Skip to main content
Log in

A generic data model for moving objects

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Moving objects databases should be able to manage trips that pass through several real world environments, e.g., road network, indoor. However, the current data models only deal with the movement in one situation and cannot represent comprehensive trips for humans who can move inside a building, walk on the pavement, drive on the road, take the public vehicles (bus or train), etc. As a result, existing queries are solely limited to one environment. In this paper, we design a data model that is able to represent moving objects in multiple environments in order to support novel queries on trips in different surroundings and various transportation modes (e.g., Car, Walk, Bus). A generic and precise location representation is proposed that can apply in all environments. The idea is to let the space for moving objects be covered by a set of so-called infrastructures each of which corresponds to an environment and defines the available places for moving objects. Then, the location is represented by referencing to the infrastructure. We formulate the concept of space and infrastructure and propose the methodology to represent moving objects in different environments with the integration of precise transportation modes. Due to different infrastructure characteristics, a set of novel data types is defined to represent infrastructure components. To efficiently support new queries, we design a group of operators to access the data. We present how such a data model is implemented in a database system and report the experimental results. The new model is designed with attention to the data models of previous work for free space and road networks to have a consistent type system and framework of operators. In this way, a powerful set of generic query operations is available for querying, together with those dealing with infrastructures and transportation modes. We demonstrate these capabilities by formulating a set of sophisticated queries across all infrastructures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Indoor location is not precisely represented by existing models.

  2. Using the algebraic terminology that for a data type α, its domain or carrier set is denoted as D α .

  3. The value means the distance from the road surface after the building construction.

  4. MPPTN stands for moving point for public transportation network.

  5. Basic types such as int, bool are omitted.

  6. sometimes is a derived operation, sometimes(mb) = not(isempty(deftime(mb at true))). See [17], Exercise 4.5.

  7. for simplicity, we only show the transportation mode in each unit

References

  1. http://code.google.com/transit/spec/transit_feed_specification.html (2011). Accessed 15 Dec 2011

  2. http://conversations.nokia.com/2008/09/23/indoor-positioning-coming-to-life/ (2012). Accessed 18 June 2012

  3. http://dna.fernuni-hagen.de/secondo.html/transportationmode.html (2012). Accessed 18 June 2012

  4. http://www.bbbike.de/cgi-bin/bbbike.cgi (2008). Accessed 18 June 2012

  5. http://www.edenresort.com/home (2010). Accessed 20 Dec 2010

  6. http://www.greenhosp.org/floor_plans.asp (2011). Accessed 10 May 2011

  7. http://www.modulargenius.com/default.aspx (2010). Accessed 20 Jan 2010

  8. Bauer V, Gamper J, Loperfido R, Profanter S, Putzer S, Timko I (2008) Computing isochrones in multi-modal, schedule-based transport networks. In: ACM GIS, Demo

  9. Booth J, Sistla P, Wolfson O, Cruz IF (2009) A data model for trip planning in multimodal transportation systems. In: EDBT

  10. Brakatsoulas S, Pfoser D, Tryfona N (2004) Modeling, storing and mining moving object databases. In: IDEAS

  11. Chen L, Özsu MT, Oria V (2005) Robust and fast similarity search for moving object trajectories. In: SIGMOD

  12. Chen Z, Shen HT, Zhou X, Zheng Y, Xie X (2010) Searching trajectories by locations—an efficiency study. In: SIGMOD

  13. Ding Z, Güting RH (2004) Managing moving objects on dynamic transportation networks. In: SSDBM

  14. Forlizzi L, Güting RH, Nardelli E, Schneider M (2000) A data model and data structures for moving objects databases. In: SIGMOD, pp 319–330

  15. González MC, Hidalgo RCA, Barabási A (2008) Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453:779–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grumbach S, Rigaux P, Segoufin L (2000) Manipulating interpolated data is easier than you thought. In: VLDB

  17. Güting RH, Schneider M (2005) Moving objects databases. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo

    Google Scholar 

  18. Güting RH, Böhlen MH, Erwig M, Jensen CS, Lorentzos NA, Schneider M, Vazirgiannis M (2000) A foundation for representing and querying moving objects. ACM TDOS 25(1):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Güting RH, Almeida V, Ansorge D, Behr T, Ding Z, Höse T, Hoffmann F, Spiekermann M (2005) Secondo: an extensible dbms platform for research prototyping and teaching. In: ICDE, demo paper

  20. Güting RH, de Almeida VT, Ding ZM (2006) Modeling and querying moving objects in networks. VLDB J 15(2):165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Güting RH, Behr T, Xu J (2010) Efficient k-nearest neighbor search on moving object trajectories. VLDB J 19(5):687–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hage C, Jensen CS, Pedersen TB, Speicys L, Timko I (2003) Integrated data management for mobile services in the real world. In: VLDB

  23. Iwerks GS, Samet H, Smith K (2003) Continuous k-nearest neighbor queries for continuous moving points with updates. In: VLDB

  24. Jensen CS, Kligys A, Pedersen TB, Timko I (2004) Multidimensional data modeling for location-based services. VLDB J 13:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jensen CS, Lu H, Yang B (2009) Graph model based indoor tracking. In: MDM

  26. Jensen CS, Lu H, Yang B (2009) Indexing the trajectories of moving objects in symbolic indoor space. In: SSTD

  27. Jeung H, Liu Q, Shen HT, Zhou X (2008) A hybrid prediction model for moving objects. In: ICDE

  28. Jeung H, Yiu ML, Zhou X, Jensen CS, Shen HT (2008) Discovery of convoys in trajectory databases. In: VLDB

  29. Kuijpers B, Othman W (2007) Trajectory databases: data models, uncertainty and complete query languages. In: ICDT

  30. Lema JA, Forlizzi L, Güting RH, Schneider M (2003) Algorithms for moving objects databases. Comput J 46(6):680–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lorenz B, Ohlbach HJ, Stoffel EP (2006) A hybrid spatial model for representing indoor environments. In: W2GIS

  32. Mouratidis K, Hadjieleftheriou M, Papadias D (2005) Conceptual partitioning: an efficient method for continuous nearest neighbor monitoring. In: SIGMOD

  33. Mouratidis K, Yiu ML, Papadias D, Mamoulis N (2006) Continuous nearest neighbor monitoring in road networks. In: VLDB

  34. Mouratidis K, Lin Y, Yiu ML (2010) Preference queries in large multi-cost transportation networks. In: ICDE

  35. Mouza C, Rigaux P (2005) Mobility patterns. Geoinformatica 9(4):297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mouza C, Rigaux P, Scholl M (2005) Efficient evaluation of parameterized pattern queries. In: CIKM

  37. Praing R, Schneider M (2007) Modeling historical and future movements of spatio-temporal objects in moving objects databases. In: CIKM, pp 183–192

  38. Praing R, Schneider M (2007) A universal abstract model for future movements of moving objects. In: AGILE conf., pp 111–120

  39. Reddy S, Mun M, Burke J, Estrin D, Hansen MH, Srivastava MB (2010) Using mobile phones to determine transportation modes. TOSN 6(2):82–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Scarponcini P (2002) Generalized model for linear referencing in transportation. Geoinformatica 6(1):35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shekhar S, Coyle M, Goyal B, Liu DR, Sarkar S (1997) Data models in geographic information systems. Commun ACM 40 4:103–111

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sistla P, Wolfson O, Chamberlain S, Dao S (1997) Modeling and querying moving objects. In: ICDE, pp 422–432

  43. Speicys L, Jensen CS (2008) Enabling location-based services–multi-graph representation of transportation networks. GeoInformatica 12(2):219–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Speicys L, Jensen CS, Kligys A (2003) Computational data modeling for network-constrained moving objects. In: ACM-GIS

  45. Stenneth L, Wolfson O, Yu P, Xu B (2011) Transportation mode detection using mobile devices and gis information. In: ACM SIGSPATIAL

  46. Su J, Xu H, Ibarra OH (2001) Moving objects: logical relationships and queries. In: SSTD

  47. Tao Y, Papadias D, Shen Q (2002) Continuous nearest neighbor search. In: VLDB

  48. Thiagarajan A, Madden S (2008) Querying continuous functions in a database system. In: SIGMOD

  49. Timko I, Pedersen TB (2004) Capturing complex multidimensional data in location-based data warehouses. In: GIS, pp 147–156

  50. Vazirgiannis M, Wolfson O (2001) A spatiotemporal model and language for moving objects on road networks. In: SSTD

  51. Voisard A, David B (2002) A database perspective on geospatial data modeling. TKDE 14(2):226–242

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wolfson O, Xu B, Chamberlain S, Jiang L (1998) Moving objects databases: issues and solutions. In: SSDBM, pp 111–122

  53. Wolfson O, Chamberlain S, Kalpakis K, Yesha Y (2001) Modeling moving objects for location based services. In: IMWS

  54. Xu J, Güting RH (2011) Infrastructures for research on multimodal moving objects. In: MDM, demo paper

  55. Xu J, Güting RH (2012) GMOBench: a benchmark for generic moving objects. Informatik-Report 362, Fernuniversität in Hagen

  56. Xu J, Güting RH (2012) MWGen: a mini world generator. In: MDM, to appear

  57. Yang B, Lu H, Jensen CS (2010) Probabilistic threshold k nearest neighbor queries over moving objects in symbolic indoor space. In: EDBT

  58. Zhang J, Zhu M, Papadias D, Tao Y, Tee DL (2003) Location-based spatial queries. In: SIGMOD

  59. Zheng Y, Liu L, Wang L, Xie X (2008) Learning transportation mode from raw GPS data for geographic applications on the web. In: WWW

  60. Zheng Y, Chen Y, Xie X, Ma WY (2010) Understanding transportation mode based on GPS data for web application. ACM Trans Web 4(1):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianqiu Xu.

Appendices

Appendix A: Operator semantics

We extend the definition of operator geodata and give domains and ranges in Table 12. geodata which plays a crucial rule for defining semantics, maps locations in different infrastructures into free space. The first three signatures are for PTN. Given a line and the relative position on the line, geodata returns a point for that position. Given a point (line) inside a region, we obtain its global position. The last one maps an indoor location to free space. This is done by ignoring the height above the ground level, i.e., projecting a room to the ground floor of a building. To have the symbol set denoting data types supported by geodata, we define IOSymbol’ = {LINE, REGION, BUSROUTE, GROOM} (⊂ IOSymbol).

Table 12 Extension for geodata

Definition A.1

=: \({\underline{\textit{genloc}}} \times {\underline{\textit{genloc}}} \rightarrow {\underline{\textit{bool}}}\)

Let u,v be the two locations and the result is TRUE iff

  1. (i)

    \(u.oid = \bot \wedge v.oid =\bot \wedge u.i_{loc} = v.i_{loc}\); or

  2. (ii)

    u.oid = v.oid ∧ u.i loc  = v.i loc ; or

  3. (iii)

    \(u.oid=\bot \wedge (\exists w \in Space: w.oid = v.oid \wedge w.s\in\) IOSymbol’ ∧ \(u.i_{loc} = \textbf{geodata} (w.\beta,v.i_{loc}))\); or

  4. (iv)

    \(v.oid=\bot \wedge (\exists w \in Space: w.oid = u.oid \wedge w.s\in\) IOSymbol’ ∧ \(v.i_{loc} = \textbf{geodata}(w.\beta,u.i_{loc}))\)

Cases (i) and (ii) are straightforward as both locations are in free space or in the same IFOB. In case (iii) and (iv), if one location is in free space and the other belongs to another infrastructure, the latter maps to free space by loading the referenced IFOB.

Definition A.2

inside: \({\underline{\textit{genloc}}} \times {\underline{\textit{genrange}}} \rightarrow {\underline{\textit{bool}}}\)

Let u be a single location and V be a set of locations. The result is TRUE iff \(\exists v \in V\) such that

  1. (i)

    \(u.oid = \bot \wedge v.oid = \bot \wedge u.i_{loc} \in v.l\); or

  2. (ii)

    u.oid = v.oid ∧ (u.i loc  ∈ v.l ∨ \((\exists w \in Space: v.oid = w.oid \ \wedge\) \(\textbf{geodata}(w.\beta, u.i_{loc}) \in \textbf{geodata}( w.\beta,v.l)))\); or

  3. (iii)

    \(u.oid = \bot \wedge (\exists w \in Space:\) v.oid = w.oid ∧ w.s ∈ IOSymbol’ ∧ \(u.i_{loc} \in \textbf{geodata}(w.\beta,v.l))\); or

  4. (iv)

    \(v.oid = \bot \wedge (\exists w \in Space:\) u.oid = w.oid ∧ w.s ∈ IOSymbol ∧ \(\textbf{geodata} (w.\beta,u.i_{loc}) \in v.l)\)

Case (i) shows a single location and a set of locations in free space. If u,v reference to the same object w (case (ii)), one can directly compare the location inside w or load the referenced object to transform from relative location to global. Similarly, if one parameter corresponds to free space and the other does not, we need to perform location mapping by the referenced object. These are cases (iii) and (iv).

Definition A.3

intersects: \({\underline{\textit{genrange}}} \times {\underline{\textit{genrange}}} \rightarrow {\underline{\textit{bool}}}\)

The result is TRUE iff \(\exists u \in U, \exists v \in V\) such that

  1. (i)

    \(u.oid = \bot \wedge v.oid = \bot \wedge u.l ~ \textbf{intersects} ~ v.l\) ; or

  2. (ii)

    \(u.oid = v.oid \wedge u.l ~ \textbf{intersects} ~ v.l\) ; or

  3. (iii)

    \(u.oid = \bot \wedge (\exists w \in Space:\) v.oid = w.oid  ∧ w.s ∈ IOSymbol’ ∧ u.l intersects geodata (w.β, v.l)); or

  4. (iv)

    \(v.oid = \bot \wedge (\exists w \in Space:\) u.oid = w.oid ∧ w.s ∈ IOSymbol’ ∧ v.l intersects geodata(w.β, u.l))

Definition A.4

distance: \({\underline{\textit{genloc}}} \times {\underline{\textit{genloc}}} \rightarrow \underline{\textit{real}}\)

\(\textbf{length}(\textbf{trajectory}(\textbf{trip}(u, v)))\)

Definition A.5

trajectory: \({\underline{\textit{genmo}}} \rightarrow {\underline{\textit{genrange}}}\)

The result is a set of (oid, l, m) where m = u i .m and the values for oid and l are defined in the following.

  1. (i)

    \(u_i.oid = \bot ~\Rightarrow ~oid = \bot \wedge l= \cup f(t)(t\in u_i.i)\); or

  2. (ii)

    \(\exists w \in Space\): u.oid = w.oid  ∧  (w.s =  REGION ∨ w.s = GROOM), then oid = u.oid, l = ∪ f(t).i loc (t ∈ u i .i); or

  3. (iii)

    \(\exists w \in Space\): u.oid = w.oid  ∧  (w.s = LINE ∨ w.s = BUSROUTE), then \(oid = u.oid, l=\cup \textbf{geodata}(w.\beta,f(t).i_{loc})(t\in u_i.i)\); or

  4. (iv)

    \(\exists w_1, w_2 \in Space: u.oid w_1.oid \wedge w_1.s \mathrm{MPPTN} \wedge \textbf{ref\_id}(w_1)w_2.oid\), then \(oid = w_2.oid, l= \textbf{trajectory}(\textbf{atperiods}(w_1,u_i.i\)))

The trajectory of a moving object is a set of movement projections, each of which shows the path of a unit u i  ∈ mo. The meaning for (i) and (ii) should be clear. In case (iii), the object moves along a pre-defined path, e.g., a road or bus route. For case (iv), the location in u i maps to a bus. Then, the trajectory is the bus movement, which goes to case (iii).

Definition A.6

at: \({\underline{\textit{genmo}}} \times {\underline{\textit{genloc}}} \rightarrow {\underline{\textit{genmo}}}\)

Let mo = < u 1, u 2, ..., u n  > be the moving object and v denote the location.

  1. (i)

    \(v.i_{loc} \neq \bot\), the result is < u 1′,...,u k ′ > where u i ′ ∈ mo ∧ ∀ t ∈ u i ′.i: f(t) = v; or

  2. (ii)

    \(v.oid \neq \bot \wedge v.i_{loc}=\bot\), then the result is < u 1′,...,u k ′ > where u i ′ ∈ mo ∧

    1. (a)

      u i ′.oid = v.oid; or

    2. (b)

      \(u_i'.oid = \bot \wedge (\exists w \in Space\) such that w.oid = v.oid ∧ ∀ t ∈ u i ′.i: f(t) ∈ w.β ∧ w.s ∈   IOSymbol’)

The meaning is clear if the second argument represents a precise location (case (i)). If the location only records an object id (case (ii)), then the units in the result could have the same reference id as the input, or the unit location maps to the place covered by the given IFOB.

Definition A.7

intersection: \({\underline{\textit{genrange}}} \times {\underline{\textit{genrange}}} \rightarrow {\underline{\textit{genrange}}}\)

Let U and V be the two arguments, and the result is denoted by L. The value for L is defined in the following: ∀ \(l_i \in D_{\underline{\emph{genloc}}}\): l i inside L \(\Rightarrow\) l i inside Ul i inside V.

Definition A.8

at: \({\underline{\textit{genmo}}} \times {\underline{\textit{genrange}}} \rightarrow {\underline{\textit{genmo}}}\)

Let mo = < u 1, u 2, ..., u n  > be the moving object and V be a set of locations. We use L (\(\in D_{{\underline{\textit{genrange}}}}\)) to denote the intersection locations between trajectory(mo) and V. The result is mo′ = < u 1′, u 2′, ... , u k ′ > fulfilling the condition: ∀ u j ′ ∈ mo′, \(\forall t \in u_j'.i: f(t) (\in D_{\underline{\emph{genloc}}})\) inside L.

Appendix B: Example relations and query signatures

The following relations are used in the queries throughout the paper. Infrastructure relations are accessed by the get_infra operator.

$$ \texttt{MOGendon(Mo\_id: int, Traj: genmo, Name: string)} $$
rel_busstop :

(BusStopId: int, Stop: busstop, Name: string)

rel_busroute :

(BusRouteId: int, Route; busroute, Name: string, Up: bool)

rel_bus :

(BusId: int, BusTrip: mpptn, Name: string)

rel_room :

(RoomId: int, Room: groom, Name: string)

rel_door :

(DoorId: int, Door: door)

rel_roompath :

(RoomPathId: int, Door1: int, Door2: int, Weight: real, Room: groom, Name: string, Path: line)

rel_rbo :

(RegId: int, Reg: region, Name: string)

rel_rn :

(RoadId: int, Road: line, Name: string)

In the following tables we show the signatures of operations used in the queries. Operator get_infra is omitted as it occurs in almost every query. We define subtype to mean that the operator performs a conversion from a specific type to a generic type.

No.

Operator

Signature

 

Definition

Q1

    

Q2

geodata

busroute × busstop

point

Section 4.1.2

Q3

atinstant

genmo × instant

intime(genloc)

Table 6

val

intime(genloc)

genloc

Table 6

Q4

atperiods

genmo × periods

genmo

Table 6

val

intime(genloc)

genloc

Table 6

=

genloc × genloc

bool

Table 7

Q5

get_mode

genmo

set(tm)

Table 9

contains

set(tm) × tm

bool

Section 6.3

Q6

at

genmo × tm

genmo

Table 9

deftime

genmo

periods

Table 6

duration

periods

real

Table 6

Q7

ref_id

mpptn

int

Table 9

at

genmo × tm

genmo

Table 9

get_ref

genmo

set(ioref )

Table 9

contains

set(ioref ) × int

bool

Section 6.3

Q8

subtype

busstop

< genloc

Table 10

at

genmo × tm

genmo

Table 9

at

genmo × genloc

genmo

Table 8

deftime

genmo

periods

Table 6

duration

periods

real

Table 6

Q9

contains

set(region) × region

bool

Section 6.3

freespace

groom

region

Table 11

contains

set(string) × string

bool

Section 6.3

Q10

freespace

mpptn

mpoint

Table 11

passes

mpoint × region

bool

[18]

Q11

ref_id

mpptn

int

Table 9

distance

mpoint × mpoint

mreal

[18]

freespace

mpptn

mpoint

Table 11

freespace

genmo

mpoint

Table 11

at

genmo × tm

genmo

Table 9

Q12

subtype

busroute

< genrange

Table 10

subtype

line

< genrange

Table 10

intersects

genrange × genrange

bool

Table 7

Q13

atperiods

genmo × periods

genmo

Table 6

at

genmo × tm

genmo

Table 9

get_ref

genmo

set(ioref )

