Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Emotional interpretation using chaotic cuckoo public sentiment variations on textual data from Twitter

  • Published:
International Journal of Speech Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 10 October 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

The number of client share assessments on Twitter is an important stage for checking and perusing public sentiment. Such checking and review can offer data for choice making in different areas. In these canvases, we move further to translate estimation variants for machine learning algorithms. In trendy, the chaotic variable has unique characters, and firstly chaotic Levy flight is included in the proposed meta-heuristic for successfully delivering new arrangements. Secondly, the psychology version of feeling and confused grouping presented stream acknowledgment choice in the cuckoo search algorithm. Furthermore, we propose an LDA model and Modified Latent Dirichlet Allocation (M-LDA). These M-LDA subjects pick most advisor tweets for changed topics and build up a new setup known as the Emotional Chaotic Cuckoo Search LDA model. The proposed obligations, including discovering point, contrast among two arrangements of documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., & Passonneau, R. (2011). Sentiment analysis of Twitter data. In Proceedings of the ACL 2011 workshop on languages in social media (pp. 30–38).

  • Assi, C. M., Ye, Y., & Dixit, S. (2014). Dynamic bandwidth allocation for quality-of-service over ethernet PONs. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communication, 21(9), 1467–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badia, L., Merlin, S., & Zorzi, M. (2008). Resource management in IEEE 802.11 multiple access networks with price-based service provisioning. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(11), 4331–4340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H., Naaman, M., & Gravano, L. (2010). Learning similarity metrics for event identification in social media. In Proceedings of the third ACM WSDM, New York City.

  • Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Go, A., Bhayani, R., & Huang, L. (2009). Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision. Technical Paper. Stanford University.

  • Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl 1), 5228–5235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, G. (2009). Parameter estimation for text analysis. Technical report. Fraunhofer IGD and University of Leipzig, Germany.

  • Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD, Seattle, WA.

  • Jiang, L., Yu, M., Zhou, M., Liu, X., & Zhao, T. (2011). Target dependent Twitter sentiment classification. In Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Portland, OR: Human Language Technologies.

  • Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2009). Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD, Paris, France.

  • Liu, F., Liu, Y., & Weng, F. (2011). Why is “sxsw” trending? Exploring multiple text sources for Twitter topic summarization. In Proceedings of the workshop on language in social media, Portland, Oregon.

  • Luo, Z., Osborne, M., & Wang, T. (2013). An effective approach to tweets opinion retrieval. Springer Journal on World Wide Web,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-013-.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishne, G., & Glance, N. (2006). Predicting movie sales from blogger sentiment. In AAAI 2006 spring symposium on computational approaches to analysing weblogs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

  • Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peddinti, V. M. K., & Chintalapoodi, P. (2011). Domain adaptation in sentiment analysis of Twitter. In Analyzing microtext workshop. AAAI.

  • Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011). Lexicon based methods for sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 37(2), 267–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D., Li, X., Wu, X., Hu, W., & Maybank, S. J. (2007a). Supervised tensor learning. Knowledge and Information Systems, 13(1), 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D., Li, X., Wu, X., & Maybank, S. J. (2007b). General tensor discriminant analysis and Gabor features for gait recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(10), 1700–1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D., Li, X., Wu, X., & Maybank, S. J. (2009). Geometric mean for subspace selection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(2), 260–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D., Tang, X., Li, X., & Wu, X. (2006). Asymmetric bagging and random subspace for support vector machines-based relevance feedback in image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 28(7), 1088–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tausczik, Y., & Pennebaker, J. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., & Paltoglou, G. (2011). Sentiment in Twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, R., Zong, C., & Li, S. (2011). Ensemble of feature sets and classification algorithms for sentiment classification. Information Sciences: An International Journal, 181(6), 1138–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, VELS Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, 117, India

    U. V. Anbazhagu & R. Anandan

Authors
  1. U. V. Anbazhagu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Anandan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. V. Anbazhagu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-022-10006-9

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anbazhagu, U.V., Anandan, R. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Emotional interpretation using chaotic cuckoo public sentiment variations on textual data from Twitter. Int J Speech Technol 24, 281–290 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-020-09772-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-020-09772-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation