Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-scale decomposition of point process data

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To automatically identify arbitrarily-shaped clusters in point data, a theory of point process decomposition based on kth Nearest Neighbour distance is proposed. We assume that a given set of point data is a mixture of homogeneous processes which can be separated according to their densities. Theoretically, the local density of a point is measured by its kth nearest distance. The theory is divided into three parts. First, an objective function of the kth nearest distance is constructed, where a point data set is modelled as a mixture of probability density functions (pdf) of different homogeneous processes. Second, we use two different methods to separate the mixture into different distinct pdfs, representing different homogeneous processes. One is the reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo strategy, which simultaneously separates the data into distinct components. The other is the stepwise Expectation-Maximization algorithm, which divides the data progressively into distinct components. The clustering result is a binary tree in which each leaf represents a homogeneous process. Third, distinct clusters are generated from each homogeneous point process according to the density connectivity of the points. We use the Windowed Nearest Neighbour Expectation-Maximization (WNNEM) method to extend the theory and identify the spatiotemporal clusters. Our approach to point processes is similar to wavelet transformation in which any function can be seen as the summation of base wavelet functions. In our theory, any point process data set can be viewed as a mixture of a finite number of homogeneous point processes. The wavelet transform can decompose a function into components of different frequencies while our theory can separate point process data into homogeneous processes of different densities. Two experiments on synthetic data are provided to illustrate the theory. A case study on reservoir-induced earthquakes is also given to evaluate the theory. The results show the theory clearly reveals spatial point patterns of earthquakes in a reservoir area. The spatiotemporal relationship between the main earthquake and the clustered earthquake (namely, foreshocks and aftershocks) was also revealed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal R, Gehrke J, Gunopulos D, Raghavan P (1998) Automatic subspace clustering of high dimensional data for data mining applications. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD ’98 international conference on management of data. Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 94–105

  2. Allard D, Fraley C (1997) Nonparametric maximun likelihood Estimation of features in spatial point process using voronoi tessellation. J Am Stat Assoc 92:1485–1493

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ankerst M, Breunig MM, Kriegel H-P, Sander J (1999) OPTICS: Ordering points to identify the clustering structure. In: Proceedings of ACM-SIGMOD’99 International Conference on Management Data (Philadelphia: PA), pp 46–60

  4. Banfield JD, Raftery AE (1993) Model based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics 49:803–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Besag JE, Gleaves JT (1973) On the detection of spatial pattern in plant communities. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 45(Book 1):153–158

    Google Scholar 

  6. Byers S, Raftery AE (1998) Nearest-neighbor clutter removal for estimating features in spatial point processes. J Am Stat Assoc 93:557–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Byth K, Ripley BD (1980) On sampling spatial patterns by distance methods. Biometrics 36:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System, http://cdc.cma.gov.cn, accessed on March 2011

  9. Cressie NAC (1991) Statistics for spatial data (1st edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (Chapter 8)

  10. Daszykowski M, Walczak B, Massart DL (2001) Looking for natural patterns in data Part 1. Density-based approach. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 56:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deng M, Liu QL, Cheng T, Shi Y (2011) An adaptive spatial clustering algorithm based on delaunay triangulation. Comput Environ Urban Syst 35:320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Diggle PJ (1985) A kernel method for smoothing point process data. Appl Stat 34:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duczmal L, Cançado ALF, Takahashi RHC, Bessegato LF (2007) A genetic algorithm for irregularly shaped spatial scan statistics. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eberhardt LL (1967) Some developments in ‘distance sampling’. Biometrics 23:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ester M, Kriegel H-P, Sander J, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with Noise. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Portland, OR, pp 226–231

  16. Estivill-Castro V, Lee I (2002) Multi-level clustering and its visualization for exploratory spatial analysis. GeoInformatica 6:123–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Estivill-Castro V, Lee I (2002) Argument free clustering for large spatial point data sets. Comput Environ Urban Syst 26:315–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Filippone M, Sanguinetti G (2011) Approximate inference of the bandwidth in multivariate kernel density estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal 55:3104–3122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraley C, Raftery AE (1998) How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. Computer Journal 41:578–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fraley C, Raftery AE (2002) Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 97:611–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaudart J, Poudiougou B, Dicko A, Ranque S, Toure O, Sagara I (2008) Space–time clustering of childhood malaria at the household level: a dynamic cohort in a Mali village. BMC Public Health 6:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  22. Han JW, Kamber M, Tung AKH (2001) Spatial clustering methods in data mining. In: Miller HJ, Han JW (eds) Geographic data mining and knowledge discovery. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 188–217

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Hinneburg A, Keim DA (1998) An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, USA, New York, pp. 58–65

  24. Illian J, Penttinen A, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. John Wiley & Sons Ltd: West Sussex, 517 p

  25. Jin HD, Leung KS, Wong ML, Xu ZB (2005) Scalable model-based cluster analysis using clustering features. Pattern Recognition 38:637–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson RB, Zimmer WJ (1985) A more powerful test for dispersion using distance measurements. Ecology 6:1669–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karypis G, Han EH, Kumar V (1999) Chameleon: hierarchical clustering using dynamic modelling. IEEE Computer 32:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kulldorff M, Nagarwalla N (1995) Spatial disease clusters: detection and Inference. Stat Med 14:799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kulldorff M (1997) A spatial scan statistic. Comm Stat Theor Meth 26:1481–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kulldorff M, Heffernan R, Hartman J, Assuncao R, Mostashari F (2005) A space–time permutation scan statistic for disease outbreak detection. PLoS Med 2:216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin C-R, Chen M-S (2005) Combining partitional and hierarchical algorithms for robust and efficient data clustering with cohesion self-merging. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin CY, Chang CC (2005) A new density-based scheme for clustering based on genetic algorithm. Fundamenta Informaticae 68:315–331

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu D, Nosovskiy GV, Sourina O (2008) Effective clustering and boundary detection algorithm based on Delaunay triangulation. Pattern Recogn Lett 29:1261–1273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu P, Zhou D, Wu NJ (2007) VDBSCAN: varied density based spatial clustering of applications with noise. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on service systems and service management, Chengdu, China, pp 1–4

  35. Murtagh F, Starck JL (1998) Pattern clustering based on noise modeling in wavelet space. Pattern Recogn 31(7):847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Neill DB (2006) Detection of spatial and spatio-temporal clusters. Ph.D. Thesis of University of South Carolina

  37. Neill DB, Moore AW (2005) Anomalous spatial cluster detection. In: Proceeding of KDD 2005 workshop on data mining methods for anomaly detection. Chicago, Illinois, USA, pp 41–44

  38. Pascual D, Pla F, Sanchez JS (2006) Non parametric local density-based clustering for multimodal overlapping distributions. In: Proceedings of intelligent data engineering and automated learning (IDEAL2006), Spain, Burgos, pp 671–678

  39. Pei T (2011) A non-parameter index for differentiating between heterogeneity and randomness. Math Geosci 43:345–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pei T, Jasra A, Hand DJ, Zhu AX (2009) DECODE: a new method for discovering clusters of different densities in spatial data. Data Min Knowl Discov 18:337–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pei T, Zhu AX, Zhou CH, Li BL, Qin CZ (2006) A new approach to the nearest-neighbour method to discover cluster features in overlaid spatial point processes. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 20:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pei T, Zhu AX, Zhou CH, Li BL, Qin CZ (2009) Detecting feature from spatial point processes using Collective Nearest Neighbor. Comput Environ Urban Syst 33(6):435–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pei T, Zhou CH, Zhu AX, Li BL, Qin CZ (2010) Windowed nearest-neighbour method for mining spatio-temporal clusters in the presence of noise. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 24(6):925–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Prayag VR, Deshmukh SR (2000) Testing randomness of spatial pattern using Eberhardt’s index. Environmetrics 11:571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ripley BD (1977) Modelling spatial patterns. J Roy Stat Soc B 39:172–192

    Google Scholar 

  46. Roy S, Bhattacharyya DK (2005) An approach to find embedded clusters using density based techniques. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3816:523–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sander J, Ester M, Kriegel H, Xu X (1998) Density-based clustering in spatial databases: the algorithm GDBSCAN and its applications. Data Min Knowl Discov 2:169–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Schiffers K, Schurr FM, Tielborger K, Urbach C, Moloney K, Jeltsch F (2008) Dealing with virtual aggregation—a new index for analysing heterogeneous point patterns. Ecography 31:545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sheikholeslami G, Chatterjee S, Zhang A (1998) WaveCluster: a multi-resolution clustering approach for very large spatial databases. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on very large data bases, New York City, NY, pp. 428–439

  50. Shen CG, Chen HQ, Zhang HC, Huang LS, Li ZQ, Yang ZR, Wang DJ (1974) Xingfengjiang Reservoir Impounding earthquake and its influence on the Dam. Science In China 12(2):184–205

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tran TN, Wehrensa R, Lutgarde MCB (2006) KNN-kernel density-based clustering for high-dimensional multivariate data. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wan Y, Pei T, Zhou CH, Jiang Y, Qu CX, Qiao YL (2012) ACOMCD: a multiple cluster detection algorithm based on the spatial scan statistic and ant colony optimization. Comput Stat Data Anal 56:283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang MY, Yang MY, Hu YL, Li ZQ, Chen YT, Jin Y, Feng R (1976) Mechanism of the reservoir impounding earthquakes at Xinfengjiang and a preliminary endeavour to discuss their cause. Science in China 14(1):85–97

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yan P, Clayton MK (2006) A cluster model for space–time disease counts. Stat Med 25:867–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Young YT, Chang LJ (2007) Bayesian nearest-neighbor analysis via record value statistics and nonhomogeneous spatial Poisson processes. Comput Stat Data Anal 51(9):4438–4449

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was funded through support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Number: 41171345), a grant from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-YW-QN303), and grants from National Key Technology R&D Program (No. 2012AA12A403 and 2011BAH06B03).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chenghu Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pei, T., Gao, J., Ma, T. et al. Multi-scale decomposition of point process data. Geoinformatica 16, 625–652 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-012-0165-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-012-0165-8

Keywords

Navigation