Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A novel approach to relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD based on probabilistic linguistic preferences

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) is a customer-oriented product/service design tool with diversified team members reaching a consensus in developing a new or an improved product/service to maximize customer satisfaction. Determining the relative importance ratings (RIRs) of customer requirements (CRs) is actually a multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problem, which is regarded as an essential step in QFD application. Although many decision making approaches have been developed to rate the CRs, few of them refer to derive the weights of evaluators, and there is paucity of literature which combines the probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) with QFD methodology. Therefore, PLTSs are introduced in our study, to simultaneously reflect the hesitancy and preference degrees of evaluators. A novel MADM technique based on probabilistic linguistic preference (PLP) is explored to calculate the RIRs among CRs under the PLP environment. Concretely, some operators, such as the normalization formulas, the probabilistic linguistic expected value (PLEV) operator as well as the standard formula, are applied to weight the decision makers; a modified grey relational analysis-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (GRA-TOPSIS) method called probabilistic linguistic-based GRA-TOPSIS is also proposed to rate the relative importance over CRs. Finally, application of product improvement of a turbine engine is given to see the validity and feasibility of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bodily, S. E. (1979). A delegation process for combining individual utility functions. Management Science, 25(10), 1035–1041.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, H., & Song, B. F. (2009). Study on effectiveness evaluation of weapon systems based on grey relational analysis and TOPSIS. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 20(1), 106–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Martínez, L. (2000). A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, W., He, T., Lee, C. K. M., & Emrouznejad, A. (2012). Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10841–10850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. N., & Zhao, H. R. (2016). Performance evaluation of eco-industrial thermal power plants by using fuzzy GRA-VIKOR and combination weighting techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. L., Du, Y. F., & Chin, K. S. (2018). Determining the importance ratings of customer requirements in quality function deployment based on interval linguistic information. International Journal of Production Research, 56(14), 4692–4708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H. C., Mi, X. M., & Xu, Z. S. (2019). A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: Bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 19, 81–134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nepal, B., Yadav, O. P., & Murat, A. (2010). A fuzzy-AHP approach to prioritization of CS attributes in target planning for automotive product development. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), 6775–6786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. S. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Sciences, 369, 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parameshwaran, R., Baskar, C., & Karthik, T. (2015). An integrated framework for mechatronics based product development in a fuzzy environment. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 376–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J. G., Xia, G., Sun, B. Q., & Wang, S. J. (2018). Systematical decision-making approach for quality function deployment based on uncertain linguistic term sets. International Journal of Production Research, 56(18), 6183–6200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2013). A group decision making model dealing with comparative linguistic expressions based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Information Sciences, 241, 28–42.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tsaur, R. C. (2015). Green product pricing decision analysis with application to personal computers. International Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 307–320.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. Q., Fung, R. Y. K., Li, Y. L., & Pu, Y. (2016). A group multi-granularity linguistic-based methodology for prioritizing engineering characteristics under uncertainties. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S. M., Liu, H. C., & Wang, L. E. (2017). Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: A case study in electric vehicle. International Journal of Production Research, 55(15), 4436–4449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X. L., & Liao, H. C. (2018). An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Information Fusion, 43, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, W. Y., Xu, Z. S., Ren, Z. L., & Wang, H. (2018). Probabilistic linguistic analytic hierarchy process and its application on the performance assessment of Xiongan new area. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17(6), 1693–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. S. (2004). A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Information Sciences, 166(1–4), 19–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. S. (2006). A note on linguistic hybrid arithmetic averaging operator in multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(6), 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. S. (2009). An interactive approach to multiple attribute group decision making with multigranular uncertain linguistic information. Group Decision and Negotiation, 18(2), 119–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W. G., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). A novel TOPSIS method based on improved grey relational analysis for multiattribute decision-making problem. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaim, S., Sevkli, M., Camgöz-Akdaǧ, H., Demirel, O. F., & Yayla, A. Y. (2014). Use of ANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(9), 4464–4474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. L. (2018). A novel probabilistic linguistic approach for large-scale group decision making with incomplete weight information. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(7), 2245–2256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Xu, Z. S., Wang, H., & Liu, S. S. (2017). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making based on the minimum deviation method. Soft Computing, 21(12), 3439–3459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, B., & Xu, Z. S. (2014). Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transaction Fuzzy Systems, 22(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61876157, 71571148), and the Yanghua Scholar Plan (Part A) of SWJTU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Yinfeng Du & Dun Liu

Authors
  1. Yinfeng Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dun Liu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, Y., Liu, D. A novel approach to relative importance ratings of customer requirements in QFD based on probabilistic linguistic preferences. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 20, 365–395 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09347-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-020-09347-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation