Abstract
Multi-round combinatorial auctions have been infrequently employed for essentially two reasons, the computational complexity of the Winner Determination Problem, and the need to provide information feedback to bidders to enable them to bid meaningfully. Here we take a fresh look at the second issue. In business environments, a bidder’s valuation of a package can change in response to signals from other bidders. In the absence of feedback, bidders are forced to expend time and resources to determine these package valuations as accurately as possible. We propose a multi-round combinatorial auction scheme with inter-round feedback called RevalSlot that helps a bidder to converge to an appropriate valuation for a package. This is likely to prove attractive to bidders and thereby increase bidder participation. We also propose a simplified version of the scheme called RevalBundle that requires fewer solutions of the Winner Determination Problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adomavicius, G., & Gupta, A. (2005). Toward comprehensive real-time bidder support in iterative combinatorial auctions. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 169–185.
Adomavicius, G., Curley, S., Gupta, A., & Sanyal, P. (2012). Effect of information feedback on bidder behavior in continuous combinatorial auctions. Management Science, 58(4), 811–830.
Ausubel, L.M., & Milgrom, P. (2006a). Ascending proxy auctions. (See [12]:79–98).
Ausubel, L.M., & Milgrom, P. (2006b). The lovely but lonely Vickrey auction. In Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), Combinatorial auctions (pp. 17-40). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ausubel, L.M., Cramton, P., & Milgrom, P. (2006). The clock proxy auction: A practical combinatorial auction design. In Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), Combinatorial auctions (pp. 115–138). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Banks, J., Ledyard, J. O., & Porter, D. (1989). Allocating uncertain and unresponsive resources: an experimental approach. RAND Journal of Economics, 20, 1–25.
Barkakati, S., & Zeineddine, H. (2013). On achieving secure collaboration in supply chains. Information Systems Frontiers. doi:10.1007/s10796-013-9448-3.
Brunner, C., Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., & Ledyard, J. O. (2010). An experimental test of flexible combinatorial spectrum auction formats. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(1), 39–57.
Caplice, C., & Sheffi, Y. (2006). Combinatorial auctions for truckload transportation. In Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), Combinatorial auctions (pp. 539–571). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chakraborty, S., Sen, A.K., & Bagchi, A. (2008). Bidder valuation of packages in combinatorial auctions. 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), Hawaii, USA.
Chakraborty, S., Sen, A.K., & Bagchi, A. (2009). Revaluation of packages by bidders in combinatorial auctions. 42nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2009), Hawaii, USA.
Chang, A. S. (2012). Time dynamics of overlapping e-auction mechanisms: information transfer, strategic user behavior and auction revenue. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 331–342.
Clarke, E. H. (1971). Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 11, 17–33.
Copeland, T., Koller, T., & Murrin, J. (2000). Valuation. New York: Wiley.
Cramton, P. (2006). Simultaneous ascending auctions. In Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), Combinatorial auctions (pp. 99–114). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Day, R. W., & Raghavan, S. (2008). A combinatorial procurement auction featuring bundle price revelation without free-riding. Decision Support Systems, 44, 621–640.
Goeree, J.O., Holt, A.C., & Ledyard, J.O. (2006). An experimental comparison of the FCC’s combinatorial and non-combinatorial simultaneous multiple round auctions. Report for Wireless Telecommunications Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Greewald, A., & Boyan, J. (2001). Bidding algorithms for simultaneous auctions: A case study. ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-01).
Groves, T. (1973). Incentives in teams. Econometrica, 41, 617–631.
Jones, J. L., & Koehler, G. J. (2002). Combinatorial auction using rule-based bids. Decision Support Systems, 34, 59–74.
Kagel, J. H., Lien, Y., & Milgrom, P. (2010). Ascending prices and package bidding: a theoretical and experimental analysis. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2, 160–185.
Kelly, F., & Steinberg, R. (2000). A combinatorial auction with multiple winners for universal service. Management Science, 46, 586–596.
Klemperer, P. (2004). Auctionsm, theory and practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Koksalan, M., Leskela, R., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2009). Improving efficiency in multiple-unit combinatorial auctions: bundling bids from multiple bidders. Decision Support Systems, 48, 103–111.
Krishna, V. (2002). Auction theory. London: Academic.
Kwasnica, A. M., Ledyard, J. O., Porter, D., & Demartini, C. (2005). A new and improved design for multiobject iterative auctions. Management Science, 51(3), 419–434.
Ledyard, J. O., Olson, M., Porter, D., Swanson, J. A., & Torma, D. P. (2002). The first use of a combined value auction for transportation services. Interfaces, 32(5), 4–12.
Lee, C., Ho, P., & Hwang, M. (2009). A secure e-auction scheme based on group signatures. Information Systems Frontiers, 11(3), 335–343.
Lehmann, D., Muller, R., & Sandholm, T. (2006). The winner determination problem. In Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), Combinatorial auctions (pp. 297–318). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Leskela, R., Teich, J., Wallenius, H., & Wallenius, J. (2007). Decision support for multi-unit combinatorial bundle auctions. Decision Support Systems, 43, 420–434.
Leyton-Brown, K., Pearson, M., et al. (2000). Towards a universal test suite for combinatorial auction algorithms. ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce: 66–76.
Parkes, D.C. (1999). iBundle: An efficient ascending price package auction. Electronic Commerce.
Porter, D., Rassenti, S., Roopnarine, A., & Smith, V. (2003). Combinatorial auction design. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 100, 11153–11157.
Rassenti, S. J., Smith, V. L., & Bulfin, R. L. (1982). A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 402–417.
Sabat, H. K. (2008). Spectrum acquisition strategies adopted by wireless carriers in the USA. Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 77–102.
Sandholm, T. (2000). Approaches to winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Decision Support Systems, 28, 165–176.
Sandholm, T. (2006). Optimal winner determination algorithms. In Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), Combinatorial Auctions (pp. 337–368). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Teich, J., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., & Zaitsev, A. (2006). A multi-attribute e-auction mechanism for procurement: theoretical foundations. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 90–100.
Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16, 8–37.
Walsh, W. E., Wellman, M. P., & Ygge, F. (2000). Combinatorial auctions for supply chain formation. ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC-00, 260–269.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. They would also like to thank Prof. D. Parkes for providing the code for the ascending proxy auction.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: The RevalSlot algorithm
Appendix: The RevalSlot algorithm
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chakraborty, S., Sen, A.K. & Bagchi, A. Addressing the valuation problem in multi-round combinatorial auctions. Inf Syst Front 17, 1145–1160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9491-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9491-8