Abstract
The extraction of the direction of motion from the time varying retinal images is one of the most basic tasks any visual system is confronted with. However, retinal images are severely corrupted by photon noise, in particular at low light levels, thus limiting the performance of motion detection mechanisms of what sort so ever. Here, we study how photon noise propagates through an array of Reichardt-type motion detectors that are commonly believed to underlie fly motion vision. We provide closed-form analytical expressions of the signal and noise spectra at the output of such a motion detector array. We find that Reichardt detectors reveal favorable noise suppression in the frequency range where most of the signal power resides. Most notably, due to inherent adaptive properties, the transmitted information about stimulus velocity remains nearly constant over a large range of velocity entropies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abshire PA, Andreou AG (2001) A communication channel model for information transmission in the blowfly photoreceptor. Biosystems 62:113–133.
Borst A (2003) Noise, not stimulus entropy, determines neural information rate. J. Comput. Neurosci. 14:23–31.
Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1989) Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci. 12:297–306.
Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1993) Detecting visual motion: Theory and models. In: FA Miles, J Wallman, eds. Visual Motion and its Role in the Stabilization of Gaze. Elsevier, Amsterdam, London, New York, Tokyo, pp. 3–27.
Borst A, Reisenman C, Haag J (2003) Adaptation of response transients in fly motion vision II: Model studies. Vision. Res. 43:1311–1324.
Borst A, Flanagin V, Sompolinsky H (2005) Adaptation without parameter change: Dynamic gain control in motion detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6172–6176.
Buchner E (1976) Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol. Cybern. 24:85–101.
Cover TM, Thomas JA (1991) Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore.
de Ruyter van Steveninck R, Bialek W (1995) Reliability and statistical efficiency of a blowfly movement- sensitive neuron. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 348:321–340.
Fennema CL, Thompson WB (1979) Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects. Comp. Graph. Im. Process. 9:301–315.
Götz KG (1964) Optomotorische Untersuchungen des visuellen Systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. Kybernetik 2:77–92.
Grewe J, Kretzberg J, Warzecha AK, Egelhaaf M (2003) Impact of photon noise on the reliability of a motion-sensitive neuron in the fly’s visual system. J. Neurosci. 23:10776–10783.
Haag J, Borst A (1997) Encoding of visual motion information and reliability in spiking and graded potential neurons. J. Neurosci. 17:4809–4819.
Haag J, Borst A (1998) Active membrane characteristics and signal encoding in graded potential neurons. J. Neurosci. 18:7972–7986.
Haag J, Denk W, Borst A (2004) Fly motion vision is based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:16333–16338.
van Hateren JH (1992) Real and optimal neural images in early vision. Nature 360:68–70.
Hildreth EC, Koch C (1987) The analysis of motion: From computational theory to neuronal mechanisms. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 10:477–533.
Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1990) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, 1952. Bull. Math. Biol. 52:25–71.
Howard J, Blakeslee B, Laughlin SB (1987) The intracellular pupil mechanism and the maintenance of photoreceptor signal to noise ratios in the blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Proc. R. Soc. B 231:415–435.
Laughlin SB (1987) Form and function in retinal processing. Trends Neurosci. 10:478–483.
Laughlin SB (1996) Matched filtering by a photoreceptor membrane. Vision. Res. 36:1529–1541.
Lewen GD, Bialek W, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR (2001) Neural coding of naturalistic motion stimuli. Network 12:317–329.
Limb JO, Murphy JA (1975) Estimating the velocity of moving images in television signals. Comp. Graph. Im. Process. 4:311–327.
Mircea A, Sinnreich H (1969) Distortion noise in frequency-dependent nonlinear networks. Proc. Inst. Electron. Engrs. 115:1644–1648.
Papoulis A (1991) The Power Spectrum. In: Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill, pp. 319–329.
Petrowitz R, Dahmen H, Egelhaaf M, Krapp HG (2000) Arrangement of optical axes and spatial resolution in the compound eye of the female blowfly Calliphora. J. Comp. Physiol. 168:737–746.
Potters M, Bialek W (1994) Statistical mechanics and visual signal processing. J. Physiol. France 4:1755–1775.
Reichardt W (1961) Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In: WA, Rosenblith, ed. Sensory Communication. The MIT Press and John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, pp. 303–317.
Reichardt W (1987) Evaluation of optical motion information by movement detectors. J. Comp. Physiol. A 161:533–547.
Reisenman C, Haag J, Borst A (2003) Adaptation of response transients in fly motion vision I: Experiments. Vision. Res. 43:1293–1309.
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Chicago.
Schuling FH, Altena P, Mastebroek HAK (1990) The computational measurement of apparent motion: A recurrent pattern recognition strategy as an approach to solve the correspondence problem. Biol. Cybern. 62:463–473.
Skoczenski AM, Norcia AM (1998) Neural noise limitations on infant visual sensitivity. Nature 391:697–700.
Srinivasan MV (1990) Generalized gradient schemes for measurement of image motion. Biol. Cybern. 63:421–431.
Tolhurst DJ, Movshon JA, Dean AF (1983) The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex. Vision. Res. 23:775–785.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Action editor: Matthew Wiener
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, L., Borst, A. Propagation of photon noise and information transfer in visual motion detection. J Comput Neurosci 20, 167–178 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-005-5906-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-005-5906-3