Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electronic community factories: the model and its application in the tourism sector

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electronic community factory (ECF) is proposed as an archetype for value creating cross-organization virtual communities of practice in which members engage actively and through domain-specific tools in the practice the community is about. In an ECF the reason for building the community is to appropriate the benefits of virtual networking for developing new products of added-value and collective ownership. In terms of engineering an ECF, the normative perspective adopted is that community management is distinctively different from engaging in the practice the community is about. Respectively, the tools needed for each function should embody this philosophy and be designed accordingly. The paper elaborates on the concept of the ECF and demonstrates its value through a pilot in regional tourism. Virtual ethnographic studies provide insights to operational aspects of the ECF and how it fosters community and practice management. Collectively, the results reported in the paper constitute an alternative model for community-based electronic commerce suitable for value-creating cross organization virtual communities of practice engaging in high quality product assembly in information based industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerman, M. S. (1998). Augmenting organizational memory—a field study of answer garden. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(3), 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akoumianakis, D. (2009). Managing accessibility requirements in software-intensive projects. Software Process: Improvement & Practice. doi:10.1002/spip.383.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Akoumianakis, D. (2008). Distributed knowledge management in virtual organizations: the ‘social’ experience factory. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akoumianakis, D., Vellis, G., Milolidakis, I., Kotsalis, D., & Alexandraki, C. (2008). Distributed collective practices in collaborative music performance. In Proceedings of 3rd ACM international conference on digital interactive media in entertainment and arts (DIMEA 2008) (pp. 368–375). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Akoumianakis, D., Vidakis, N., Vellis, G., Milolidakis, G., & Kotsalis, D. (2008). Interaction scenarios in the ‘social’ experience factory: assembling collaborative artefacts through component reuse and social interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd IASTED international conference on human computer interaction, Innsbruck, Austria.

  6. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge sharing teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnes, B. (2001). Practices as collective action. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 17–28). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Basili, V. R. (1993). The Experience Factory and its relationship to other improvement paradigms. In LNCS : Vol. 717. 4th European software engineering conference (ESEC) (pp. 68–83). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Basili, V. R., Lindvall, M., & Costa, P. (2001). Implementing the experience factory concepts as a set of experience bases. In International conference on software engineering and knowledge engineering (SEKE ’01). Available from http://www.cs.umd.edu/~basili/publications/proceedings/P90.pdf.

  10. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Knowledge and Communities, 2(1), 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buchel, B., & Raub, S. (2002). Building knowledge-creating value networks. European Management Journal, 20(6), 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buckingham Shum, S. (1996). Design argumentation as design rationale. In The encyclopaedia of computer science and technology (Vol. 35, pp. 95–128). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bughin, J., & Hagel, J. I. (2000). The operational performance of virtual communities—towards a successful business model? Electronic Markets, 10(4), 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cardoso, J., & Lange, C. (2007). A framework for assessing strategies and technologies for dynamic packaging applications in e-tourism. Information Technology & Tourism, 9, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, H., Titkova, O., Orwig, R., & Nunmaker, J. F. (1998). Information visualization for collaborative computing. IEEE Computer, 31, 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cusumano, M. A. (1989). The software factory: a historical interpretation. IEEE Software, March.

  18. de Souza, C., & Preece, J. (2004). A framework for analyzing and understanding on-line communities. Interacting with Computers, 16, 579–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dewhurst, F. W., & Cegarra Navarro, J. G. (2004). External communities of practice and relational capital. The Learning Organization: The International Journal of Knowledge and Organizational Learning Management, 11(4/5), 322–331.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dignum, V., & van Eeden, P. (2005). Seducing, engaging and supporting communities at Achmea. In W. Baets (Ed.), Knowledge management and management learning: extending the horizons of knowledge-based management (pp. 125–141). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Donath, J. (2002). Supporting community and building social capital: a semantic approach to visualizing online conversations. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 45–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duguid, P. (2005). The art of knowing—social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Enkel, E., Heinold, P., Hofel-Alfeis, J., & Wicki, Y. (2000). The power of communities. How to build knowledge management on a corporate level using the bottom up approach. In M. Ackerman, T. Davenport, & G. Probst (Eds.), Knowledge management case book (pp. 84–103). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W. (2001). Knowledge communities—online environments for supporting knowledge management and its social context. In M. Ackerman, P. Volkmar, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Beyond knowledge management: sharing expertise. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Erickson, T., Smith, D. N., Kellogg, W. A., Laff, M. R., Richards, J. T., & Bradner, E. (1999). Socially translucent systems: social proxies, persistent conversation, and the design of Babble. In Proceedings of ACM CHI’99 (pp. 72–79).

