Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A framework for evaluating business lead users’ virtual reality innovations in Second Life

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper extends von Hippel’s (Manag. Sci. 32(7):791–805, 1986) concept of lead users to a virtual reality environment. Three lead user groups, site developers, business firms and avatars, have a synergistic role to play in extending virtual reality from a social networking platform to a commercial one. The paper proposes a framework for assessing the extent to which innovative practices have been demonstrated by lead user business firms in a virtual setting. It applies the framework to twenty pioneering firms that operated within Second Life in 2007, from an avatar’s perspective. The study’s findings indicate that business firms made little use of digital agents, and provided few examples of bricolage. However, they exhibited higher levels of innovation in their use of telepresence and interactivity, which contributed to the achievement of flow. As a single-avatar study, the paper has limited generalizability, however studies with a wider scope will enable further development of this framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams, C. (2007). Consumers lead the charge in bringing virtual reality to the mainstream through second life. Gartner Research Publication, June 4, ID No. G00147936.

  2. Anonymous (2007). Second life, growth strategies—feature. Santa Monica, Feb. 1998, p. 2.

  3. Brait, R. A. (2004). Lead users as a source of innovation. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 12(2), 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, D. (2005). Living in virtual communities: an ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 148–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business research: qualitative and quantitative methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Choi, S. Y., Stahl, D.O., & Whinston, A. B. (1997). The economics of electronic commerce. Indianapolis: Macmillan Technical Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Desouza, K. C., Awazu, Y., Jha, S., Dombrowski, C., Papagari, S., Baloh, P., & Kim, J. Y. (2008). Customer-driven innovation. Research-Technology Management, 51(3), 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2005). Maing innovation dynamics in hospitals. Research Policy, 34(6), 817–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fenn, J., Raskino, M., Davies, J., O’Donovan, P., Fiering, L., Schlegel, K., Andrews, W., Cramoysan, S., Morrison, S., Costello, R., Jopling, E., Williams, M., Kolsky, E., Kitagawa, M., Tully, J., Ball, R. J. G., Bell, T., Filho, W., & Prentice, S. (2007). Hype cycle for human-computer interaction. Gartner Research Publication, ID No. G00148734.

  13. Filho, W. A. D. A., Drakos, N., & Lundy, J. (2006). What virtual worlds have to do with your business life. Gartner Research Publication, Dec. 22, ID No. G00145046.

  14. Franke, N., & von Hippel, E. (2003). Satisfying heterogeneous user needs via innovation toolkits: the case of Apache security softward. Research Policy, 32(7), 1199–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, J. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations: a test of lead-user theory. The Journal of Production Innovation Management, 23, 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Füller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., & Muhlbacher, H. (2006). Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electronic Commerce Research, 6, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gammack, J., & Hodkinson, C. (2003). Virtual reality, involvement and the consumer interface. Journal of End User Computing, 15(4), 78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003). Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how useres benefit by freely revealing their innovations. Research Policy, 32(10), 1753–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hemp, P. (2006). Avatar-based marketing. Harvard Business Review, 84(6), 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hicks, D., & Hegde, D. P. (2005). Highly innovative small firms in the markets for technology. Research Policy, 34(5), 703–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirsch, P. (2007). Second Life issues mirror ‘first life’. PRweek (US ed.) New York, 10(7), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2001). A new marketing paradigm for electronic commerce. The Information Society, 13, 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Communication of the ACM, 42(4), 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Howes, A., Miles, G. E., Payne, S. J., Mitchell, C. D., & Davies, A. J. (2001). Incidental memory and navigation in panoramic virtual reality for electronic commerce. Human Factors, 43(2), 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Intrachooto, S. (2004). Lead users concept in building design: its applicability to member selection in technologically innovative projects. The TQM Magazine, 16(5), 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Itzkoff, D. (2007). A brave new world for TV? Virtually [1]. New York Times, 24, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kannebley, S., Port, G. S., & Pazello, E. T. (2005). Characteristics of Brazilian innovative firms: an empirical analysis based on PINTEC—industrial research on technological innovation. Research Policy, 34(7), 872–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kryhul, A. (2007). Life, or something like it. Marketing—Opinion at Large, Feb. 12, 112(3), 15.

  30. Lakhani, K. R., & von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32(6), 923–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Levine, J. (2007). Presence in the 2.0 World. Library Technology Reports, 43(5), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2001). Characteristics of virtual experience in electronic commerce: a protocol analysis. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lichtenthaler, U. (2008). Integrated roadmaps for open innovation. Research Technology Management, 51(3), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lilien, G. L., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Linden, J. (2008). New city area discovered. Available online at http://blog.secondlife.com/2008/10/20/new-city-area-discovered/. 20 October. Accessed 28 October 2008.

  36. Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. (2005). User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34, 951–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. MacInnes, I. (2006). Property rights, legal issues, and business models in virtual world communities. Electronic Commerce Research, 6, 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46(12), 1513–1527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & Midgley, D. F. (2004). The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Research Policy, 33, 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Murray, C. D., Fox, J., & Pettifer, S. (2005). Absorption, dissociation, locus of control and presence in virtual reality. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1347–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: a structural modeling approach. Marketing Science, 19(1), 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web.20, http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html. O’Reilly Network, Retrieved on 2/07/2007.

  44. Papadopoulou, P., Andreou, A., Kanellis, P., & Martakos, D. (2001). Trust and relationship building in electronic commerce. Internet Research, 11(4), 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Papagiannidis, S., Bourlakis, M., & Li, F. (2008). Making Real Money in Virtual Worlds: MMORPGs and emerging business opportunities, challenges and ethical implications in metaverses. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 610–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Patel, H., & Cardinali, R. (1994). Virtual reality technology in business. Management Decision, 32(7), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Patton, M. A., & Josang, A. (2004). Technologies for trust in electronic commerce. Electronic Commerce Research, 4, 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Petrecca, L. (2006). There’s new place to set up shop: Virtual reality; Marketers move in to 3-D world called Second Life. USA Today—Money, 7, B4.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Preece, J. (2005). Online communities: design, theory, and practice. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4).

  50. Prentice, S. (2007). The five laws of virtual worlds. Gartner Research Publication, July 13, ID No. G00148019.

  51. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sager, J. L. (2002). Desktop virtual reality and electronic commerce: an empirical study of the impact of realism and perspective on usage intentions. Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, University of Colorado.

  53. Salomon, M. (2007). Business in Second Life: an introduction. Smart Internet Technology CRC, Swinburne University of Technology (pp. 1–26).

  54. Schloerb, D. W. (1995). A quantitative measure of telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(1), 64–80.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Schreier, M., Oberhauser, S., & Prugl, R. (2006). Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: insight from two extreme sports communities. Market Lett, 18, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Second Life (2007). Website www.secondlife.com.

  59. Sharma, S. K., Gupta, J. N. D., & Wickramasinge, N. (2006). A framework for designing the enterprise-wide e-commerce portal for evolving organizations. Electronic Commerce Research, 6, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sheridan, T. B. (1992). Musing on Telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 120–126.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Shih, C. F. (1998). Conceptualising consumer experiences in cyberspace. European Journal of Marketing, 32(7/8), 655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Siklos, R. (2006). A virtual world but real money. The New York Times, 19, C1.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Turban, E., & King, D. (2003). Introduction to e-commerce. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Urban, G. L., & von Hippel, E. (1988). Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science, 34(5), 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  68. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. Available online at http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www.

  69. von Hippel, E., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Breakthroughs to order at 3M via lead user innovation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)-Sloan School of Management (SSM) Working Paper # 4057. January. Available online at http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/2743/SWP-4057-42747841.pdf?sequence=1.

  70. von Hippel, E., & von Krogh, G. (2003). Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: issues for organization science. Organization Science, 14(2), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. von Hippel, E., Thomke, S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, September–October, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Welch, S. J. (2007). Get a [Second] Life. Successful Meetings, 56(3), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Zhang, S. X., Olfman, L., & Ractham, P. (2007). Designing ePortfolio 2.0: Integrating and coordinating Web 2.0 services with ePortfolio systems for enhancing users’ learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 18(2), 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Accountancy, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Kim Mackenzie, Sherrena Buckby & Helen Irvine

Authors
  1. Kim Mackenzie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sherrena Buckby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Helen Irvine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Mackenzie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mackenzie, K., Buckby, S. & Irvine, H. A framework for evaluating business lead users’ virtual reality innovations in Second Life. Electron Commer Res 9, 183–202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-009-9035-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-009-9035-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation