Skip to main content
Log in

Connectivity Test for System in Package Interconnects

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

System in package (SiP) has become a major trend for state-of-the-art devices in semiconductor industry. The decreasing dimension of its redistribution layers (RDLs) makes defective connection more prone to occur but harder to detect. This study proposes new metrology ideas verified experimentally to guarantee the SiP RDL connectivity. The major challenges are testability of <500 Ω open on a trace and especially highly resistive paths between RDL traces that can develop into serious short-circuits over time. Inspection of the RDLs after packaging cannot use the same techniques as used in probing bare printed circuit boards due to the danger of damaging embedded parts. This manuscript provides solutions that can guarantee the same level of quality assurance in the open and the short inspection as conventional test methods can. These techniques enable accurate probing of as small as 50 Ω for open defects and up to 100 MΩ for short defects using only 0.2 V, which is ~1000 times smaller signal than what is used in the conventional high-voltage technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braun T, Töpper M, Becker KF, Wilke M, Huhn M, Maass U, Ndip I, Aschenbrenner R, Lang KD (2016) Opportunities of fan-out wafer level packaging (FOWLP) for RF applications. Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems (SiRF), Austin, pp 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garrou P, Huffman P (2011) RDL: an integral part of today’s advanced packaging technologies. Solid State Technology 54:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gizopoulos D (2006) Advances in electronic testing: challenges and methodologies. Springer

  4. IPC-6012D (2015) Qualification and performance specification for rigid printed boards, Association connecting electronics industries, Apendix A

  5. Lau JH, Tzeng PJ, Lee C, Zhan C, Li M, Cline J, Saito K, Hsin Y, Chang P, Chang YH, Chen J, Chen S, Wu C, Chang H, Chien C, Lin C, Ku TK, Lo R, Kao M (2014) Redistribution layers (RDLs) for 2.5D,/3D IC integration. Journal of Microelectronics and Electronic Packaging (IMAPS) 11:16–24

  6. Lee HS, Chakrabarty K (2009) Test challenges for 3D integrated circuits. IEEE Des Test Comput 26:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng Y, Petranovic D, Lim SK (2017) Chip/package co-analysis and inductance extraction for fan-out wafer-level-packaging. Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems (EPEPS), San Jose, pp 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rao VS, Chong CT, Ho D, Zhi DM, Choong CS, PS SM, Ismael D, Liang YY (2016) Development of High Density Fan Out Wafer Level Package (HD FOWLP) with Multi-layer Fine Pitch RDL for Mobile Applications. 2016 Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), Las Vegas, pp 522–1529

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yi P, Xiao K, Ding K, Dong C, Li X (2017) Electrochemical migration behavior of copper-clad laminate and electroless nickel/immersion gold printed circuit boards under thin electrolyte layers. Materials 10:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JungHo Kang.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: D. Gizopoulos

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, J., Chae, K. & Jeong, J. Connectivity Test for System in Package Interconnects. J Electron Test 35, 559–565 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-019-05810-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-019-05810-2

Keywords

Navigation