Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How business process reengineering affects information technology investment and employee performance under different performance measurement

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Business Process Reengineering (BPR) is an approach for business process transformation and unconstrained reshaping of all business processes. This study examines the impact of BPR on information technology (IT) investment and employee performance. In this study, it is considered to be likely that employee performance will be improved by performance measurement, and thus, we intend to set up a performance measurement process which is similar to the employee’s goal setting. To this end, this study examines the relationship existed between performance measurement and performance. The obtained results show a positive relation existing between IT and BPR implementation, and employee performance and BPR implementation. Moreover, the empirical result supports that performance measurement associated with cost reduction and lead time shortening in the internal processes and quality improvement in the external processes can improve the performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahadi, H. R. (2004). An examination of the role of organizational enablers in business process reengineering and the impact of information technology. Information Resources Management Journal, 17(4), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mashari, M., & Zairi, M. (1999). BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factors. Journal of Business Process Management, 5(1), 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attaran, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering. Information & Management, 41, 585–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marking Science, 16(1), 76–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption intention in GSS: importance of beliefs. Data Base Advances, 26, 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modelling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–341). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

  • Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6, 118–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. R., & Larcker, F. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gattorna, J. I., & Berger, A. J. (2001). Supply chain cyber mastery: Building high performance supply chains of the future. London: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2010). Enterprise resource planning systems implementation as a complex project: a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(4), 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goll, E. O. (1992). Let’s debunk the myths & misconceptions about reengineering. APICS, The Performance Advantage, 2(12), 29–32.

  • Guimaraes, T., & Bond, W. (1996). Empirically assessing the impact of BPR on manufacturing firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A., & Nath, B. (1997). The role of information technology in business process reengineering. International Journal of Production Economics, 50, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, A., & Cragg, P. (1996). Business process reengineering in the small firm: a case study. Journal of Information, 34(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Chandrasekaran, A. (2009). Evolving role of business process reengineering: a perspective of employers. Industrial and Commercial Training, 1(7), 382–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, H., McHugh, P., Pendlebury, J., & Wheeler, W. (1993). Business process reengineering: Break point strategies for market dominance. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Atkinson, A. A. (1998). Advanced management accounting (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A. (1975). A review of research on the application of goal setting in organization. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 824–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock, D. (2001). Book review on Benchmarking. Sylvia Codling, Gower, Aldershot, 1998. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 253–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmoller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variables path modeling with partial least squares. Heildelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ly, L. T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Göser, K., & Dadam, P. (2012). On enabling integrated process compliance with semantic constraints in process management systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mary, K. (2008). Eight ways to boost your career in 2008. Computerworld, 42(2), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozcelik, Y. (2010a). Do business process reengineering projects payoff? Evidence from the United States. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcelik, Y. (2010b). IT-enabled reengineering: Productivity impacts. USA: Information Resources Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrozzo, D., & Stepper, J. (1994). Successful reengineering. Peterborough, 19(12), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, R., Melville, N., & Lawle, E. (2010). Information technology infrastructure, organizational process redesign, and business value: an empirical analysis. Decision Support Systems, 49(4), 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2006). Accounting information systems. New Jersey: Person Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2013) Investments in enterprise integration technology: An event study published on 29 September 2013. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–14.

  • Wagenheim, G. D., & Reurink, H. J. (1991). Customer service in public administration. Public Administration Review, 51(3), 23–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wold, H. (1985). Partial least squares. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 581–591). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Tan, W. A., Zhen, H., & Shen, W. (2008). An approach to enterprise process dynamic modeling supporting enterprise process evolution. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(5), 611–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David C. Yen.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 9 The questionnaire

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, S.Y., Lee, CH., Chiu, AA. et al. How business process reengineering affects information technology investment and employee performance under different performance measurement. Inf Syst Front 17, 1133–1144 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9487-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9487-4

Keywords

Navigation