Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Inter-organizational innovation and cloud computing

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firms are increasingly shifting from the ‘closed’ innovation paradigm, in which their innovation design and implementation activities were based on their own internal knowledge resources, skills and production facilities, towards the inter-organizational ‘open’ innovation paradigm, which is based to a significant degree on collaboration with other organizations, aiming at the exploitation of external knowledge resources, skills and production facilities as well. This paper investigates empirically the effects of firm’s inter-organizational collaboration for the design and implementation of innovations, and also use of ICT for supporting this collaboration, on firm’s propensity to adopt cloud computing (CC), and in this way it examines in an ‘objective’ manner to what extent firms regard CC as a cost-effective means of supporting inter-organizational collaboration for the design and implementation of innovation. Our study is based on a dataset collected in the e-Business Survey of the European Commission from 676 European firms from the glass, ceramics and cement manufacturing sectors. It has been concluded that firms of these sectors regard CC as a cost-effective means of supporting collaboration with other firms for the design of innovations in their products, services and processes, and also of reducing the costs and increasing the capabilities and flexibility of already existing electronic support of inter-organizational innovation design collaboration. Furthermore, our results indicate that firms find CC useful for the reduction of the costs and the increase of the capabilities and flexibility of their existing electronic support of the complex operations required for the inter-organizational implementation of innovations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackermann, T., Widjaja, T., Benlian, A., & Buxmann, P. (2012). Perceived IT security risks of cloud computing: Conceptualization and scale development. Proceedings of 33rd international conference on information systems (ICIS), St. Louis, USA.

  2. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., et al. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arvanitis, S., & Loukis, E. (2013). Outsourcing and firm performance—a comparative study of Swiss and Greek firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(3), 771–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, J. (2011). The technology–organization–environment framework. In Y. Dwivedi, M. Wade, & S. Schneberger (Eds.), Information systems theory: Explaining and predicting our digital society (pp. 231–246). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baraldi, E., & Nadin, G. (2006). The challenges in digitalising business relationships—The construction of an IT infrastructure for a textile-related business network. Technovation, 26, 1111–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellantuono, N., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2013). Different practices for open innovation: A context-based approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 558–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2011). Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives. Decision Support Systems, 52(1), 232–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berman, S., Kesterson-Townes, L., Marshall, A., & Srivathsa, R. (2012). The power of cloud—Driving business model innovation. New York, USA: IBM Institute for Business Value.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Busquets, J. (2010). Orchestrating smart business network dynamics for innovation. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(4), 481–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chesbrough, H. (2003). The Era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply chain management (6th ed.). USA: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clohessy, T., & Acton, T. (2013). Open innovation as a route to value in cloud computing. Proceedings of the 26th bled econference ‘einnovations: challenges and impacts for individuals, organizations and society’, June 9–June 13, 2013.

  15. Cui, T., Tong, Y., & Teo, H. H. (2012). Can information technology bridge knowledge distance in organizational open innovation? An absorptive capacity perspective. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2012), Orlando, USA.

  16. Cui, T., Ye, H. J., Teo, H. H., & Li, J. (2015). Information technology and open innovation: A strategic alignment perspective. Information & Management, 52(3), 348–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  18. Demirkan, H., & Goul, M. (2013). Taking value-networks to the cloud services: Security services, semantics and service level agreements. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 11(1), 51–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Demirkan, H., Cheng, H. K., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2010). Coordination strategies in an SaaS supply chain. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dodgson, M., Gann, D., & Salter, A. (2006). The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble. R&D Management, 36(3), 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Empirica GmbH. (2009). ICT and e-business impact in the glass, ceramics & cement industry. Brussels: European Commission, DG Enterprise & Industry, Bohn.

  22. Felin, T., & Zenger, T. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43, 914–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Forbes. (2013). Collaborating in the cloud. Available at: http://webobjects.cdw.com/webobjects/media/pdf/Solutions/Cloud-Collaboration/White-Paper-Collaborating-in-the-Clouds.pdf.

  24. Gangwar, H., Date, H., & Ramaswamy, R. (2015). Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hakansson, H., & Snehota, I. (Eds.). (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huizingh, E. (2011). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31, 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huston, L., & Sakkab, N. (2006). Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hsu, P., Ray, F., & Li-Hsieh, S. (2014). Examining cloud computing adoption intention, pricing mechanism and deployment model. International Journal of Information Management, 34, 474–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greene, W. H. (2011). Econometric analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gusmano, L., Mancusi, M. L., & Morrison, A. (2009). Globalization of production and innovation: How outsourcing is reshaping an advanced manufacturing area. Regional Studies, 44(3), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gutierrez, A., Boukrami, E., & Lumsden, R. (2015). Technological, organisational and environmental factors influencing managers’ decision to adopt cloud computing in the UK. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(6), 788–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jede, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2015). Integrating cloud computing in supply chain processes. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(6), 872–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., Sakata, I., & Matsushima, K. (2010). Multiscale analysis of interfirm networks in regional clusters. Technovation, 30, 168–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kyriakou, N., & Loukis, E. (2015). Firm Characteristics and Propensity for Cloud Computing Adoption, Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Puerto Rico, August 2015, Puerto Rico

  35. Lai, I., Tam, S., & Chan, M. (2012). Knowledge cloud system for network collaboration: A case study in medical service industry in China. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(15), 12205–12212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2014). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (13th ed.). UK: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Leavitt, H. J. (1964). Applied organization change in industry: Structural, technical, and human approaches. In S. Cooper, H. J. Leavitt, & K. Shelly (Eds.), New perspectives in organizational research (pp. 55–71). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2010). Analyzing ICT adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: An empirical investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 30(6), 521–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Loukis, E., & Kyriakou, N. (2015). Organizational factors affecting propensity to adopt cloud computing. HICSS 2015, 5–8 January 2015, Kauai Island, HI.

  41. Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(7), 1006–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland, R. J., Jr. (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26, 47–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Majava, J., Isoherranen, V., & Kess, P. (2013). Business collaboration concepts and implications for companies. International Journal of Synergy and Research, 2(1), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mangula, I. S., Weerd, I.,& Brinkkemper, S. (2014). The adoption of software-as-service: An Indonesian case study. Proceedings in Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS), 2014.

  45. Mancinelli, S., & Mazzanti, M. (2009). Innovation, networking and complementarity. Evidence on SME performances for a local economic system in North-Eastern Italy. Annals of Regional Science, 43(3), 567–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Marston, S., Li, Z., Brandyopadyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing—The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2010). The NIST definition of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Meroño-Cerdan, A., Soto-Acosta, P., & Lopez-Nicolas, C. (2008). How do collaborative technologies affect innovation in SMEs? International Journal of e-Collaboration, 4(4), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mina, A., Bascavusoglu-Moreau, E., & Hughes, A. (2014). Open service innovation and the firm’s search for external knowledge. Research Policy, 43, 853–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Müller, S. D., Holm, S. R., & Søndergaard, J. (2015). Benefits of cloud computing: Literature review in a maturity model perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 851–878.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Navghavi, A., & Ottaviano, I. P. (2010). Outsourcing, complementary innovations, and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1009–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & Management, 51, 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Oracle White Paper. (2011). Cloud computing maturity model guiding success with cloud capabilities. Retrieved from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/entarch/oracle-wp-cloud-maturity-model-r3-0-1434934.pdf.

  54. Pisano, G. P., & Verganti, R. (2008). Which kind of collaboration is right for you? Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 78–86.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rainer, R. K., Prince, B., & Watson, H. J. (2015). Management Information Systems (3rd ed.). USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ross, P., & Blumenstein, M. (2015). Cloud computing as a facilitator of SME entrepreneurship. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(1), 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rycroft, R. W. (2007). Does cooperation absorb complexity? Innovation networks and the speed and spread of complex technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 565–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Salavisa, I., Sousa, C., & Fontes, M. (2012). Topologies of innovation networks in knowledge-intensive sectors: Sectoral differences in the access to knowledge and complementary assets through formal and informal ties. Technovation, 32, 380–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Siepermann, M., Sutaj. A., Lübbecke, P., & Lackes, R. (2016). Refuse to walk on clouds—Why firms still do not use cloud computing. An empirical study of barriers and enhancers. Proceedings of the 49th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS-49), Kauai, HI.

  60. Soto-Acosta, P., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Popa, S. (2014). Web knowledge sharing and its effect on innovation: An empirical investigation in SMEs. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(1), 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sreejesh, S., Mohapatra, S., & Anusree, M. R. (2014). Business research methods—An applied orientation. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sultan, N. (2013). Knowledge management in the age of cloud computing and Web 2.0: Experiencing the power of disruptive innovations. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 160–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Tan, X., & Kim, Y. (2015). User acceptance of SaaS-based collaboration tools: A case of Google Docs. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 423–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Venders, W., & Whitley, E. (2012). A critical review of cloud computing: Researching desires and reality. Journal of Information Technology, 27, 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Willcocks, L., Venters, W., & Whitley, E. A. (2013). Cloud sourcing and innovation: Slow train coming? Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal, 6(2), 184–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Willcocks, L., Venters, W., & Whitley, E. A. (2014). Moving to the cloud corporation. UK: Palgrave Millan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transaction cost economics. In R. Schmalensee & R. D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. 1, pp. 135–182). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  71. West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbekec, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43, 805–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wu, I. L., & Chang, C. H. (2012). Using the balanced scorecard in assessing the performance of e-SCM diffusion: A multi-stage perspective. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 474–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Xie, X. M., Zeng, S. X., & Tam, C. M. (2013). How does cooperative innovation affect innovation performance? Evidence from Chinese firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(8), 939–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M., & Tam, C. M. (2010). Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SME. Technovation, 30, 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhang, Q., Cheng, L., & Boutaba, R. (2010). Cloud computing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 1(1), 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Communication Systems Engineering, University of the Aegean, 83200, Samos, Greece

    E. Loukis, N. Kyriakou & K. Pazalos

  2. Department of Business Management and Finance, Universidad de Murcia, 30100, Murcia, Spain

    S. Popa

Authors
  1. E. Loukis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. N. Kyriakou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Pazalos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Popa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Loukis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loukis, E., Kyriakou, N., Pazalos, K. et al. Inter-organizational innovation and cloud computing. Electron Commer Res 17, 379–401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9239-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9239-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation