Skip to main content
Log in

Resistive Bridging Defect Detection in Bulk, FDSOI and FinFET Technologies

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fully Depleted Silicon on Insulator (FDSOI) and Fin Field Effect Transistor (FinFET) are likely alternatives to traditional planar Bulk transistors for future technologies due to their respective promising ways of tackling the scalability issues with better short channel characteristics. Both these technologies are aiming in particular at regaining a better electrostatic control by the gate over the channel of the transistor. However, FDSOI is a planar MOS technology and as a result it is much more in continuity with planar Bulk as compared to the vertical FinFET transistors. The competition between these two technologies is fierce and many studies have been reported in the literature to compare these technologies in terms of speed performance, power consumption, cost, etc. However, these studies have not yet focused on their testability properties while the impact of defects on circuits implemented in FDSOI and FinFET technologies might be significantly different from the impact of similar defects in planar MOS circuit. It is therefore the objective of the paper to address this aspect. More specifically, we analyze the electrical behavior of logic gates in presence of a resistive bridging defect for these three different technologies. A particular care has been taken to design transistors and elementary gates in such a way that the comparative analysis in different technologies is meaningful. After implementing similar design in each technology, we compare the electrical behavior of the circuit with the same resistive bridging defect and we analyze both the static and dynamic impact of this defect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitken R (2015) Designing SoCs with planar fully depleted devices and FinFETs. Keynote speech-International Electron Device Meeting, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alioto M (2010) Analysis of layout density in FinFET standard cells and impact of fin technology. IEEE international Symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS’10), pp 3204-3207

  3. M. Alioto, Comparative Evaluation of Layout Density in 3T, 4T, and MT FinFET Standard Cells. In IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 19(5):751–762, 2011

  4. Bhattacharya D et al (2014) FinFETs: from devices to architectures. Advances in Electronics, ID 365689:21

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang L et al (2003) Extremely scaled silicon nano-CMOS devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE 91(11):1860–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colinge J-P (2008) FinFET and other multi-gate transistor. Springer

  7. Dunga M et al (2008) BSIM-CMG: a compact model for multi-gate transistors. Springers US

    Google Scholar 

  8. Engelke P et al (2008) On detection of resistive bridging defects by low-temperature and low-voltage testing. In IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 27(2):327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fenouillet-Beranger C et al (2004) Requirements for ultra-thin-film devices and new materials for the CMOS roadmap. Solid State Electron 48:961–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwai H (2008) CMOS technology after reaching the scale limit. 8th international workshop on junction technology IWJT, pp 1-2

  11. Jurczak M et al (2009) Review of FINFET technology. IEEE international SOI Conference, pp 1-4

  12. Karel A et al (2016) Comparative study of bulk, FDSOI and FinFET technologies in presence of a resistive short defect. 17th Latin-American test Symposium (LATS’16), Foz do Iguacu, pp 129-134

  13. King T-J (2005) FinFETs for nanoscale CMOS digital integrated circuits. IEEE/ACM international Conference on Computer-aided design (ICCAD’05), pp 207-210

  14. Kruseman B et al (2003) Detection of resistive shorts in deep-submicron technologies. IEEE international test Conference, pp 866-875

  15. Nowak EJ et al (2004) Turning silicon on its edge [double gate CMOS/FinFET technology]. IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine 20(1):20–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Philippe M et al (2013) UTBB FD-SOI: a process/design symbiosis for breakthrough energy-efficiency. Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE’13), pp 952-957

  17. Planes N et al (2012) 28nm FDSOI technology platform for high-speed low-voltage digital applications. Symposium on VLSI technology (VLSIT’12), pp 133-134

  18. Polian I et al (2005) Resistive bridge fault model evolution from conventional to ultra deep submicron. 23rd IEEE VLSI test Symposium (VTS'05), pp 343-348

  19. Renovell M et al (1995) The concept of resistance interval: a new parametric model for realistic resistive bridging fault. IEEE VLSI test Symposium (VTS'95), pp 184-189

  20. Sinha S et al (2012) Exploring sub-20nm FinFET design with predictive technology models. Annual design Automation Conference (DAC '12). ACM, New York

  21. Skotnicki T et al (2005) New materials and device architectures for the end-of-roadmap CMOS nodes. Mater Sci Eng B 124–125:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Takayasu S et al (2006) Fully-depleted SOI CMOS circuits and technology for ultra-low power aaplication. Springer

  23. Tayade R et al (2007) Small-delay defect detection in the presence of process variations. 8th international Symposium on quality electronic design (ISQED'07). San Jose, pp 711-716

  24. Villacorta H et al (2012) Resistive bridge defect detection enhancement under parameter variations combining low VDD and body bias in a delay based test. In Microelectronics Reliability 52(11):2799–2804

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Karel.

Ethics declarations

Grant Support

This work was supported by the Laboratory of Informatics, Robotics and Microelectronics of Montpellier (LIRMM) and University of Montpellier for PhD Graduates.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: A. D. Singh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karel, A., Comte, M., Galliere, JM. et al. Resistive Bridging Defect Detection in Bulk, FDSOI and FinFET Technologies. J Electron Test 33, 515–527 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-017-5674-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-017-5674-9

Keywords

Navigation