Table 9

contains

set(ioref ) × int

bool

Section 6.3

Q14

at

genmo × tm

genmo

Table 9

trajectory

genmo

genrange

Table 8

Q15

subtype

groom

< genrange

Table 10

at

genmo × genrange

genmo

Table 8

deftime

genmo

periods

Table 6

components

periods

set(periods)

Section 6.3

duration

periods

real

Table 6

Q16

ref_id

mpptn

int

Table 9

subtype

busstop

< genloc

Table 10

genloc

int × real × real

genloc

Table 11

at

genmo × genloc

genmo

Table 8

initial

genmo

intime(genloc)

Table 6

val

intime(genloc)

genloc

Table 6

=

genloc × genloc

bool

Table 7

Q17

subtype

groom

< genrange

Table 10

passes

genmo × genrange

bool

Table 8

subtype

busstop

< genloc

Table 10

atperiods

genmo × periods

genmo

Table 6

at

genmo × tm

genmo

Table 9

initial

genmo

intime(genloc)

Table 6

final

genmo

intime(genloc)

Table 6

val

intime(genloc)

genloc

Table 6

=

genloc × genloc

bool

Table 7

Q18

subtype

gline

< genrange

Table 10

atperiods

genmo × periods

genmo

Table 8

components

periods

set(periods)

Section 6.3

final

genmo

intime(genloc)

Table 6

val

intime(genloc)

genloc

Table 6

at

genmo × tm

genmo

Table 9

inside

genloc × genrange

bool

Table 7

Appendix C: Type system in free space and road network

Table 13 Data types in [14, 18, 20]

Definition C.1

$$ \begin{array}{rll} \mathit{UBool} &=& \{(i,b)|i \in D_{\underline{\emph{interval}}}, b\in D_{{\underline{\textit{bool}}}}\}\\ D_{{\underline{\textit{mbool}}}}& =& \{<u_1,u_2,...,u_n>|n \geq 0,n \in D_{\underline{\emph{int}}}, ~\mathit{and}~ \forall i \in [1,n], u_i \in \mathit{UBool} \} \end{array} $$

Definition C.2

$$ \begin{array}{rll} \mathit{UPoint} &=& \{(i,p_1,p_2)|i \in D_{\underline{\emph{interval}}}, p_1,p_2 \in D_{{\underline{\textit{point}}}}\}\\ D_{{\underline{\textit{mpoint}}}} &=& \{<u_1,u_2,...,u_n>|n \geq 0,n \in D_{\underline{\emph{int}}}, ~\mathit{and} ~\forall i \in [1,n], u_i \in \mathit{UPoint}\} \end{array} $$

Definition C.3

$$ \begin{array}{rll} \mathit{NLoc} &=& \{(rid,pos,side)| rid \in D_{\underline{\emph{int}}}, pos \in D_{\underline{\emph{real}}}, side \in D_{{\underline{\textit{bool}}}}\}\\ D_{{\underline{\textit{gpoint}}}} &=& \{(n\_id,gp)| n\_id \in D_{\underline{\emph{int}}}, gp \in \mathit{NLoc} \} \end{array} $$

Definition C.4

$$ \begin{array}{rll} \mathit{NReg} &=& \{(rid,pos_1,pos_2)|rid \in D_{\underline{\emph{int}}}, pos_1, pos_2 \in D_{\underline{\emph{real}}} \}\\ D_{{\underline{\textit{gline}}}} &=& \{(n\_id,gl)| n\_id \in D_{\underline{\emph{int}}}, gl \in \mathit{NReg} \} \end{array} $$

Definition C.5

$$ \begin{array}{rll} \mathit{UGPoint} &=& \{(i,gp_1,gp_2)|i \in D_{\underline{\emph{interval}}}, gp_1,gp_2 \in \mathit{NLoc}~ \mathit{and}\\ && (i)~ gp_1.rid = gp_2.rid;\\ && (ii)~gp_1.side = gp_2.side \}\\ D_{{\underline{\textit{mgpoint}}}} &=& \{<u_1,u_2,...,u_n>|n \geq 0,n \in D_{\underline{\emph{int}}},~ \mathit{and}\ \forall i \in [1,n], u_i \in \mathit{UGPoint}\} \end{array} $$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, J., Güting, R.H. A generic data model for moving objects. Geoinformatica 17, 125–172 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-012-0158-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-012-0158-7

Keywords

Navigation