Abstract
This article presents a technique that enables online testing of sensors through the superposition of the test stimulus onto the measurand. Perturbations due to the surrounding environment can very often introduce fluctuations in the test output creating a major concern for this type of sensor testing. In this paper, a signal processing technique is proposed where the test stimulus is encoded by a pseudo-random sequence in order to reduce the test output fluctuations. The trade-off between the level of rejection of a perturbation and the overall test time is studied. In the case of the MEMS accelerometer considered in this paper, it is theoretically demonstrated that the rejection is more than 20 dB for a test time of 2.55 s. Furthermore, excessively strong perturbations can be monitored so that the test status is updated only if the accuracy of the test signal permits so. The technique has been implemented on a demonstration board and validated on a vibration platform.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen HV, Terry SC, de Bruin DW (1989) Self-testable accelerometer systems. Proceedings of IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems Workshop, 1989, 20–22, p 113–115, Feb
Camargo JB Jr, Canzian E, Ameida JR Jr, Paz SM, Basseto BA (2001) Quantitative analysis methodology in safety-critical microprocessor applications. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74:53–62 doi:10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00061-8
Deb N, Blanton RD (2006) Built-in self-test of MEMS accelerometers. J Microelectromechanical Syst 15(1):52–68 Feb
Documentation on ADXL accelerometers available at: http://www.analog.com/en/
Irvine T. An introduction to random vibration. Revision B. http://www.vibrationdata.com/tutorials2/random.pdf
Jeffrey C, Rosing R, Richardson A (2000) A Built-in Test Solution for a SMART Silicon Micromachined Resonant Pressure Sensor. Proceedings of IEEE European Test Workshop (ETW), Portugal, Cascais, May
Jeffrey C, Bunyan RJT, Combes D, King DO, Richardson AMD (2005) Design considerations for on-line testing of a capacitive accelerometer. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Mixed-Signal Testing Workshop (IMSTW’05), Cannes, France, pp 220–223
Jeffrey C, Dumas N et al (2007) Sensor testing through bias superposition. Sens Actuators, A, Phys 136:441–455 May doi:10.1016/j.sna.2006.11.030
Pickholtz RL, Schilling DL, Milstein LB (1982) Theory of spread-spectrum communications-a tutorial. IEEE Trans Commun 30(5), May
Rufer L, Mir S, Simeu E, Domingues C (2005) On-chip pseudorandom MEMS testing. J Electron Test: Theory and Appl (JETTA) 21(3):233–241 June
Zepernick H-J, Finger A (2001) Pseudo random signal processing-theory and application. Wiley, New York
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr Carl Jeffrey for providing the experimental data of section 3.3. This work has been supported by the European FP6 Network of Excellence in Design for Micro & Nano Manufacture (PATENT-DfMM) and the EPSRC Innovative Electronics manufacturing Research Centre (IeMRC) in the UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: C. Landrault
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dumas, N., Xu, Z., Georgopoulos, K. et al. Online Testing of MEMS Based on Encoded Stimulus Superposition. J Electron Test 24, 555–566 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-008-5090-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-008-5090-2