Skip to main content
Log in

Characteristics and challenges in the industries towards responsible AI: a systematic literature review

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Ethics and Information Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today humanity is in the midst of the massive expansion of new and fundamental technology, represented by advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The ongoing revolution of these technologies and their profound impact across various sectors, has triggered discussions about the characteristics and values that should guide their use and development in a responsible manner. In this paper, we conduct a systematic literature review with the aim of pointing out existing challenges and required principles in AI-based systems in different industries. We discuss our findings and provide general recommendations to be considered during AI deployment in production. The results have shown many gaps and concerns towards responsible AI and integration of complex AI models in the industry that the research community could address.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.scopus.com/.

  2. https://link.springer.com/.

  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by MA, OK, CK, CK, KM, EM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MA, OK, CK, CK, KM, EM and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Ioannis Konstantinidis devised the project, the main conceptual ideas, supervised the findings of this work and contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript. EK, CB, IM and VP contributed to the writing of the manuscript and on addressing the revisions required in the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and provided critical feedback to shape the research, analysis and manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Konstantinidis.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

ID

Authors

ID

Authos

1

(Aitken et al., 2020)

36

(Kang et al., 2021)

2

(Ashrafian, 2014a)

37

(Kleindienst et al., 2017)

3

(Ashrafian, 2014b)

38

(Kuleshov et al., 2020)

4

(Balmer et al., 2020)

39

(Loftus et al., 2020)

5

(Banks, 2018)

40

(Lugano, 2017)

6

(Bartoletti, 2019)

41

(Luo, 2019)

7

(Bauer et al., 2017)

42

(Marri et al., 2019)

8

(Bendel, 2017)

43

(Martin, 2016)

9

(Bjørgen et al., 2018)

44

(Mason, 1986)

10

(Bogosian, 2017)

45

(Maxmen, 2018)

11

(Braun & Garriga, 2018)

46

(McAleenan, 2020)

12

(Breidbach & Maglio, 2020)

47

(McBride, 2016)

13

(Campbell et al., 2020)

48

(Mendling et al., 2018)

14

(Caner & Bhatti, 2020)

49

(Mittelstadt et al., 2016)

15

(Carter, 2019)

50

(Montes & Goertzel, 2019)

16

(Cath et al., 2017)

51

(Munoko et al., 2020)

17

(Cervantes et al., 2015)

52

(Pagallo, 2012)

18

(Chakraborty et al., 2020)

53

(Pedersen & Johansen, 2019)

19

(Cheng et al., 2020)

54

(Pitman et al., 2019)

20

(Cysneiros & do Prado Leite, 2020)

55

(Rahwan, 2017)

21

(Dahiyat, 2010)

56

(Rességuier & Rodrigues, 2020)

22

(David et al., 2019)

57

(Riedl & Zook, 2013)

23

(De Las Morenas et al., 2020)

58

(Roberts et al., 2020)

24

(Dignum, 2019)

59

(Russell & Norvig, 2002)

25

(Dodig Crnkovic & Çürüklü, 2011)

60

(Ten Teije et al., 2017)

26

(Erdélyi & Erdélyi, 2020)

61

(Timmers, 2019)

27

(Etzioni & Etzioni, 2017)

62

(Tonkens, 2009)

28

(Faulhaber et al., 2018)

63

(Turner, 2018)

29

(Ghandour & Woodford, 2019)

64

(Vaio et al., 2020)

30

(Gill, 2019)

65

(Vakkuri et al., 2020)

31

(Graham et al., 2019)

66

(Vakkuri et al., 2019b)

32

(Hauer, 2019)

67

(Vervoort et al., 2020)

33

(Hoeschl et al., 2018)

68

(Winfield et al., 2019)

34

(Howard & Borenstein, 2017)

69

(Yang et al., 2019)

35

(Juho, 2019)

  

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anagnostou, M., Karvounidou, O., Katritzidaki, C. et al. Characteristics and challenges in the industries towards responsible AI: a systematic literature review. Ethics Inf Technol 24, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09634-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09634-1

Keywords

Navigation