Skip to main content
Log in

Enabling Remote Testing: Embedded Test Controller and Mixed-signal Test Architecture

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Remote testing requires embedded test infrastructure, consisting of communication, test control and test access. This article presents an embedded test solution for a low-frequency audio board. Supporting analog testing, the solution consists of a measurement and calculation method for passive component characterization, analog test bus solution and an embedded test controller for controlling embedded tests and providing test stimuli. Moreover, the solution, which supports the presented test plan, was compared to a test plan supporting traditional testing. It was found that the embedded test solution provided a 29% test coverage of the audio board components and substituted flying probe testing included in the traditional test plan. Besides such benefits as improved fault diagnostics and lower manufacturing costs, the paper also discusses the drawbacks of the presented solution, including reduced measurement accuracy. This paper also presents a correction to a previously presented passive component measurement and calculation method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiang C-H, Wheatley PJ, Ho KY, Cheung KL (2004) Testing and remote field update of distributed base stations in a wireless network. Proc Int Test Conf 711–718

  2. Cristaldi L, Ferrero A, Monti A, Ponci F, McKay W, Dougal R (2005) A virtual environment for remote testing of complex systems. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 54:123–133. doi:10.1109/TIM.2004.834067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Capitani di Vimercati S, Ferrero A, Lazzaroni M (2006) Mobile agent technology for remote measurements. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 55:1559–1565. doi:10.1109/TIM.2006.880941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dejanovic S, Persson U, Kuttainen S, Westerfur L (2005) Measurement of electrical parameters using mixed-signal test bus, IEEE Std. 1149.4. Meas 37(3):260–277. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2004.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. EN 60384-22:2004, Fixed capacitors for use in electronic equipment. Part 22: Sectional specification: Fixed surface mount multilayer capacitors of ceramic dielectric, Class 2

  6. Hannu J, Moilanen M (2007) Methods of testing discrete semiconductors in the 1149.4 environment. J Elect Test Theory App 23(6):581–592. doi:10.1007/s10836-007-5007-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hannu J, Happonen T, Moilanen M (2007) Embedded test controller for board and system level remote testing. Proc Int Mix Signals Test Workshop 88–92

  8. Happonen T, Sankala J, Hekkala V, Koivukangas T, Moilanen M (2007) Work in progress: universally applicable test communication standard to enable life-cycle testing of modern electronic devices. Proc Conf Test Commun Syst 10–13

  9. IEEE Std 1149.4-1999 (2000) Standard for a mixed-signal test bus. IEEE, Piscataway

  10. Knivett V (2008) Beyond the boundary. New Electr 41(17):53–54

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miu K, Ajjarapu V, Butler-Purry K, Niebur D, Nwankpa C, Schulz N, Stankovic A (2005) Testing of shipboard power systems: A case for remote testing and measurement. IEEE Electr Ship Technol Symp 195–201. doi:10.1109/ESTS.2005.1524674

  12. Ong NS, Lim LEN (1993) Activity-based cost-modelling procedures for PCB assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 8:396–406. doi:10.1007/BF01751101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reis I, Collins P, van Houcke M (2006) On-line boundary-scan testing in service of extended products. Proc Int Test Conf 1–10. doi:10.1109/TEST.2006.297745

  14. Saikkonen T, Moilanen M (2007) Component value calculations and characterizations for measurements in the IEEE 1149.4 environment. J Elect Test Theory Appl 23(6):569–579. doi:10.1007/s10836-007-5008-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scheiber SF (2001) Building a successful board-test strategy. Newnes, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sundar S, Kim BC, Byrd T, Toledo F, Wokhlu S, Beskar E, Rousselin R, Cotton D, Kendall G (2007) Low cost automatic mixed-signal board test using IEEE 1149.4. Proc Int Test Conf 1–9. doi:10.1109/TEST.2007.4437629

  17. Ungar LY (2006) An economics model of supportability through design for testability. Proc Autotestcon. doi:10.1109/AUTEST.2006.283603

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES), Nokia, Nokia Siemens Networks and Polar Electro for funding the Remote Access Testing Platform project under this work was carried out.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jari Hannu.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: K.-T. Cheng

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hannu, J., Saikkonen, T., Häkkinen, J. et al. Enabling Remote Testing: Embedded Test Controller and Mixed-signal Test Architecture. J Electron Test 26, 641–658 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-010-5175-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-010-5175-6

Keywords

Navigation