Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Facilitator’s Roles in a Videoconference Learning Environment

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper reports a study of a videoconference-based environment in decentralized university education and factors contributing to the success of teaching and learning in the environment. The focus of the paper is on the role of a person having the formal responsibilities of a technician. An ethnographic study conducted over the course of a year revealed that the contribution of this person far exceeded the scope of formal responsibilities. The person, who was acting in the setting as a facilitator, was found to possess expertise, which was critically important for supporting interaction between remote participants at several levels, such as attention management, time management, acquisition of setting-specific skills, and coordination within a larger institutional context. The findings suggest that “supra-situational” activities can be important factors for the successful functioning and development of emerging learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Borghoff U, Schlichter J. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Introduction to Distributed Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers J, Button G, Sharrock W. Workflow from within and without: Technology for cooperative work on the print industry shopfloor, In: Marmolin H, Sundblad Y, Schhmidt K, eds. Proceedings of The Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Stockholm, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1995:51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker GC, Star SL, Turner W, Gasser L, eds. Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work. Beyond the Great Divide. London, England, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J, ed. Designing Interactions: Psychology at the User Interface. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J, Kellogg W, Rosson M. The task-artifact cycle. In: Carroll J, ed. Designing Interactions: Psychology at the User Interface. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press,1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole M, Engeström Y. A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In: Salomon G, ed. Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond L, Roberts S. Effective Videoconferencing. Techniques for Better Business Meetings. Menlo Park, CA, USA: Crisp Publications Inc., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish P, Bly S. Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. In: Bauersfeld P, Bennett J, Lynch G, eds. Proceedings of SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’92). Monterey, CA, US: ACM Press, 1992:514–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström Y. Learning, Working, and Imagining: Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Helsinki, Finland: Sity Publisher, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbjörnsson M. Förutsättningar för den distribuerade utbildningen. Den fysiska och virtuella miljöns påverkan på inlärningsprocessen. Department of Informatics, Report No 97.14, Umea University, 1997.

  • Halverson C. Activity theory and distributed cognition: Or what does CSCW need to do with theories? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(1/2), Dordrecht: Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002;243–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Dourish P. Re-place-ing Space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW’96. Boston, MA, USA: ACM Press, 1996:67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedestig U, Kaptelinin V. Re-contextualization of teaching and learning in videoconference-based environments: An empirical study. In: Stahl G, ed., Proceedings CSCL 2002, Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community. Boulder: CO, USA. Hillsdale, NJ, USA. Lawrence Erlbaum, January 7–11, 2002;179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin V. Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In: Nardi B, ed. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, Chapter 3, 1996:45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin, V. Social thinking reaches out to software practice: The challenge of bridging activity systems. In: Dittrich Y, Floyd C, Klischewski R, eds. Social Thinking–-Software Practice. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, Chapter 3, 2002:45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin V, Cole M. Individual and collective activities in educational computer game playing. In: Koschmann T, Hall R, Miyake N, eds. CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum, Chapter 8, 2002:297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiper R. The VTC Technology Guide. A Manual of Video Teleconferencing Technology and Network Implementation. Keiper Associates Inc, Fairfax, VA, USA. 1990.

  • Leontiev AN. Activity, Consciousness, Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matusov E. Intersubjectivity without agreement. Mind, Culture, and Activity 1996;3(1):25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro E. Monsters: From systems to actor-networks. In: Braa K, Sørensen C, Dahlbom B, eds. Planet Internet. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden, 2000:239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi B. Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In: Nardi B, ed. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1996:69–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovsky VA. On the activity of the personality. Voprosy Psikhologii (Questions of Psychology), #3, 1975 (in Russian), 1975.

  • Piaget J. Genetic Epistemology. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs P. Transforming work: Collaboration, learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, 1995;38(9 Sept.):36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd edition. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf V, Schinzel B. Lecture and tutorial via the Internet–-Experiences from a pilot project connecting five universities. In: Müldner T, ed. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunication (ED-MEDIA & ED-TeleCOM 98), Freiburg, Germany, Charlottesville, VA, USA: AACE Press, 1998:1562–1567.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Hedestig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedestig, U., Kaptelinin, V. Facilitator’s Roles in a Videoconference Learning Environment. Inf Syst Front 7, 71–83 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-005-5339-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-005-5339-6

Key Words

Navigation