Skip to main content
Log in

Ubiquitous collaborative iTrust service: Exploring proximity collective wisdom

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ubiquitous e-service is one of the most recent links in the chain of evolution that has characterized the different eras of the internetworking environment. In order to leap the trust barrier for the users to embrace these ubiquitous e-services, we present a collaborative iTrust e-service for exploring proximal collective wisdom in the ad-hoc ubiquitous environment. By highlighting the homophily of e-service participants, these isolated individuals can be treated as a group with proximity. Proximity thus enables ad-hoc e-service participants to contribute their strength for ubiquitous collective wisdom. Simulation outcomes for trust decision quality enhancement show significant improvement over traditional designs. The iTrust e-service makes it possible for users to collaborate with the nearby user groups for establishing a reliable and trustworthy interaction environment. It also facilitates and empowers the potential benefits of various ubiquitous e-service applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberer, K., & Despotovic, Z. (2001). Managing trust in a peer-2-peer information system. CIKM’01, 310–317.

  • Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, & Rackham, H., translator. (1934). The nicomachean ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2004). Trust among internet traders: a behavioral economics approach. Analyse und Kritik, 26, 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V., & Raub, W. (2002). Embedded trust: Control and learning. Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity, 19, 167–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R., & Pezzulo, G. (2003). Integrating trustfulness and decision using fuzzy cognitive maps. Trust Management 2003, LNCS 2692, 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2000). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Eds.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition. University of Oxford: Department of Sociology http://www.sociology.ox.ac.uk/papers/dasgupta49-72.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T. C., & Cvetkovich, G. T. (1995). Social trust: Towards A cosmopolitan society. Praeger Publishers: Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzmann, M., & Schneider, M. (2004). A privacy-friendly loyalty system for electronic marketplaces. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE04), Taiwan.

  • Enzmann, M., & Schneider, M. (2005). Improving customer retention in E-commerce through a secure and privacy-enhanced loyalty system. forthcoming: Information Systems Frontiers.

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, S. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golbeck, J., Parsia, B., & Hendler, J. (2003). Trust networks on the semantic web. Proceedings of Cooperative Intelligent Agents 2003.

  • Govier, T. (1997). Social trust and human communities. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

  • Gupta, M., Judge, P., & Ammar, M. (2003). A reputation system for peer-to-peer networks. NOSSDAV’03, 144–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y. C., & Yuan, S. T. (2007). A privacy-aware identity design for exploring ubiquitous collaborative wisdom. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), 4490, 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinateder, M., & Rothermel, K. (2003). Architecture and algorithms for a distributed reputation system. Trust Management 2003, LNCS 2692, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis, freedom and control in modern society. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63, 967–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K., Lu, H., & Yu, T. (2004). A distributed trust and reputation management framework for E-services. IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpe. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D., & Chervany, N. (2002). What trust means in E-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 33–59, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mui, L., Halberstadt, A., & Mohtashemi, M. (2003). Evaluating reputation in multi-agents systems. AAMAS2002 Ws Trust, Reputation. LNAI 2631, 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1968). Laws. Plato in twelve volumes, vol. 11. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Sabater, J., & Sierra, C. (2002). Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. AAMAS’02, 475–482.

  • Shand, B., Dimmock, N., & Bacon, J. (2004). Trust for Ubiquitous, Transparent Collaboration. Wireless Networks, 10(6), 711–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000). Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twigg, A. (2003). A subjective approach to routing in P2P and ad hoc networks. Trust Management 2003, LNCS 2692, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiser, M. (1991). The computer of the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, U. G., Staamann, S. M., & Buttyan, L. (2000). A pesimistic approach to trust in mobile agent platforms. IEEE Internet Computing, 40–48.

  • ZigBee Organization (2005). ZigBee specification ver. 1.0, http://www.zigbee.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan-Chu Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, YC., Yuan, ST. Ubiquitous collaborative iTrust service: Exploring proximity collective wisdom. Inf Syst Front 11, 43–60 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9148-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9148-6

Keywords

Navigation