Abstract
There are many studies on the application examples and the definitions of the super-matrix in the Analytic Network Process (ANP). The ANP applies network structures with the alternatives and the criteria to clarify a complex decision-making. It is important to obtain the consent from both the criteria and the alternatives because the evaluation is relative and reciprocal. In addition, there are very few studies on the interaction between the criteria and the alternatives. There is no realistic interpretation of the maximum eigenvalue in the ANP and the negative elements of the criteria matrix. Based on our study, the evaluation with only the alternatives consists of the missing values or the non-square matrix, it is not easy to make. The ANP that contains these irregular alternatives is defined as “Minor ANP”. Then, we describe these methods of making the priority of only the alternative’s matrix values by using the ANP. This study has proven that the missing values in the alternative matrix can be replaced by zeros such that the criteria matrix can be derived without using the inverse alternative matrix. Then, the priority of alternative selection can be obtained through the calculation of eigenvector. An empirical case of the best selection of supplier illustrates our proposed methods for applying to the manufacturing industry. The result reveals the methods can be well adopted in the real world.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Choi T.Y., Hartley J.L. (1996) An exploration of supplier selection practices across the supply Chain. Journal of Operations Management 14(4): 333–343
Ghodsypour S.H., O’Brien C. (1998) A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics 56-57: 199–212
Ghodsypour S.H., O’Brien C. (2001) The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint. International Journal of Production Economics 73(1): 15–27
Harker P.T. (1987) Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarch process. Mathematical Modelling 9(11): 837–848
Harker P.T. (1987) Derivatives of the Perron root of a positive reciprocal matrix: With application to the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics and Computation 22(2/3): 217–232
Harker P.T., Vargas L.G. (1987) The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 33(11): 1383–1403
Kahraman C., Cebeci U., Ulukan Z. (2003) Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management 16(6): 382–394
Kinoshita E., Nakanishi M. (1999) Proposal of new AHP model in light of dominant relationship among alternatives. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 42(2): 180–197
Kinoshita E., Sekitani K., Shi J. (2002) Mathematical properties of dominant AHP and concurrent convergence method. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 45(2): 198–213
Kinoshita E., Sugiura S. (2008) A comparison of dominant AHP and similar dominant models. Journal of Research Institute of Meijo University 7: 113–116
Nishizawa K. (2005) Estimation of unknown comparisons in incomplete AHP. Report of the Research Institute of Industrial Technology, Nihon University 77: 1–9
Nishizawa K. (2007) Simple AHP based on three-level evaluation and two-cluster ANP for the decision makers. Journal of Japanese Symposium on The Analytic Hierachy Process of the Operations Research Society of Japan 1: 97–104
Nydick R.L., Hill R.P. (1992) Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 28(2): 31–36
Ozaki, T., Sugiura, S., Kinoshita, E., Tzeng, G.H. (2009). Dissolution of the dilemma or circulation problem using the Analytic Network Process. Proceedings of the 10 th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2009, Pittsburgh.
Saaty T.L. (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty T.L. (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
Spekman R.E. (1988) Strategic supplier selection: Understanding long-term Buyer relationships. Business Horizons 31(4): 75–81
Sugiura S., Kinoshita E. (2005) Solution of circular logic by concurrent convergence method of evaluating value. Urban Science Studies of Meijo University 10: 115–121
Sugiura S., Kinoshita E. (2007) A dissolution of circular logic on social choice. Journal of Japanese Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process of the Operations Research Society of Japan 1: 75–83
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ozaki, T., Lo, MC., Kinoshita, E. et al. Decision-making for the best selection of suppliers by using minor ANP. J Intell Manuf 23, 2171–2178 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0563-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0563-z