Skip to main content
Log in

The challenges of making decisions using uncertain data

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

All of the experimental compound data with which we work have significant uncertainties, due to imperfect correlations between experimental systems and the ultimate in vivo properties of compounds and the inherent variability in experimental conditions. When using these data to make decisions, it is essential that these uncertainties are taken into account to avoid making inappropriate decisions in the selection of compounds, which can lead to wasted effort and missed opportunities. In this paper we will consider approaches to rigorously account for uncertainties when selecting between compounds or assessing compounds against a property criterion; first for an individual measurement of a single property and then for multiple measurements of a property for the same compound. We will then explore how uncertainties in multiple properties can be combined when assessing compounds against a profile of criteria, a process known as multi-parameter optimisation. This guides rigorous decision-making using complex, uncertain data to focus on compounds with the best chance of success, while avoiding missed opportunities by inappropriately rejecting compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chadwick AT, Segall MD (2010) Overcoming psychological barriers to good discovery decisions. Drug Discov Today 15:561–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Segall MD (2012) Multi-parameter optimization: identifying high quality compounds with a balance of properties. Curr Pharm Des 18:1292–1310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rice J (2007) Mathematical statistics and data analysis, 3rd edn. Duxbury Press, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abad-Zapatero C, Metz JM (2005) Ligand efficiency indices as guideposts for drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 10:464–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hidalgo IJ, Raub TJ, Borchardt RT (1989) Characterization of the human colon carcinoma cell line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability. Gastroenterology 96:736–749

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Irvine JD, Takahashi L, Lockhart K, Cheong J, Tolan JW, Selick HE, Grove JR (1999) MDCK (Madin–Darby canine kidney) cells: a tool for membrane permeability screening. J Pharm Sci 88:28–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrington EC (1965) The desirability function. Ind Qual Control 21:494–498

    Google Scholar 

  9. Segall MD (2014) Advances in multiparameter optimization methods for de novo drug design. Expert Opin Drug Discov 9:803–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Segall MD, Beresford AP, Gola JMR, Hawksley D, Tarbit MH (2006) Focus on Success: using in silico optimisation to achieve an optimal balance of properties. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2:325–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Segall MD, Chadwick A (2010) Making priors a priority. J Comput Aided Mol Des 24:957–960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaynes ET (2003) Probability theory: the logic of science: principles and elementary applications, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew D. Segall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Segall, M.D., Champness, E.J. The challenges of making decisions using uncertain data. J Comput Aided Mol Des 29, 809–816 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-015-9855-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-015-9855-2

Keywords

Navigation