Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An evidence-based scheme for web service selection

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing studies on the web service selection problem focus mainly on the functional QoS properties of the service rather than the consumer satisfaction and trust aspects. While a good QoS enhances the reputation of a service, different consumers invariably hold differing views of the service contents. Some service reputation approaches primarily consider the consumer’s prior experience of the service via opinion feedback system, may neglect the effect of social trust transition in the recommendations of others. As a result, the problem of reaching consensus on the level of consumer trust regarding service becomes one of key issues in service selection. This study proposes a trust-based service selection model to estimate the degree of consumer trust in a particular service based on the consumers’ direct experience and indirect recommendation of the service. In the proposed approach, the degree of consumer trust is correctly estimated by extending Dempster–Shafer evidence reasoning theory to the reputation computation using consumers’ direct experience and incorporating Jøsang’s belief model for solving the trust transition problem in the indirect recommendation of the service. The proposed model effectively enables deception detection by means of existing bodies of evidence, and therefore excludes the fraudulent evidence of malicious evaluators from the selection process. In addition, a quality index is proposed to help third party (TTP) examine the body of evidence and make the outranking result more reliable. Importantly, the quality index is based not only on the confidence degree of the evidence, but also on the support degree, and therefore discovers the effects of intentional negative assessments. The validity of the proposed approach is demonstrated numerically by means of two service selection examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chao KM, Younas M, Lo CC, Tan TH (2006) Fuzzy matchmaking for web services. In: Proceedings of 19 IEEE conference on advanced network and information applications (AINA 2006), pp 721–726

  2. D’Mello D, Ananthanarayana V (2010) Dynamic selection mechanism for quality of service aware web services. Enterp Inf Syst 4(1):23–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin WL, Lo CC, Chao KM, Younas M (2006) Fuzzy consensus on QoS in web services discovery. In: 20th International conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA 2006), pp 791–798

  4. Lin WL, Lo CC, Chao KM, Younas M (2008) Consumer-centric QoS-aware selection of web services. J Comput Syst Sci 74(2):211–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y, Ngu A, Zeng L (2004) QoS computation and policing in dynamic web service selection. In: 13th International conference on World Wide Web (WWW’04), New York, May 17–22, pp 65–73

  6. Ran S (2003) A model for web services discovery with QoS. ACM SIGecom Exch 4:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang P, Chao KM, Lo CC, Huang CL, Li Y (2006) A fuzzy model for selection of QoS-aware web services. In: IEEE international conference on e-business engineering (ICEBE ‘06), pp 585–593

  8. Wang P, Chao KM, Lo CC, Li Y (2008) QoS-aware service selection under consumer’s reputation. In: IEEE international conference on e-business engineering (ICEBE 2008), Oct 22–24, Shanghai, pp 627–632

  9. Wang P (2009) QoS-aware web services selection with intuitionistic fuzzy set under consumer’s vague perception. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):4460–4466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang P, Chao KM, Lo CC, Kuo PT (2009) A reputation scheme with witness reasoning for service selection. In: IEEE international conference on service-oriented computing and applications (SOCA’09), Taipei, Dec 14–15

  11. Zhou C, Chia LT, Lee BS (2005) Semantics in service discovery and QoS measurement. IT Prof 7:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Golbeck J (2008) Introduction to computing with social trust. In: Golbeck J (ed) Computing with social trust. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Billhardt H, Hermoso R, Ossowski S, Centeno R (2007) Trustbased service provider selection in open environments. In: The 22nd annual ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC2007), pp 1375–1380

  14. Dragoni N (2010) A survey on trust-based web service provision approaches. In: Third international conference on dependability, pp 83–91

  15. Galizia S, Gugliotta A, Domingue J (2007) A trust based methodology for web service selection. In: International conference on semantic computing (ICSC 2007), pp 193–200

  16. Jøsang A (1999) Trust-based decision making for electronic transactions. In: The 4th Nordic workshop. Secure IT systems (NORDSEC’99), Stockholm University Report 99-005, Stockholm

  17. Jøsang A, Ismail R, Boyd C (2007) A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis Support Syst 43(2):618–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klir G, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu B, Singh MP (2002) Distributed reputation management for electronic commerce. Comput Intell 18(4):535–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu B, Singh MP (2003) Detecting deception in reputation management. In: AAMAS ‘03. ACM Press, pp 73–80

  21. OWL Services Coalition (2004) OWL-S: semantic markup for web services, OWL-S v. 1.1, white paper. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.1/

  22. Sirin E, Parsia B, Hendler J (2004) Filtering and selecting semantic web services with interactive composition techniques. IEEE Intell Syst 19(4):42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenberg F, Michlmayr A, Dustdar S (2008) Top-down business process development and execution using quality of service aspects. Enterp Inf Syst 2(4):459–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ungera T, Mietznera R, Leymann F (2009) Customer-defined service level agreements for composite applications. Enterp Inf Syst 3(3):369–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tao A, Yang J (2008) Towards policy driven context aware differentiated services design and development. Enterp Inf Syst 2(4):367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Lessena T, Nitzschea J, Leymanna F (2009) Conversational web services: leveraging BPEL for expressing WSDL 2.0 message exchange patterns. Enterp Inf Syst 3(3):347–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Issaa H, Assia C, Debbabia M, Ray S (2009) QoS-aware middleware for web services composition: a qualitative approach. Enterp Inf Syst 3(4):449–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gong Z, Muyeba M, Guo J (2010) Business information query expansion through semantic network. Enterp Inf Syst 4(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang K, Bai X, Li J, Ding C (2010) A service-based framework for pharmacogenomics data integration. Enterp Inf Syst 4(3):225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cao X, Yang F (2011) Measuring the performance of internet companies using a two stage data envelopment analysis model. Enterp Inf Syst, 25 Jan 2011. doi:10.1080/17517575.2010.528039

  31. Li L, Warfield JN (2011) Perspectives on quality coordination and assurance in global supply Chain. Int J Prod Res 49(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu L (2011) Information architecture for supply chain quality management. Int J Prod Res 49(1):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chaudhry, PE, Chaudhry SS, Stumpf SA, Sudler H (2011) Piracy in cyber space: consumer complicity, pirates and enterprise enforcement. Enterp Inf Syst, 18 Feb 2011. doi:10.1080/17517575.2010.524942

  34. Marsh SP (1994) Formalising trust as a computational concept. PhD thesis, University of Stirling

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported jointly by TWISC@ NCKU and the National Science Council of Taiwan under Grant Nos. NSC100-2219-E-006-001 and NSC 99-2219-E-168-001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of MIS, Kun Shan University, Tainan, 710, Taiwan

    Ping Wang, Kuo-Ming Chao, Chi-Chun Lo & Ray Farmer

Authors
  1. Ping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuo-Ming Chao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chi-Chun Lo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ray Farmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, P., Chao, KM., Lo, CC. et al. An evidence-based scheme for web service selection. Inf Technol Manag 12, 161–172 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-011-0098-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-011-0098-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation