Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate productivity and the stages of ICT development

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of studies have considered the impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on corporate productivity, including the relationship of ICT to corporate structure and business processes. Comparatively less attention, however, has been directed toward the relationship between corporate productivity and the various stages of ICT application development; to date, the only work in this direction has been the proposal of some conceptual frameworks for the development stages of ICT, and no empirical studies have been conducted. In this paper, using individual data from the 2006 Information and Communication Technology Survey conducted by Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, we use estimated production functions to quantify how productivity changes with the stages of ICT development. When we classify ICT applications into four stages of sophistication—nonperforming ICT assets, section-wide system applications, company-wide system applications, and inter-corporate system applications—we find that the impact of ICT on productivity increases with each successive stage of sophistication. For instance, when we use a production function that assesses the impact of the ICT development stage on Total Factor Productivity (TFP), we find that companies that have developed company-wide system applications exhibit added-value productivity some 1.07-fold higher than companies that have only progressed as far as the development of section-wide system applications. We also find that companies that have developed inter-corporate system applications exhibit added-value productivity some 1.11-fold higher than companies with only company-wide system applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The word IT (Information Technology) which has the same meaning as ICT is used in the original paper. However, we use a term ICT throughout this paper.

  2. We have also confirmed that our analytical results are not significantly affected by applying GDP deflators to the values obtained for the added-value variable.

  3. Following Shinozaki [22], we set the software depreciation ratio at 20%.

  4. As the legal amortization period is 3 years for software for sales and research and development, but 5 years for other types of software, we assume in general that software is amortized over 4 years.

References

  1. Benbasat I, Dexter AS, Drury DH, Goldstein RC (1984) A critique of the stage hypothesis: theory and empirical evidence. Commun ACM 27(5):476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bresnahan TF, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1999) Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence, NBER working paper 7136

  3. Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Manag Sci 42(4):541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1998) Beyond the productivity paradox. Commun ACM 41(8):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: computers and organizational capital. Brookings Pap Econ Act 2002(1):137–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Economic Research Office, ICT Strategy Policy Bureau of Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (2003) Research on utilization of IT in business management. http://www.soumu.go.jp/johotsusintokei/linkdata/it_houkoku_h15.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2011 (in Japanese)

  7. Gibson CF, Nolan RL (1974) Managing the four stages of EDP growth. Harv Bus Rev 52(1):76–88

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hiromatsu T, Kobayashi M (2007) The analysis on the effects of ICT (information communication technology) capital assets in fiscal year 2001 or 2002. ESRI discussion paper series 175 (in Japanese)

  9. King JL, Kraemer KL (1984) Evolution and organizational information systems: An assessment of Nolan’s stage model. Commun ACM 27(5):466–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurokawa F (2006) The contributions of IT-related production factors in Japanese companies: the estimation of excess returns. ESRI discussion paper series 166 (in Japanese)

  11. Kurokawa F, Minetaki K (2006) How can IT raise productivity linked with workplace re-organization and human capital in Japan? EconAnal (Keizai Bunseki) 178 (in Japanese)

  12. Lehr B, Lichtenverg F (1999) Information technology and its impact on productivity: Firm-level evidence from government and private data sourced, 1977–1993. Can J Econ 32(2):335–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2006) IT management power index|ministry of economy, trade and industry IT management portal. http://www.meti.go.jp/policy/it_policy/it_keiei/about/idea/management.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2010 (in Japanese)

  14. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2010) Information and communication technology survey. http://www.meti.go.jp/statistics/zyo/zyouhou/index.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2010 (in Japanese)

  15. Minetaki K (2005) How can IT raise the productivity linked with workplace organization in Japan? ESRI discussion paper series 144 (in Japanese)

  16. Miyazaki S, Miyoshi H (2009) Assessment of IT stock level of Japanese enterprises. In: Shouzugawa Y, Miyoshi H (eds) Knowledge asset management and organizational performance. Hakuto-Shobo, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Motohashi K (2003) Experimental analysis of ICT innovation: how the performance of Japanese economy has changed. Toyo Keizai, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nolan RL (1979) Managing the crises in data processing. Harv Bus Rev 57(2):115–126

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nishimura K, Minetaki K (2004) Development of information technology and Japanese economy: beyond ‘phantom of new economy’. Yuhikaku, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Office of Director-General for Policy Planning, Cabinet Office (2004) Introduction of IT by enterprises and productivity. Policy effect analysis report (Seisaku Kouka Bunseki Report) 19 (in Japanese)

  21. Research Institute of Economic Planning Agency (2000) The effect of IT (information technology) on productivity: in search of Japan’s ‘new economy’. Policy effect analysis report (Seisaku Kouka Bunseki Report) 4 (in Japanese)

  22. Shinozaki A (2003) Economic effects of development of information technology: future of Japanese and US economies. Nippon Hyouronsha, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shinozaki A (2005) How does information technology pay off? Firm-level evidence in organizational structures and human resource management. ESRI discussion paper series 127 (in Japanese)

  24. Shouzugawa Y, Miyazaki S, Yamada Y, Miyoshi H (2009) Whether the knowledge asset management has the effect on the productivity: analysis by industry study data. In: Shouzugawa Y, Miyoshi H (eds) Knowledge asset management and organizational performance. Hakuto-Shobo, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Strassman PA (1990) The business value of computers. The Information Economics Press, New Canaan

    Google Scholar 

  26. Solow RM (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times, New York, p 36

  27. Takemura T (2008) Economic analysis of information and communication technology: experimental analysis using corporate level data. Taga Shuppan, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science, and Technology under a Strategic Research Foundation Grant-aided Project for Private Universities (S0991037). In addition, this study is also a portion of the research conducted under the “Strategy for Architecting a Local Innovation System Based on ICT Capabilities” program, funded by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (21530372).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Technology, Enterprise and Competitiveness (ITEC), Doshisha University, Karasuma Imadegawa, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan

    Satoru Miyazaki

  2. Faculty of Management, Otemon Gakuin University, 2-1-15, Nishiai, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan

    Hiroki Idota

  3. Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University, Karasuma Imadegawa, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan

    Hiroaki Miyoshi

Authors
  1. Satoru Miyazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroki Idota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hiroaki Miyoshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoru Miyazaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miyazaki, S., Idota, H. & Miyoshi, H. Corporate productivity and the stages of ICT development. Inf Technol Manag 13, 17–26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-011-0108-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-011-0108-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation