Skip to main content
Log in

Protein Alpha Shape (PAS) Dock: A new gaussian-based score function suitable for docking in homology modelled protein structures

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protein Alpha Shape (PAS) Dock is a new empirical score function suitable for virtual library screening using homology modelled protein structures. Here, the score function is used in combination with the geometry search method Tabu search. A description of the protein binding site is generated using gaussian property fields like in Protein Alpha Shape Similarity Analysis (PASSA). Gaussian property fields are also used to describe the ligand properties. The overlap between the receptor and ligand hydrophilicity and lipophilicity fields is maximised, while minimising steric clashes. Gaussian functions introduce a smoothing of the property fields. This makes the score function robust against small structural variations, and therefore suitable for use with homology models. This also makes it less critical to include protein flexibility in the docking calculations. We use a fast and simplified version of the score function in the geometry search, while a more detailed version is used for the final prediction of the binding free energies. This use of a two-level scoring makes PAS-Dock computationally efficient, and well suited for virtual screening. The PAS-Dock score function is trained on 218 X-ray structures of protein– ligand complexes with experimental binding affinities. The performance of PAS-Dock is compared to two other docking methods, AutoDock and MOE-Dock, with respect to both accuracy and computational efficiency. According to this study, PAS-Dock is more computationally efficient than both AutoDock and MOE-Dock, and gives a better prediction of the free energies of binding. PAS-Dock is also more robust against structural variations than AutoDock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baxter CA, Murray CW, Clark DE, Westhead DR, Eldridge MD (1998) Prot Struct Func Gen 33:367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R (2002) Prot Struct Func Gen 47:409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Böhm H-J, Stahl M, Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB (eds) (2002) Reviews in computational chemistry, The use of scoring functions in drug discovery applications. Wiley-VCH, New York, 18, pp 41–87

  4. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ (1998) J Comput Chem 19:1639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Case DA (1984) J Am Chem Soc 106:765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Massova I, Kollman PA (1999) J Am Chem Soc 121:8133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholls A, Honig B (1995) Science 268:1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearlman DA, Charifson PA (2001) J Med Chem 44:502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang R, Liu L, Lai L, Tang Y (1998) J Mol Model 4:379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelhaar DK, Verkhivker GM, Rejto PA, Sherman CJ, Fogel DB, Fogel LJ, Freer ST (1995) Chem Biol 2:317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gelhaar DK, Bouzida, D, Rejto PA, Parrill, L, Reddy, MR (eds) (1999) In Rational drug design: novel methodology and practical applications. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 292–311

  12. Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV, Mee RP (1997) J Comput Aided Mol Des 11:425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang R, Lai L, Wang S (2002) J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Muegge I, Martin YC (1999) J Med Chem 42:791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Muegge I (2000) Perspect Drug Discovery Des 20:99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Muegge I (2001) J Comput Chem 22:418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gohlke H, Hendlich M, Klebe G (2000) J Mol Biol 295:337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang R, Lu Y, Wang S (2003) J Med Chem 46:2287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wieman H, Tøndel K, Anderssen E, Drabløs F (2004) Mini-Rev Med Chem 4:793

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tøndel K, Anderssen E, Drabløs F (2002) J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T (1994) J Med Chem 37:4130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang J, Edelsbrunner H, Woodward C (1998) Protein Sci 7:1884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheridan RP, Bush BL (1993) J Chem Info Comp Sci 33:756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Molecular Operating Environment™ (2002) Version 2002.03, Chemical Computing Group, Inc.

  25. Rognan D, Lauemøller SL, Holm A, Buus S, Tschinke V (1999) J Med Chem 42:4650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G (1996) J Mol Biol 261:470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. The RCSB Protein Data Bank, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/

  28. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) Nucleic Acids Res 28:235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. The Unscrambler® (2000) Version 7.6 SR-1, CAMO ASA

  30. Halgren TA (1996) J Comp Chem 17:490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McGann MR, Almond HR, Nicholls A, Grant JA, Brown FK (2003) Biopolymers 68:76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schafferhans A, Klebe G (2001) J Mol Biol 307:407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Böhm H-J (1992) J Comput Aided Mol Des 6:593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Böhm H-J (1992) J Comput Aided Mol Des 6:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank The Norwegian Research Council for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Tøndel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tøndel, K., Anderssen, E. & Drabløs, F. Protein Alpha Shape (PAS) Dock: A new gaussian-based score function suitable for docking in homology modelled protein structures. J Comput Aided Mol Des 20, 131–144 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9041-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-006-9041-7

Keywords

Navigation