Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recovering Troubled IT Projects: The Roles of Transformational Leadership and Project Complexity

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovery of troubled IT projects is a vital issue for many organizations. Understanding how leadership and project complexity affect a recovery process could enable organizations to do a better job in recovering troubled projects. A few studies have examined the relationship between leadership and project management. However, the recovery process and project complexity have not been integrated into the relationship between leadership and project recovery. Change leadership, leadership effectiveness, and project complexity are empirically determined to be positively associated with the recovery process based on quantitative data collected from 166 IT project team members. Leadership effectiveness is the variable that impacts the recovery process the most. And, the recovery process significantly affects product success and process success of troubled projects. The findings imply that organizations should focus more on leadership effectiveness to improve recovery processes. To facilitate the process and product success of a project recovery, organizations should rely on a recovery process that includes multiple optional remedies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aga, D. A., Noorderhaven, N., & Vallejo, B. (2016). Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 806–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alami, A. (2016). Why do information technology projects fail. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaskar, A. (2013). Managing troubled projects. In Presented at the PMI global congress. New Orleans, LA: Project Management Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amagoh, F. (2009). Leadership development and leadership effectiveness. Management Decision, 47(6), 989–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayman, R., Chemers, M. M., & Fiedler, F. (1995). The contingency model of leadership effectiveness: Its levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, C. (2008). Towards an integrated measurement of IS project performance: The project performance scorecard. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-008-9083-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B, M., & Riggio, R, E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.

  • Basten, D., Joosten, D., & Mellis, W. (2011). Managers’ perceptions of information system project success. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(2), 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berson, Y., Da’as, R., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). How do leaders and their teams bring about organizational learning and outcomes? Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorvatn, T., & Wald, A. (2018). Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(6), 876–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., & Dixon, R. D. (2010). Love, forgiveness, and trust: Critical values of the modern leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavazotte, F., Moreno, V., & Hickmann, M. (2012). Effects of leader intelligence, personality and emotional intelligence on transformational leadership and managerial performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(3), 443–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N. (2012). Leadership in projects: What we know from the literature and new insights. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 18(3/4), 128–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, Y., Myers, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., et al. (2015). Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 143–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eom, M., Wu, W., Preston, D., & Luftman, J. (2020). Effective IT project leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(2) https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol19/iss2/6.

  • Floricel, S., Michela, J. L., & Piperca, S. (2016). Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1360–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, L., & Dulewicz, V. (2008). Do project managers’ leadership competencies contribute to project success? Project Management Journal, 39(4), 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated) a systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(9), 966–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2002). Change management–or change leadership? Journal of Change Management, 3(4), 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, A., Dixon, P., & Gilley, J. W. (2008). Characteristics of leadership effectiveness: Implementing change and driving innovation in organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19(2), 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, R, L. (1998). Software runaways. Prentice Hall.

  • Gradwell, S, S. (2004). Communicating planned change: A case study of leadership credibility. http://dspace.library.drexel.edu/handle/1860/324. Accessed 23 July 2018.

  • Griffith-Cooper, B., & King, K. (2007). The partnership between project management and organizational change: Integrating change management with change leadership. Performance Improvement, 46(1), 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanisch, B., & Wald, A. (2014). Effects of complexity on the success of temporary organizations: Relationship quality and transparency as substitutes for formal coordination mechanisms. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(2), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.08.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. T., Uhl-Bien, M., Avolio, B. J., & Cavarretta, F. L. (2009). A framework for examining leadership in extreme contexts. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 897–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartono, B., Sulistyo, S., & Umam, M. (2019). Leadership profiles of successful project managers in Indonesia. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 12(2), 274–301. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herold, D. M., Fedor, D. B., Caldwell, S., & Liu, Y. (2008). The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees’ commitment to a change: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 346–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49(6), 493–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou, C. L., & Dexter, A. S. (2004). Turning around runaway information technology projects. California Management Review, 46(4), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou, C. L., & Dexter, A. S. (2005). Surviving IT project cancellations. Communications of the ACM, 48(4), 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ika, L. A. (2009). Project success as a topic in project Management Journals. Project Management Journal, 40(4), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPA. (2018). IPA annual report on major projects 2017–18. Infrastructure and Projects Authority. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/721978/IPA_Annual_Report_2018__2_.pdf. Accessed 12 October 2018.

  • Janssen, M., van der Voort, H., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2015). Failure of large transformation projects from the viewpoint of complex adaptive systems: Management principles for dealing with project dynamics. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9511-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaulio, M. A. (2008). Project leadership in multi-project settings: Findings from a critical incident study. International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 338–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., & Montealegre, R. (2000). Cutting your losses: How executives can extricate their organizations when big projects go awry. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., & Robey, D. (1999). Turning around troubled software projects: An exploratory study of the deescalation of commitment to failing courses of action. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 63–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method Bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J, P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard business press.

  • Kouzes, J, M., & Posner, B, Z. (2011). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it (Vol. 244). Wiley

  • Lawrence, K. A., Lenk, P., & Quinn, R. E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. M. (1999). A research model of project complexity and goal commitment effects on project outcome. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 6(2), 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, S. P., Peón, J. M. M., & Ordás, C. J. V. (2005). Organizational learning as a determining factor in business performance. Learning Organization, 12(3), 227–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, I. (2010). How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 629–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mersino, A. (2018). Agile project success rates vs. Waterfall Projects. Vitality Chicago Inc. https://vitalitychicago.com/blog/agile-projects-are-more-successful-traditional-projects/. Accessed 21 May 2019.

  • Morcov, S., Pintelon, L., & Kusters, R, J. (2020). Definitions, characteristics and measures of IT project complexity - a systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/3058575. Accessed 12 July 2020

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2007). Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R., & Turner, R. (2010). Leadership competency profiles of successful project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 437–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, R., Geraldi, J., & Turner, J. R. (2012). Relationships between leadership and success in different types of project complexities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2011.2114350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S. L., Pan, G. S., Newman, M., & Flynn, D. (2006). Escalation and de-escalation of commitment to information systems projects: Insights from a project evaluation model. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(3), 1139–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankratz, O., & Basten, D. (2018). Opening the black box: Managers’ perceptions of IS project success mechanisms. Information & Management, 55(3), 381–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., & Mitroff, I. I. (1993). From crisis prone to crisis prepared: A framework for crisis management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 7(1), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90049-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatter, S. (2011). Leading corporate turnaround: How leaders fix troubled companies. Wiley

  • Thite, M. (2000). Leadership styles in information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 18(4), 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R., & Zolin, R. (2012). Forecasting success on large projects: Developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyssen, A. K., Wald, A., & Heidenreich, S. (2014). Leadership in the context of temporary organizations: A study on the effects of transactional and transformational leadership on followers’ commitment in projects. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(4), 376–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, L.-A., Marle, F., & Bocquet, J.-C. (2011a). Using a Delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5388–5405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, L.-A., Marle, F., & Bocquet, J.-C. (2011b). Measuring project complexity using the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 718–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, L., Keil, M., & Rai, A. (2004). Understanding software project risk: A cluster analysis. Information & Management, 42(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, K. M., & Daniels, C. B. (2013). The root cause of failure in complex IT projects: Complexity itself. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, B. (1999). What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects. Information Management & Computer Security, 7(1), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, L. P., & James, E. H. (2008). Linking crisis management and leadership competencies: The role of human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(3), 352–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L.-R., Huang, C.-F., & Wu, K.-S. (2011). The association among project manager’s leadership style, teamwork and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 29(3), 258–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Li, N., Ullrich, J., & van Dick, R. (2015). Getting everyone on board: The effect of differentiated transformational leadership by CEOs on top management team effectiveness and leader-rated firm performance. Journal of Management, 41(7), 1898–1933.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, Hunan Province, China

    Hui Lei

  2. ISA Department, Farmer School of Business Administration, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA

    Xiang Fang & T. M. Rajkumar

  3. Finance and Quantitative Analysis Department, Gatton College of Business & Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0034, USA

    Clyde Holsapple

Authors
  1. Hui Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiang Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. M. Rajkumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Clyde Holsapple
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Fang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, H., Fang, X., Rajkumar, T.M. et al. Recovering Troubled IT Projects: The Roles of Transformational Leadership and Project Complexity. Inf Syst Front 24, 233–245 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10068-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10068-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation