Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

E-Government and Entrepreneurship: Online Government Services and the Ease of Starting Business

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Governments around the world are making active efforts to encourage entrepreneurship. At the same time, governments have also embraced digital technology, particularly the online delivery of government services. This paper examines the effect of offering government services online on the ease of setting up new businesses around the world. Panel data from almost 200 countries between 2002 and 2010 were assembled from multiple public databases and analyzed with fixed-effects regression models in STATA to measure how bringing more government services online affected the number of procedures required to start a new business, as well as the time and cost of these procedures. In this first multi-country time-series study of the effect of e-Government on entrepreneurship, free from the biases of cross-sectional studies, we find that providing more government services online did indeed make it easier to start up business, as did improvements in the ICT infrastructure and education level of the country. We find that the online delivery of government services benefited entrepreneurs by reducing the number of procedures needed to start a business, and by reducing the time and cost of these procedures. Our study provides strong evidence for the positive effect of e-Government on entrepreneurship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. M. (2012). Size matters: Entrepreneurial entry and government. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderete, M. V. (2018). The mediating role of ICT in the development of open government. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(3), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Yang, T. (2012). What did Stinchcombe really mean? Designing research to test the liability of newness among new ventures. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2(3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, G. D. O., & Zouain, D. M. (2016). E-government impact on business and entrepreneurship in high-, upper-middle- and lower-income countries from 2008 to 2014: A linear mixed model approach. Global Business Review, 17(4), 743–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Muwil, A., Weerakkody, V., El-haddadeh, R., & Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Balancing digital-by-default with inclusion: A study of the factors influencing E-inclusion in the UK. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 635–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendsen, R., Peters, O., ter Hedde, M., & van Dijk, J. (2014). Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 160–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asongu, S. A., Nwachukwu, J. C., & Aziz, A. (2018). Determinants of Mobile phone penetration: Panel threshold evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(2), 81–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Forward to the past: Lessons for the future of e-government from the story so far. Information Polity, 17(3, 4), 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J. L., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs' social networks, and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1024–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, L. A., & McNutt, J. G. (2011). Virtual government–citizen relations: Informational, transactional, or collaborative? Administration & Society, 42, 836–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter, L., Lima, F., Taylor, L. J., & Venâncio, A. (2014). Do entry regulations deter entrepreneurship and job creation? Evidence from recent reforms in Portugal. The Economic Journal, 124(577), 805–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffat, A. (2015). Street-level bureaucracy and e-government. Public Management Review, 17(1), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C., & Navarra, D. D. (2005). Good governance and development aid: Risks and challenges of E-government in Jordan. Information Technology for Development, 11(2), 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A. (2007). E-government: Towards the E-bureaucratic form? Journal of Information Technology, 22(3), 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravo, T. A., & Piza, C. (2019). The impact of business-support services on firm performance: A meta-analysis. Small Business Economics, 53(3), 753–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, S. S., & Das, A. (2014). India shining? A two-wave study of business constraints upon micro and small manufacturing firms in India. International Small Business Journal, 32(2), 180–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, J., DiRienzo, C., & Burbridge, J. (2009). Global E-government and the role of trust: A cross country analysis. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2017). A longitudinal study of e-government maturity. Information & Management, 54(4), 415–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dau, L. A., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2014). To formalize or not to formalize: Entrepreneurship and pro-market institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 668–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgosha, M, S., Saheb, T., Hajiheydari, N.. 2020. Modelling the asymmetrical relationships between digitalisation and sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10029-0.

  • Desai, M., Gompers, P., Lerner, J.. (2003). Institutions, capital constraints and entrepreneurial firm dynamics: Evidence from Europe (Working Paper No.10165). NBER, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10165.

  • Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutil, P., Howard, C., Langford, J., & Roy, J. (2008). Rethinking government-public relationships in a digital world: Customer, clients, or citizens? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(1), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Shoubaki, A., Laguir, I., den Besten, M.. (2019). Human capital and SME growth: The mediating role of reasons to start a business. Small Business Economics, 54,1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0129-y.

  • Elena-Bucea, A., Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira T., Coelho, P, S.. (2020). Assessing the role of age, education, Gender and Income on the Digital Divide: Evidence for the European Union. Information Systems Frontiers, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10012-9.

  • Fotopoulos, G., & Storey, D. J. (2019). Public policies to enhance regional entrepreneurship: Another programme failing to deliver? Small Business Economics, 53(1), 189–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M., & Champy, J. A. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbig, N., Gil-García, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (2014). Analysis of Panel Data. 3rd edition. Econometric society monographs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A., & Olnes, S. (2016). The nature of public e-services and their quality dimensions. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 647–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, G., & Erlingsson, G. Ó. (2014). More E-government, less street-level bureaucracy? On legitimacy and the human side of public administration. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(3), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators, Methodology and Analytical Issues. In: Policy Research Working Paper 5430. The World Bank, Development Research Group, Macroeconomics and Growth Team.

  • Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, J. (2016). The ubiquitous influence of regulation on entrepreneurial action: How relations with accountants mediate small company adaptation to financial reporting legislation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(2), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, L., Amit, R., & Guillen, M. F. (2010). Entrepreneurship and firm formation across countries. In J. Lerner & A. Schoar (Eds.), International differences in entrepreneurship (pp. 129–158). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S, H., Gokalp, O, N., Kim, J.. (2019). Firm–government relationships: A social exchange view of corporate tax compliance. Global Strategy Journal, https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1340

  • Martin, N., Matt, C., Niebel, C., & Blind, K. (2019). How data protection regulation affects startup innovation. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 1307–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, W., & Williams, D. W. (2018). Venture creation persistence: Overcoming stage-gate issues. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(5), 1016–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, C. S., & Zachary, R. K. (2015). The theory of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, T. (2018). Examining the anti-corruption effect of e-government and the moderating effect of national culture: A cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngafeeson, M. N., & Merhi, M. I. (2013). E-government diffusion: Evidence from the last decade. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 9(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistotskaya, M., & Cingolani, L. (2015). Bureaucratic structure, regulatory quality, and entrepreneurship in a comparative perspective: Cross-sectional and panel data evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 519–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, N. (2015). 90% of startups fail: Here's what you need to know about the 10%.  Retrieved from Forbes, 16-Jan-2015: https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilpatel/2015/01/16/90-of-startups-will-fail-heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-10/#78864c956679.

  • Pigou, A. C. (1938). The economics of welfare, 4th ed. London: Macmillan and Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H., Das, A., & Joseph, D. (2007). Country-level determinants of e-government maturity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 632–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3-21.

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In: J. G. March (ed.). Handbook of organizations, (pp. 142-193). Chicago: Rand McNally.

  • Tan, B., Ng, E., & Jiang, J. (2018). The process of technology leapfrogging: Case analysis of the national ICT infrastructure development journey of Azerbaijan. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of E-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDESA United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2014). United Nations e-government survey 2014: E-government for the future we want. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C, B., Gulati, G, J., Yates, D. J. (2013). Predictors of on-line services and e-participation: a cross-national comparison. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Quebec, pp. 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479752.

  • Williams, C. C., Martinez-Perez, A., & Kedir, A. (2016). Does bribery have a negative impact on firm performance? A firm-level analysis across 132 developing countries. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22(3), 398–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2013). Doing business 2014: Understanding regulations for small and medium-size enterprises, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9984-2.

  • Zikou, E., Varsakelis, N., & Sarri, A. K. (2018). Does public sector crowd out entrepreneurship? Evidence from the EU regions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(4), 866–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IFMR Graduate School of Business, Krea University, Sri City, Andhra Pradesh, 517 646, India

    Amit Das & Shobha S. Das

Authors
  1. Amit Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shobha S. Das
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Das.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, A., Das, S.S. E-Government and Entrepreneurship: Online Government Services and the Ease of Starting Business. Inf Syst Front 24, 1027–1039 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10121-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10121-z

Keywords

JEL Codes

Search

Navigation