Skip to main content
Log in

Foresight for a responsible future with ICT

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ACM Code of Ethics asserts that computing professionals have an ethical responsibility to minimize the negative consequences of information and communication technologies (ICT). Negative consequences are rarely intended, but they can often be foreseen with careful sociotechnical analysis in advance of system building. Motivated by an interest in extremely complex sociotechnical contexts (e.g., mortgage lending and automated trading) where ICT appears to be having negative consequences in addition to many benefits, this paper identifies and evaluates future-oriented problem analysis and solution design tools in three potentially relevant literatures: 1) ICT ethics, 2) environmental sustainability, and 3) technology hazards. Several promising future-oriented technology analysis techniques (e.g., anticipatory technology ethics, technology roadmapping, morphological analysis, and control structure analysis) were found and are discussed in this paper, but much work remains to be done to customize them, integrate them, and codify them for use in education and high-quality IS research on very complex sociotechnical contexts like the global financial network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlqvist, T., Back, A., Heinonen, S., & Halonen, M. (2010). Road-mapping the societal transformation potential of social media. Foresight, 12(5), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves: Simon and Schuster

  • Beladi, H., & Mukherjee, A. (2012). Market structure and strategic bi-sourcing. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82(1), 210–219. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2012.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, U. (2012). An ethical framework in information systems decision making using normative theories of business ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brey, P. A. E. (2012). Anticipatory technology ethics for emerging technologies. Nanoethics, 6, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Robertson, G. G. (1991). A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9(2), 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. (1999). Mission improbable: using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L. (2006). Worst cases: terror and catastrophe in the popular imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, E. (2004). Futuring: the exploration of the future. Bethesda: World Future Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuhls, K. (2003). From forecasting to foresight processes–new participative foresight activities in Germany. Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Costa, O., Boden, M., & Friedewald, M. Science and technology roadmapping for policy intelligence: Lessons for future projects. In Second Prague Workshoop on futures studies methodology, Prague, 2005

  • Davies, T., & Chandler, R. (2012). Online deliberation design: Choices, criteria, and evidence. In T. Nabatchi, M. Wieiksner, J. Gastil, & Leighninger (Eds.), Democracy in motion: evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement (pp. 102–131). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreborg, K. H. (1996). Essence of backcasting. Futures, 28(9), 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foresight: The future of computer trading in financial markets, final project report (2010). London, UK: The Government Office for Science.

  • Frantzeskaki, N., & Loorbach, D. (2010). Towards governing infraystem transitions: reinforcing lock-in or facilitating change? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 1292–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Izquierdo, L. R., & Zeppini, P. (2012). Branching innovation, recombinant innovation, and endogenous technological transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 4, 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedewald, M., & Da Costa, O. (2003). Science and technology roadmapping; Ambient intelligence in everyday life (AmI@Life). European Science and Technology Observatory, Fraunhofer Institute.

  • Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2006). In D. Galletta & P. Zhang (Eds.), Human-computer interaction and management information systems: applications (Vol. 6, pp. 348–372). London: ME Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., & Smit, W. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32, 867–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L., & Harper, J. C. (2013). Rising to the challenges–reflections on future-oriented technology analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 467–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. J. (1994). The delphi method. (Vol. Futures Research Methodology--V3.0, pp. http://www.gerenciamento.ufba.br/Downloads/delphi%20%281%229.pdf. Accessed 212 January 2013): The Millennium Project

  • Gotterbarn, D., & Rogerson, S. (2005). Responsible risk assessment with software development: creating the software development impact statement. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 730–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotterbarn, D., Clear, T., & Kwan, C.-T. (2008). A practical mechanism for ethical risk assessment–A SoDIS inspection. In K. E. Himma & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The handbook of information and computer ethics. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S.P., & Ditto, P.H. (2012). Moral foundations theory: the pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2184440.

  • Gray, P., & Hovav, A. (1999). Using scenarios to understand the frontiers of IS. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(1), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P., & Hovav, A. (2008). From hindsight to foresight: applying futures research techniques in information systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22(12), 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P., & Hovav, A. (2011). Methods for studying the information systems future. In M. Chiasson, O. Henrdisson, H. Karsten, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Researching the future in information systems (pp. 299–316). Turku: IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, J.-E. (2010). Organizations gone wild: the causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 53–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1992). Utility and usability: research issues and development contexts. Interacting with Computers, 4(2), 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, D. H., & Sarewitz, D. (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, K., Marinelli, E., Scapolo, F., Ricci, A., & Sokolov, A. (2013). Quantitative and qualitative approaches in future-oriented technology analysis (FTA): from combination to integration? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 386–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom, T. (2003). Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society, 25, 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellstrom, T. (2009). New vistas for technology and risk assessment? The OECD programme on emerging systemic risks and beyond. Technology in Society, 31, 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyard, A. (2013). Non-technological innovations for sustainable transport. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(7), 1375–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. (1996). Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langheinrich, M. (2001a). Privacy by design — principles of privacy-aware ubiquitous systems. In G. D. Abowd, B. Brumitt, & S. Shafer (Eds.), Ubicomp 2001: ubiquitous computing; lecture notes in computer science (pp. 273–291). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Langheinrich, M. (2001b). Privacy by design—principles of privacy-aware ubiquitous systems. Paper presented at the Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing.

  • Leveson, N. G. (2011). Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveson, N. G., & Turner, C. S. (1993). An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer, 26(7), 18–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, M., & Bandhold, H. (2009). Scenario planning: the link between future and strategy (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Thissen, W. (2010). Introduction to the special section: infrastructures and transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 1195–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnish, K. (2012). Unblinking eyes: the ethics of automating surveillance. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, C. L., & Devezas, T. C. (2011). How many singularities are near and how will they disrupt human history? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1365–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchau, V. A. W. J., & van der Heijden, R. E. C. M. (2003). Innovative methodologies for exploring the future of automated vehicle guidance. Journal of Forecasting, 22, 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., & Mao, J.-Y. (2004). Participation in development and implementation: updating a tired, old concept for today’s is contexts. Journal of the AIS, 5(11-12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., Petrie, D., & Axline, S. (2000). Bucking the trends: what the future may hold for ERP packages. Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., Steinfield, C. W., Wigand, R. T., & Minton, G. (2006). Industry-wide IS standardization as collective action: the case of the U.S. residential mortgage industry. MIS Quarterly, 30(Special Issue), 439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., Dutta, A., Steinfield, C. W., & Wigand, R. T. (2008). The computerization movement in the U.S. home mortgage industry: Automated underwriting from 1980 to 2004. In K. L. Kraemer & M. S. Elliott (Eds.), Computerization movements and technology diffusion: from mainframes to ubiquitous computing (pp. 115–144). Medford: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusson, N., Kern, F., Watson, J., Arapostathis, S., Chalmers, H., Ghaleigh, N., et al. (2012). A Socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 903–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowall, W. (2012). Technology roadmaps for transition management: the case of hydrogen energy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 530–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), 894–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, E. (1995). Effective systems design and requirements analysis. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., Bessant, J., & Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 543–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (2010). The meltdown was not an accident. In M. Lounsbury, & P. M. Hirsch (Eds.), Markets on trial: the economic sociology of the U.S. financial crisis: part A (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 30) (pp. 309-330): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Phaal, R., & Muller, G. (2009). An architectural framework for roadmapping: towards visual strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., & Probert, D. R. (2004). Technology roadmapping–A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, I. d. S. (1977). The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, R. (2008). Foresight methodology. In L. Georghiou (Ed.), Handbook of technology foresight: concepts and practice (pp. 44-88): Edward Elgar.

  • Qureshi, Z. H. (2008). A review of accident modelling approaches for complex sociotechnical systems, DSTO-TR-2094. Edinburgh: Defence Science and Techology Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J., & Svedung, I. (2000). Proactive risk management in a dynamic society. Karlstad: Swedish Rescue Services Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, T. (2009). Future studies using morphological analysis. Adapted from an article for the Millennium Project, available from http://www.swemorph.com/.

  • Ritchey, T. (2011). Modeling alternative futures with general morphological analysis. World Future Review (Spring), 83–94, available at http://www.swemorph.com/.

  • Robinson, J. (2003). Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35(8), 839–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. K. R., Huang, L., Guo, Y., & Porter, A. L. (2013). Forecasting innovation pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin, G. I. (1997). Trapped in the net: the unanticipated consequences of computerization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scapolo, F., & Miles, I. (2006). Eliciting experts’ knowledge: a comparison of two methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 679–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirrneister, E., & Warnke, P. (2013). Envisioning structural transformation–lessons from a foresight project on the future of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80, 453–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1996). The art of the long view: Doubleday.

  • Smith, J. E., & Saritas, O. (2011). Science and technology foresight baker’s dozen: a pocket primer of comparative and combined foresight methods. Foresight, 13(2), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, B. C. (2011a). A critical view of emerging information and communications technologies and their social consequences. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 356

  • Stahl, B. C. (2011b). IT for a better future: how to integrate ethics, politics and innovation. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 9(3), 140–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, B. C. (2011c). What does the future hold? A critical view of emerging information and communication technologies and their social consequences. Turku: Paper presented at the Researching the Future in Information Systems: IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, B. C. (2011d). What future? Which technology? ON the problem of describing relevant futures. Turku: Paper presented at the Research the Future in Information Systems IFIP WG 8.2 Working Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, B. C., & Rogerson, S. (2009). Landscapes of ethical issues of emerging ICT applications in Europe. In Eighth International Conference of Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry, Corfu, Greece, 26-28 June 2009. http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~bstahl/publications/2009_ETICA_CEPE.pdf

  • Stahl, B. C., Heermink, R., Goujon, P., Flick, C., van den Hoven, J., Wakunuma, K., et al. (2010). Identifying the ethics of information and communications technologies: An essay on issues, concepts and method. International Journal of Technoethics, 1(4), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoodley, I., Bruce, C., & Edwards, S. (2010). Expanding ethical vistas of IT professionals. Information Systems Frontiers, 12(4), 379–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, H. (2011). A report on responsible research & innovations prepared for DG Research and Innovation. Matter: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavani, H. T. (2011). Ethics and technology: controversies, questions, and strategies for ethical computing (3rd ed.): Wiley

  • Tierney, K. J. (2007). From the margins to the mainstream? Diaster research at the crossroads. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 503–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. A., & Daim, T. (2008). A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 1396–1405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuominen, A., & Ahlqvist, T. (2010). Is the transport system becoming ubitquitous? Socio-technical roadmapping as a tool for integrating the development of transport policies and intelligent transport systems and services in Finland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO technology foresight manual (2005a). (Vol. Volume 2: Technology foresight in action). https://www.unido.org/foresight/registration/dokums_raw/volume2_unido_tf_manual.pdf: United Nations.

  • UNIDO technology foresight manual (2005b). (Vol. Volume 1: Organization and Methods). https://www.unido.org/foresight/registration/dokums_raw/volume1_unido_tf_manual.pdf: United Nations.

  • van den Ende, J., Mulder, K., Knot, M., Moors, E., & Vergragt, P. (1998). Traditional and modern technology assessment: toward a toolkit. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven, J., & Vermaas, P. E. (2007). Nano-technology and privacy: On continuous surveillance outside the Panopticon. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2007(32), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hoven, J., Helbing, D., Pedreschi, D., Domingo-Ferrer, Gianotti, F., & Christen, M. (2012). FutureICT–the road towards ethical ICT. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1999). The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 271–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbong, G. P. J., & Geels, F. W. (2010). Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 1214–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Schomberg, R. (2011). Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. Luxembourg: Publication office of the European Union, http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/doucument_library/pdf_06/mep-rapport-2011_en.pdf.

  • Walsham, G. (2012). Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 87–93. doi:10.1057/jit.2012.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 4, 516–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston (2010). Bad ideas? An arresting history of our inventions: how our finest inventions nearly finished us off: Bantam Press.

  • Wolstenholme, E. F. (2003). Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypal structures in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 19(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 199–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. (2006). The internet and the transformation of the reality of everyday life: toward a new analytic stance in sociology. Sociological Inquiry, 76(4), 458–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, F. (1967). The morphologial approach to discovery, invention, research and construction. In F. Zwicky & A. G. Wilson (Eds.), New methods of thought and procedures (pp. 273–297). New Work: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge helpful comments from Kevin Crowston, Gesa Kirsch, Wee-Kiat Lim, Anne Rutkowski, MonideepaTarafdar, Georg von Krogh, and our editors and reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Mentzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markus, M.L., Mentzer, K. Foresight for a responsible future with ICT. Inf Syst Front 16, 353–368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9479-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9479-9

Keywords

Navigation