Skip to main content
Log in

Improving the accuracy of ultrafast ligand-based screening: incorporating lipophilicity into ElectroShape as an extra dimension

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a previous paper, we presented the ElectroShape method, which we used to achieve successful ligand-based virtual screening. It extended classical shape-based methods by applying them to the four-dimensional shape of the molecule where partial charge was used as the fourth dimension to capture electrostatic information. This paper extends the approach by using atomic lipophilicity (alogP) as an additional molecular property and validates it using the improved release 2 of the Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD). When alogP replaced partial charge, the enrichment results were slightly below those of ElectroShape, though still far better than purely shape-based methods. However, when alogP was added as a complement to partial charge, the resulting five-dimensional enrichments shows a clear improvement in performance. This demonstrates the utility of extending the ElectroShape virtual screening method by adding other atom-based descriptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong MS, Morris GM, Finn PW, Sharma R, Moretti L, Cooper RI, Richards WG (2010) Electroshape: fast molecular similarity calculations incorporating shape, chirality and electrostatics. J Comput Aided Mol Des 24(9):789–801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballester PJ, Finn PW, Richards WG (2009) Ultrafast shape recognition: evaluating a new ligand-based virtual screening technology. J Mol Graph Model 27:836–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ballester PJ, Richards WG (2007) Ultrafast shape recognition to search compound databases for similar molecular shapes. J Comput Chem 28:1711–1723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong MS, Morris GM, Finn PW, Sharma R, Richards WG (2009) Molecular similarity including chirality. J Mol Graph Model 28:368–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wildman SA, Crippen GM (1999) Prediction of physiochemical parameters by atomic contributions. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39:868–873

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, Canada, MOE 2008.10, http://www.chemcomp.com

  7. Huang N, Shoichet BK, Irwin JJ (2006) Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J Med Chem 49(23):6789–6801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Halgren TA (1996) The merck force field. J Comp Chem 17:490–641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dewar MJS, Zoebisch EG, Healy F, Stewart JJP (1985) AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. J Am Chem Soc 107(13):3902–3909. doi:10.1021/ja00299a024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Stuart Armstrong.

Additional information

This research was financed in part by the 6th Framework Program of the European Union (DeZnIT, Project Number 037303).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armstrong, M.S., Finn, P.W., Morris, G.M. et al. Improving the accuracy of ultrafast ligand-based screening: incorporating lipophilicity into ElectroShape as an extra dimension. J Comput Aided Mol Des 25, 785–790 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9463-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-011-9463-8

Keywords

Navigation