Skip to main content
Log in

Blockchain in Context

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blockchain has been used primarily in cryptocurrency applications like Bitcoin and Ethereum. These use cases show the staying power of blockchain technology and suggest additional uses such as smart contracting. We suggest these use cases, while producing knowledge, do not forecast the future of blockchain. Learning-by-doing reveals the evolution of blockchain as a sociotechnical system, suggesting that there is more to learn. Predicting how sociotechnical systems will evolve is difficult, but historical and lexical analyses suggest two areas for blockchain growth. One is provenance, authentication through recording of ownership or other control state, applicable to jewels, real property, art works, food stuffs, designer items, and anything else where genuineness is valued. The other is chain-of-custody, proving that duty of care has been faithfully executed regarding living beings (children, people in legal custody, research subjects, research animals, pets), or that inanimate things (evidence, data, representations such as photographs) have not been tampered with.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This paper does not explain the details of blockchain. See the following: (Beck 2018; Beck et al. 2017, 2018, Cao 2018; Marr 2017; XBT Network 2018))

  2. This is a fraught point: some equate distributed with decentralized, although they are not the same. It is an old issue. For interesting discussions of this see (King 1983; Buterin 2017).

  3. Some prefer “exploit” to “hack.” This paper uses the terms synonymously to mean a person doing something with a computer that is not allowed by laws or rules.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Roman Beck, Roger Ehrenberg, David Kobrosky, and Victoria Lemieux for their help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Leslie King.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ehrenberg, A.J., King, J.L. Blockchain in Context. Inf Syst Front 22, 29–35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09946-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09946-6

Keywords

Navigation