Abstract
Although card-based control systems, such as Kanban and CONWIP, for production processes have been successfully employed, the design discipline does not seem to be clear yet. Therefore, the superiority of one control over the other is controversial. This paper proposes a novel design discipline for card-based control of production processes, by developing the theory of token transaction systems. The theory shows how the three indices represented in Little’s law are decided by the structure of a production process with control cards and deployment of work-in-process (WIP). That is, the relation of WIP, cycle time and throughput on specific sub-network of a production process is clarified. We show how Little’s law should be used in the design of card-based production control systems. As an application of the theory, we resolve complicated result of comparison between Kanban and CONWIP. In doing so, this theory does not restrict the target of analysis to serial production lines, but any shaped processes can be analyzed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alfieri, A., & Matta, A. (2010). Mathematical programming representation of pull controlled single-product serial manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. Published online January 2010. doi:10.1007/s10845-009-0371-x.
Baccelli F. L., Cohen G., Olsder G. J., Quadrat J. P. (1992) Synchronization and Linearity – An algebra for discrete event systems. Wiley, New York
Bonvik, A. M., & Gershwin, S. B. (1996). Beyond Kanban: Creating and analyzing lean shop floor control policies. Manufacturing and service operations management conference proceeding, Durtmouth College, The Amos Tuck School, Hannover, New Hampshire, pp. 46–51.
Bonvik A. M., Couch C. E., Gershwin S. B. (1997) A comparison of production-line control mechanisms. International Journal of Production Research 35(3): 789–804
Framinan J. M., Gonzalez P. L., Ruiz-Usano R. (2003) The CONWIP production control system: Review and research issues. Production Planning and Control 14: 255–265
Gaury E. G. A., Pierreval H., Kleijnen J. P. C. (2000) An evolutionary approach to select a pull system among Kanban, Conwip and Hybrid. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 11(2): 157–167
Ghrayeb O., Phojanamongkolkij N., Tan B. A. (2009) A hybrid push/pull system in assemble-to-order manufacturing environment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 20(4): 379–387
Gstettner S., Kuhn H. (1996) Analysis of production control systems kanban and CONWIP. International Journal of Production Research 34(11): 3253–3274
Hopp W. J., Spearman M. L. (2008) Factory physics: Foundations of manufacturing management. (3rd ed.)McGraw-Hill, Irwin
Khojasteh-Ghamari, Y. (2009a). An integrated framework for pull production control systems. PhD thesis. University of Tsukuba, Japan.
Khojasteh-Ghamari Y. (2009b) A performance comparison between Kanban and CONWIP controlled assembly systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 20(6): 751–760
Khojasteh-Ghamari, Y. (2010). Developing a framework for performance analysis of a production process controlled by Kanban and CONWIP. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. Published online October 2009. doi:10.1007/s10845-009-0338-y.
Khojasteh-Ghamari, Y., & Sato, R. (2010). Managing an assembly production process with a proper control policy. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management. (forthcoming).
Little J. D. C. (1961) A proof for the queuing formula: L = λ W. Operations Research 9: 383–387
Mesarovic M. D., Takahara Y. (1975) Mathematical foundation of general systems theory. Academic Press, New York
Monden Y. (1998) Toyota production system: An integrated approach to just-in-time (3rd ed.). Engineering & Management Press, Norcross
Muckstadt J. A., Tayur S. R. (1995) A comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms: I, background and structural results. IIE Transactions 27(1): 140–150
Murata, T. (1992). Analysis and application of Petri nets. Kindai Kagakusha. (in Japanese)
Paternina-Arboleda C. D., Das T. K. (2001) Intelligent dynamic control policies for serial production lines. IIE Transactions 33(1): 65–77
Sato, R., & Kawai, A. (2007). Organizing a business process that realizes required throughput: the principle and an application to information systems for SCM. Department of Social Systems and Management, Discussion Paper Series No.1184, University of Tsukuba.
Sato R., Praehofer H. (1997) A discrete event model of business system - A Systems Theoretic for Information Systems Analysis: Part 1. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 27: 1–10
Sato R. (2001) Realization theory of discrete-event systems and its application to the uniqueness and universality of DEVS formalism. International Journal of General Systems 30(5): 513–549
Spearman M. L., Zazanis M. A. (1992) Push and pull production systems: issues and comparisons. Operations Research 40: 521–532
Spearman M. L., Woodruff D. L., Hopp W. J. (1990) CONWIP: A pull alternative to Kanban. International Journal of Production Research 23: 879–894
Takahashi K. Myreshka, Hirotani D. (2005) Comparing CONWIP, synchronized CONWIP, and Kanban in complex supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics 93–94: 25–40
Yang K. K. (2000) Managing a flow line with single-Kanban, dual-Kanban or CONWIP. Production and Operations Management 9(4): 349–366
Zeigler B. P. (1976) Theory of modelling and simulation. Wiley, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, R., Khojasteh-Ghamari, Y. An integrated framework for card-based production control systems. J Intell Manuf 23, 717–731 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0421-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-010-0421-4