Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Migration-Aware Genetic Optimization for MapReduce Scheduling and Replica Placement in Hadoop

  • Published:
Journal of Grid Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work addresses the optimization of file locality, file availability, and replica migration cost in a Hadoop architecture. Our optimization algorithm is based on the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II and it simultaneously determines file block placement, with a variable replication factor, and MapReduce job scheduling. Our proposal has been tested with experiments that considered three data center sizes (8, 16 and 32 nodes) with the same workload and number of files (150 files and 3519 file blocks). In general terms, the use of a placement policy with a variable replica factor obtains higher improvements for our three optimization objectives. On the contrary, the use of a job scheduling policy only improves these objectives when it is used along a variable replication factor. The results have also shown that the migration cost is a suitable optimization objective as significant improvements up to 34% have been observed between the experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beloglazov, A., Buyya, R.: Energy efficient allocation of virtual machines in cloud data centers. In: 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, pp 577–578 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2010.45

  2. Borthakur, D., et al.: Hdfs architecture guide. Hadoop Apache Project 53 (2008)

  3. Bose, S.K., Brock, S., Skeoch, R., Rao, S.: Cloudspider: combining replication with scheduling for optimizing live migration of virtual machines across wide area networks. In: Proceedings of the 2011 11th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing, CCGRID ’11, pp 13–22. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2011), https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2011.16

  4. Bryk, P., Malawski, M., Juve, G., Deelman, E.: Storage-aware algorithms for scheduling of workflow ensembles in clouds. J. Grid Comput. 14(2), 359–378 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-015-9355-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, Y., Ganapathi, A., Griffith, R., Katz, R.: The case for evaluating mapreduce performance using workload suites. In: 2011 IEEE 19th Annual International Symposium on Modelling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, pp 390–399 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1109/MASCOTS.2011.12

  6. Cheng, Z., Luan, Z., Meng, Y., Xu, Y., Qian, D., Roy, A., Zhang, N., Guan, G.: Erms: an elastic replication management system for hdfs. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing Workshops, pp 32–40 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1109/ClusterW.2012.25

  7. Dai, W., Ibrahim, I., Bassiouni, M.: A new replica placement policy for hadoop distributed file system. In: 2016 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing (HPSC), and IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS), pp 262–267 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataSecurity-HPSC-IDS.2016.30

  8. Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: Mapreduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Symposium on Opearting Systems Design & Implementation - Volume 6, OSDI’04, pp 10–10. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2004). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1251254.1251264

  9. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Durillo, J.J., Prodan, R.: Multi-objective workflow scheduling in amazon ec2. Cluster Comput. 17(2), 169–189 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-013-0325-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eltabakh, M.Y., Tian, Y., Özcan, F., Gemulla, R., Krettek, A., McPherson, J.: Cohadoop: Flexible data placement and its exploitation in hadoop. Proc. VLDB Endow. 4(9), 575–585 (2011). https://doi.org/10.14778/2002938.2002943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghomi, E.J., Rahmani, A.M., Qader, N.N.: Load-balancing algorithms in cloud computing: a survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 88, 50–71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.04.007 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804517301480]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grace, R.K., Manimegalai, R.: Dynamic replica placement and selection strategies in data grids—a comprehensive survey. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 74 (2), 2099–2108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2013.10.009 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743731513002207]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guerrero, C., Lera, I., Juiz, C.: Genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization of container allocation in cloud architecture. J. Grid Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-017-9419-x (2017)

  15. Guzek, M., Bouvry, P., Talbi, E.G.: A survey of evolutionary computation for resource management of processing in cloud computing [review article]. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 10(2), 53–67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2015.2405351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamrouni, T., Slimani, S., Charrada, F.B.: A survey of dynamic replication and replica selection strategies based on data mining techniques in data grids. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 48, 140–158 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2015.11.002 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197615002493]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hashem, I.A.T., Anuar, N.B., Marjani, M., Gani, A., Sangaiah, A.K., Sakariyah, A.K.: Multi-objective scheduling of mapreduce jobs in big data processing. Multimed. Tools Appl. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-4685-y (2017)

  18. Hashem, I.A.T., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N.B., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A., Khan, S.U.: The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: review and open research issues. Inf. Syst. 47, 98–115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2014.07.006 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437914001288]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ibn-Khedher, H., Hadji, M., Abd-Elrahman, E., Afifi, H., Kamal, A.E.: Scalable and cost efficient algorithms for virtual cdn migration. In: 2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN), pp 112–120 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.23

  20. Khezr, S.N., Navimipour, N.J.: Mapreduce and its applications, challenges, and architecture: a comprehensive review and directions for future research. J. Grid Comput. 15(3), 295–321 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-017-9408-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kimovski, D., Saurabh, N., Stankovski, V., Prodan, R.: Multi-objective middleware for distributed VMI repositories in federated cloud environment. Scalable Comput.: Pract. Exp. 17(4), 299–312 (2016) [http://www.scpe.org/index.php/scpe/article/view/1202]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lammel, R.: Google’s mapreduce programming model. revisited. Sci. Comput. Program. 70(1), 1–30 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Long, S.Q., Zhao, Y.L., Chen, W.: Morm: a multi-objective optimized replication management strategy for cloud storage cluster. J. Syst. Archit. 60(2), 234–244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2013.11.012 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/artice/pii/S1383762113002671]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. López-Pires, F., Barán, B.: Many-objective virtual machine placement. J. Grid Comput. 15 (2), 161–176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-017-9399-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lu, L., Shi, X., Jin, H., Wang, Q., Yuan, D., Wu, S.: Morpho: a decoupled mapreduce framework for elastic cloud computing. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 36 (Supplement C), 80–90 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.12.026. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X13002902. Special Section: Intelligent Big Data Processing Special Section: Behavior Data Security Issues in Network Information Propagation Special Section: Energy-efficiency in Large Distributed Computing Architectures Special Section: eScience Infrastructure and Applications

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maheshwari, N., Nanduri, R., Varma, V.: Dynamic energy efficient data placement and cluster reconfiguration algorithm for mapreduce framework. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 28(1), 119–127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.07.001 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X1100135X]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maio, V.D., Prodan, R., Benedict, S., Kecskemeti, G.: Modelling energy consumption of network transfers and virtual machine migration. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 56, 388–406 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.07.007 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X15002307]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Malik, S.U.R., Khan, S.U., Ewen, S.J., Tziritas, N., Kolodziej, J., Zomaya, A.Y., Madani, S.A., Min-Allah, N., Wang, L., Xu, C.Z., Malluhi, Q.M., Pecero, J.E., Balaji, P., Vishnu, A., Ranjan, R., Zeadally, S., Li, H.: Performance analysis of data intensive cloud systems based on data management and replication: a survey. Distrib. Parallel Databases 34(2), 179–215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10619-015-7173-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mansouri, Y., Toosi, A.N., Buyya, R.: Cost optimization for dynamic replication and migration of data in cloud data centers. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. PP(99), 1–1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCC.2017.2659728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Marler, R.T., Arora, J.S.: The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 41(6), 853–862 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Marozzo, F., Talia, D., Trunfio, P.: P2p-mapreduce: parallel data processing in dynamic cloud environments. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 78(5), 1382–1402 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2011.12.021. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022000011001668. JCSS Special Issue: Cloud Computing 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Milani, B.A., Navimipour, N.J.: A comprehensive review of the data replication techniques in the cloud environments: major trends and future directions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 64, 229–238 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.02.005 [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804516000795]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pawlikowski, K.: Steady-state simulation of queueing processes: Survey of problems and solutions. ACM Comput. Surv. 22 (2), 123–170 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1145/78919.78921 [http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/78919.78921]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Semenkin, E., Semenkina, M.: Self-configuring Genetic Algorithm with Modified Uniform Crossover Operator, pp 414–421. Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shen, H., Sarker, A., Yu, L., Deng, F.: Probabilistic network-aware task placement for mapreduce scheduling. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), pp 241–250 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTER.2016.48

  36. Shvachko, K., Kuang, H., Radia, S., Chansler, R.: The hadoop distributed file system. In: 2010 IEEE 26th Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST), pp 1–10 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1109/MSST.2010.5496972

  37. Song, J., He, H., Wang, Z., Yu, G., Pierson, J.M.: Modulo based data placement algorithm for energy consumption optimization of mapreduce system. J. Grid Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-016-9370-2 (2016)

  38. Vavilapalli, V.K., Murthy, A.C., Douglas, C., Agarwal, S., Konar, M., Evans, R., Graves, T., Lowe, J., Shah, H., Seth, S., Saha, B., Curino, C., O’Malley, O., Radia, S., Reed, B., Baldeschwieler, E.: Apache hadoop yarn: Yet another resource negotiator. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Symposium on Cloud Computing, SOCC ’13, pp 5:1–5:16. ACM, New York (2013), https://doi.org/10.1145/2523616.2523633. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2523616.2523633

  39. Wang, F., Qiu, J., Yang, J., Dong, B., Li, X., Li, Y.: Hadoop high availability through metadata replication. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Cloud Data Management, CloudDB ’09, pp 37–44. ACM, New York (2009), https://doi.org/10.1145/1651263.1651271. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1651263.1651271

  40. Wang, W., Zhu, K., Ying, L., Tan, J., Zhang, L.: Maptask scheduling in mapreduce with data locality: throughput and heavy-traffic optimality. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 24 (1), 190–203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2014.2362745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang, X., Wang, Y., Cui, Y.: A new multi-objective bi-level programming model for energy and locality aware multi-job scheduling in cloud computing. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 36, 91–101 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.12.004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X13002689. Special Section: Intelligent Big Data ProcessingSpecial Section: Behavior Data Security Issues in Network Information PropagationSpecial Section: Energy-efficiency in Large Distributed Computing Architectures Special Section: eScience Infrastructure and Applications

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wei, G., Vasilakos, A.V., Zheng, Y., Xiong, N.: A game-theoretic method of fair resource allocation for cloud computing services. J. Supercomput. 54(2), 252–269 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-009-0318-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wei, Q., Veeravalli, B., Gong, B., Zeng, L., Feng, D.: Cdrm: a cost-effective dynamic replication management scheme for cloud storage cluster. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, pp. 188–196 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTER.2010.24

  44. Wolpert, D.H., Macready, W.G.: No free lunch theorems for optimization. Trans. Evol. Comput. 1(1), 67–82 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.585893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wu, J., Yuan, H., He, Y., Zou, Z.: Chordmr: a p2p-based job management scheme in cloud. J. Netw. 9, 541–548 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xie, T., Sun, Y.: A file assignment strategy independent of workload characteristic assumptions. Trans. Storage 5 (3), 10:1–10:24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1629075.1629079 [http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1629075.1629079]

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Franklin, M.J., Shenker, S., Stoica, I.: Spark: cluster computing with working sets. In: Proceedings of the 2Nd USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, HotCloud’10, pp 10–10. USENIX Association, Berkeley (2010). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1863103.1863113

  48. Zhan, Z.H., Liu, X.F., Gong, Y.J., Zhang, J., Chung, H.S.H., Li, Y.: Cloud computing resource scheduling and a survey of its evolutionary approaches. ACM Comput. Surv. 47(4), 63:1–63:33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2788397 [http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2788397]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Q., Pan, X., Shen, Y., Li, W.: A novel scalable architecture of cloud storage system for small files based on p2p. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing Workshops, pp 41–47 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1109/ClusterW.2012.27

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO) of Spain and the European Commission (FEDER funds) throught the grant number TIN2017-88547-P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Guerrero.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guerrero, C., Lera, I. & Juiz, C. Migration-Aware Genetic Optimization for MapReduce Scheduling and Replica Placement in Hadoop. J Grid Computing 16, 265–284 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-018-9432-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-018-9432-8

Keywords

Navigation