes towards instructional technologies and material design lesson. World Journal of Education, 8(3), 95. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n3p95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin, P. S. (2014). Research in science and technological education explicit argumentation instruction to facilitate conceptual understanding and argumentation skills. Research in Science and Technological Education, 32(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.850071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çetinkaya, M., & Özyürek, C. (2019). The effect of inquiry-based science activities on prospective science teachers’ scientific process skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 6(1), 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chibabi, A. A., Umoru, S. E., Onah, D. O., & Itodo, E. E. (2018). Effect of laboratory method on students ’ achievement and retention in senior secondary schools biology In Kogi East Senatorial Zone. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 8(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0806013139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çimer, A. (2007). Effective teaching in science: A review of literature. Journal of Turikish Science Education, 4(1), 20–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çınar, D., & Bayraktar, Ş. (2014). Evaluation of the effects of argumentation based science teaching on 5th grade students’ conceptual understanding of the subjects related to ’matter and change’. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.06465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davut Gul, M., & Akcay, H. (2020). Structuring a new socioscientific issues (SSI) based instruction model: Impacts on pre-service science teachers’ (PSTs) critical thinking skills and dispositions. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demircioğlu, T., & Uçar, S. (2012). The effect of argument-driven inquiry on pre-service science teachers’ attitudes and argumentation skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5035–5039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratory instruction. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel, M., & Dağyar, M. (2016). Effects of problem-based learning on attitude: A meta-analysis study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(8), 2115–2137. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1293a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrios, B., Labros, S., Nikolaos, K., Maria, K., & Athanasios, K. (2013). Traditional teaching methods vs teaching through the application of information and communication technologies in the accounting field: Quo vadis? European Scientific Journal, 9(28), 73–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorgu, T. E. (2016). Different teaching methods: A panacea for effective curriculum implementation in the classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(6–1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.s.2015030601.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, L., & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. Science Education Review, 3(2), 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elaldı, Ş, & Batdı, V. (2016). Comparing effects of different applications on pre-service teachers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(7), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erenler, S., & Cetin, P. S. (2019). Utilizing argument-driven-inquiry to develop pre-service teachers’ metacognitive awareness and writing skills. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(2), 628–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eymur, G. (2018). Developing high school students’ self-efficacy and perceptions about inquiry and laboratory skills through argument-driven inquiry. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(5), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güler, B., & Şahin, M. (2019). Using inquiry-based experiments to improve pre-service science teachers’ science process skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.212.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidich, A.-B. (1944). Meta-analysis in medical research. British Medical Journal, 1(4346), 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.4346.572-a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Henie, M. I., & Sutomo, H. (2015). Argument-driven inquiry with scaffolding as the development strategies of argumentation and critical thinking skills of students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 1195–1192. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-9-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal, M. Z., & Asghar, M. Z. (2020). A study of the significant factors affecting pre-service teacher education in Turkey. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(1), 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwanto, S. A. D., Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2019). Using inquiry-based laboratory instruction to improve critical thinking and scientific process skills among preservice elementary teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(80), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.80.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itangishatse, J., & Kizito, N. (2019). Developing Achievement and Interest in Learning Entrepreneurship in Rwanda: An Action Research Field Trip. A Journal of Contemporary Research, 16(1), 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeronen, E., Palmberg, I., & Yli-Panula, E. (2016). Teaching methods in biology education and sustainability education including outdoor education for promoting sustainability—A literature review. Journal of Education Sciences, 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karacop, A., & Diken, E. H. (2017). The effects of Jigsaw technique based on cooperative learning on prospective science teachers’ science process skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakoç, B., Eryılmaz, K., Turan Özpolat, E., & Yıldırım, İ. (2020). The effect of game-based learning on student achievement: A meta-analysis study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09471-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karami, M., Pakmehr, H., & Aghili, A. (2012). Another view to importance of teaching methods in curriculum: Collaborative learning and students ’ critical thinking disposition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3266–3270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, F., & Ghoraishi, M. (2012). Comparison of problem-based learning approach and traditional teaching on attitude, misconceptions and mathematics performance of university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3852–3856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidron, Y., Lindsay, J., & (ED), R. E. L. A. (2014). The effects of increased learning time on student academic and nonacademic outcomes: Findings from a meta-analytic review. REL 2014–015. Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia, July. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED545233&site=ehost-live

  • Kostiainen, E., Ukskoski, T., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., Kauppinen, M., Kainulainen, J., & Mäkinen, T. (2018). Meaningful learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuvac, M., & Koc, I. (2019). The effect of problem-based learning on the metacognitive awareness of pre-service science teachers. Educational Studies, 45(5), 646–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1509783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledesma, R. D., Macbeth, G., & Cortada de Kohan, N. (2009). Computing effect size measures with ViSta-the visual statistics system. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.05.1.p025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Chuo, H., & Kamisah, O. (2013). A conceptual framework for the integration of 21st century skills in biology education. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 6(16), 2976–2983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, A. (2004). Learning outcomes in higher education: Implications for curriculum design and student learning. The Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism, 3(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.3794/johlste.32.78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmia, W., Makatita, S. H., Lisaholit, S., Azwan, A., Magfirah, I., Tinggapi, H., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2019). Problem-based learning as an effort to improve student learning outcomes. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(9), 1140–1143. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3457426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manasia, L., Ianos, M. G., & Chicioreanu, T. D. (2020). Pre-Service teacher preparedness for fostering education for sustainable development: An empirical analysis of central dimensions of teaching readiness. Sustainability, 2020(12), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L. L., & Amadalo, M. M. (2020). Students ’ conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism and its implications : A review. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v15ii2.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergler, A. G., Spooner-lane, R., & Spooner-lane, R. (2012). What pre-service teachers need to know to be effective at values-based education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8), 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesi, I., Kinay, İ, Şimşek, Ö., Bağçeci, B., & Çetin, B. (2015). Examination of the attitudes of prospective teachers towards instructional technologies and material design (ITMD) course in terms of some variables. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulyanto, H., Gunarhadi, G., & Indriayu, M. (2018). The effect of problem based learning model on student mathematics learning outcomes viewed from critical thinking skills. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(2), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.408454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwangu, E. C., & Sibanda, L. (2017). Teaching biology practical lessons in secondary schools: A case study of five Mzilikazi District Secondary Schools in Bulawayo Metropolitan Province, Zimbabwe. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/ajis-2017-0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, G., Kunz, G., Levy, R., Harwood, D., & Carlson, D. (2008). The Impact of a field-based , inquiry-focused model of instruction on preservice teachers. Science Learning and Attitudes 12(2).

  • Nurutdinova, A. R., Perchatkina, V. G., Zinatullina, L. M., Zubkova, G. I., & Galeeva, F. T. (2016). Innovative teaching practice: Traditional and alternative methods (challenges and implications). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(10), 3807–3819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nzeyimana, J. C., & Ndihokubwayo, K. (2019). Teachers ’ role and learners ’ responsibility in teaching and learning science and elementary technology in Rwanda. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyelekan, O. S., Igbokwe, E. F., & Olorundare, A. S. (2017). Science teachers’ utilisation of innovative strategies for teaching senior school science in Ilorin, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdilek, Z., & Bulunuz, N. (2009). The effect of a guided inquiry method on pre-service teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(2), 24–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qomariyah, S. N. (2019). Effect of problem based learning learning model to improve student learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 2009, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.518056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation. Psychological Science, 11(6), 446–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. (2010). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saputro, A. D., Irwanto, S. A., & Wilujeng, I. (2019). The impact of problem solving instruction on academic achievement and science process skills among prospective elementary teachers. Elementary Education Online, 18(2), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.561896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraç, H. (2018). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics-STEM educational practices on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 125–142.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sariah Syed Hassan, S., & Abdullahi Ibrahim, A. (2018). The art of teaching science in secondary schools: A Meta analysis. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). Very large and huge effect sizes. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, T., & Schwarz, M. A. (2019). The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(APR), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selçuk, G. S. (2010a). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ achievement, approaches and attitudes towards learning physics. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 5(6), 711–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selçuk, G. S. (2010b). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ achievement, approaches and attitudes towards learning physics. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5(June), 711–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şen, C., & Vekli, G. S. (2016). The impact of inquiry based instruction on science process skills and self-efficacy perceptions of pre-service science teachers at a University level biology laboratory. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solbes, J., Torres, N., & Traver, M. (2018). Use of socio-scientific issues in order to improve critical thinking competences. 19(1), 1–22.

  • Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30(November 2019), 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susanto, R., Rachmadtullah, R., & Rachbini, W. (2020). Technological and pedagogical models: Analysis of factors and measurement of learning outcomes in education. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taşlidere, E. (2015). A study investigating the effect of treatment developed by integrating the 5E and simulation on pre-service science teachers’ achievement in photoelectric effect. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(4), 777–792. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1367a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temel, S. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412120936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulbure, C. (2011). Differentiated instruction for pre-service teachers: An experimental investigation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 448–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulukök, Ş, & Sari, U. (2016). The effect of simulation-assisted laboratory applications on pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards science teaching. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulukök, Ş, & Uğur, S. (2016). The effect of simulation-assisted laboratory applications on pre-service teachers ’ attitudes towards science teaching. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uwizeyimana, D., Yadav, L., Musengimana, T., & Uwamahoro, J. (2018). The impact of teaching approaches on effective physics learning: An investigation conducted in five Secondary Schools in Rusizi District, Rwanda. Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallee, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., & Sorbets, E. (2020). Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2196/16504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veselinovska, S. S., Gudeva, L. K., & Djokic, M. (2011). The effect of teaching methods on cognitive achievement in biology studying. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2521–2527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., Grooms, J., Anderson, B., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry in undergraduate chemistry labs: the impact on students’ conceptual understanding, argument skills, and attitudes toward science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 74–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of learning and teaching what do they mean for educators ? In National Education Association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495823.pdf%0D

  • Yalçin, F. A., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2012). The effect of 5e learning model on pre-service science teachers’ achievement in the subject of solutions. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 867–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yangin, S., & Erdogan, R. T. (2019). Pre-service teachers about plants ’ classification. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences., 14(3), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v14i3.3836

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Corresponding author received the support from the African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Leaning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS), University of Rwanda College of education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to this study. Data can be provided when a need be.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josiane Mukagihana.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

We have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mukagihana, J., Nsanganwimana, F. & Aurah, C.M. Effect of instructional methods on pre-service science teachers learning outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educ Inf Technol 27, 2137–2163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10696-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10696-9

Keywords

Navigation