  27. Fernström, C., Närfelt, K.-H., & Ohlsson, L. (1992). Software factory principles, architecture, and experiments. IEEE Software, 9(2), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Franke, N., & Piller, F. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: the case of the watch market. The Journal of Product innovation management, 21, 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fuller, J., Bartl, M., Ernst, H., & Muhlbacher, H. (2006). Community based innovation: How to integrate members of virtual communities into new product development. Electronic Commerce Research, 6, 57–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Greenfield, J., & Short, K. (2004). Software factories: assembling applications with patterns, frameworks, models & tools. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hasan, H., & Gould, E. (2001). Support for the sense-making activity of managers. Decision Support Systems, 31, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hevner, A., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science research in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Houdek, F., Schneider, K., & Wieser, E. (1998). Establishing experience factories at Daimler-Benz: an experience report. In Proceedings of 20th international conference on software engineering (pp. 443–447), Kyoto, Japan.

  34. Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 23–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: an activity-based approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Juriado, R., & Gustafsson, N. (2007). Emergent communities of practice in temporary inter-organisational partnerships. The Learning Organization: The International Journal of Knowledge and Organizational Learning Management, 14(1), 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lave, J., & Wegner, E. (1991). Situated learning—legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leal, W. L. M., & Baêta, A. M. C. (2006). The contribution of communities of practice in an innovative enterprise. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 1(4), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  40. March, T. S., & Storey, C. V. (2008). Design science in the information systems discipline: an introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 725–730.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Markham, A. N. (2004). The politics, ethics, and methods of representation in online ethnography. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd edn.) (pp. 793–820).

  42. McWilliam, G. (2000). Building stronger brands through online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mitchell, J., & Young, S. (2002). Communities of practice and the national training framework. Melbourne: Australian National Training Authority (ANTA), Retrieved 18 February 2010 from http://www.reframingthefuture.net/docs/2003/Publications/4CP_broch.pdf.

  44. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., Isaacs, E., Creech, M., Johnson, J., & Hainsworth, J. (2002). Integrating communication and information through ContactMap. Communications of ACM, 45(4), 89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Olson, G., & Olson, J. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(2–3).

  46. Orlikowski, J. W. (2002). Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rittel, H. W. J. (1984). Second generation design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 317–327). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Scacchi, W. (2005). Socio-technical interaction networks in free/open source software development processes. In S. T. Acuna & N. Juristo (Eds.), Software process modelling (pp. 1–27).

  50. Scacchi, W., Feller, J., Fitzgerald, B., Hissam, S., & Lakhani, K. (2006). Understanding free/open source software development processes. Software Process—Improvement and Practice, 11(2), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schmidt, K., Wagner, I., & Tolar, M. (2007). Permutations of cooperative work practices: a study of two oncology clinics. In T. Gross et al. (Eds.), GROUP 2007: proceedings of the international conference on supporting group work (pp. 1–10). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Schultz, F., & Pucher, H. F. (2003). www.deck—Wissensmanagement bei Volkswagen. Industrie Management, 19(3), 64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Seaman, B. C., Mendonca, G. M., Basili, R. V., & Kim, Y.-M. (2003). User interface evaluation and empirically-based evolution of a prototype experience management tool. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 29(9), 838–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Stockdale, R., & Borovicka, M. (2006). Developing an online business community: a travel industry case study. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 134–143). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Tuckman, B. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Turner, W., Bowker, G., Gasser, L., & Zacklad, M. (2006). Information infrastructures for distributed collective practices. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15(2–3), 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R., Cho, H.-K., Li, & Wang, Y. (2002). Social decision support systems. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wagner, C. (1995). Decision support for messy problems. Information and Management, 28, 393–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. In Harvard business review (pp. 139–145).

  62. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Information Technology & Multimedia, Faculty of Applied Technologies, Technological Education Institution of Crete, Estavromenos, 71500, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Demosthenes Akoumianakis

Authors
  1. Demosthenes Akoumianakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Demosthenes Akoumianakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akoumianakis, D. Electronic community factories: the model and its application in the tourism sector. Electron Commer Res 10, 43–81 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9045-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9045-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation