Skip to main content
Log in

Developing a decision support system for improving sustainability performance of manufacturing processes

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is difficult to formulate and solve optimization problems for sustainability performance in manufacturing. The main reasons for this are: (1) optimization problems are typically complex and involve manufacturing and sustainability aspects, (2) these problems require diversity of manufacturing data, (3) optimization modeling and solving tasks require specialized expertise and programming skills, (4) the use of a different optimization application requires re-modeling of optimization problems even for the same problem, and (5) these optimization models are not decomposed nor reusable. This paper presents the development of a decision support system (DSS) that enables manufacturers to formulate optimization problems at multiple manufacturing levels, to represent various manufacturing data, to create compatible and reusable models and to derive easily optimal solutions for improving sustainability performance. We have implemented a DSS prototype system and applied this system to two case studies. The case studies demonstrate how to allocate resources at the production level and how to select process parameters at the unit-process level to achieve minimal energy consumption. The research of this paper will help reduce time and effort for enhancing sustainability performance without heavily relying on optimization expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, A., Singh, H., Kumar, P., & Singh, M. (2008). Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi’s technique—A comparative analysis. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 200, 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, M., Ciurana, J., Rodriguez, C., & Ozel, T. (2011). Design of a decision support system for machine tool selection based on machine characteristics and performance tests. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22, 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AMT. (2011). MTConnect standard part 1—Overview and protocol. The Association for Manufacturing Technology. http://www.mtconnect.org/. Accessed Feb 2014.

  • Arslan, M., Catay, B., & Budak, E. (2004). A decision support system for machine tool selection. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(1), 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaia, O., Dolgui, A., Guschinsky, N., & Levin, G. (2012). A decision support system for design of mass production machining lines composed of stations with rotary or mobile table. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 28, 672–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan, R. (2013). Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 242–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biegler, L. (2010). Nonlinear programming: Concepts, algorithms, and applications to chemical processes (Vol. 10). SIAM-Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

  • Brodsky, A., Shao, G., & Riddick, F. (2014). Process analytics formalism for decision guidance in sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0892-9.

  • Clausen, J. (1999). Branch and bound algorithms—Principles and examples. University of Copenhagen. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.5.7475&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2014

  • Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008). MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51(1), 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, N., Helu, M., & Dornfeld, D. (2010). Design and operation strategies for green machine tool development. In Proceedings of MTTRF 2010 annual meeting.

  • Diaz, N., & Dornfeld, D. (2012). Cost and energy consumption optimization of product manufacture in a flexible manufacturing system. In Proceedings of the 19th CIRP conference on life cycle engineering (pp. 411–416).

  • Dimopoulos, C., & Zalzala, A. (2000). Recent developments in evolutionary computation for manufacturing optimization: Problems, solutions, and comparisons. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 4(2), 93–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euzenat, J., & Shvaiko, P. (2007). Ontology mapping. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, K., Uhan, N., Zhao, F., & Sutherland, J. (2013). Flow shop scheduling with peak power consumption constraints. Annals of Operations Research, 206(1), 115–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., Althaus, H. J., Doka, G., Dones, R., Hischier, R., Hellweg, S., Nemecek, T., Rebitzer, G., & Spielmann, M. (2007). Eco-Invent: Overview and methodology. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. http://www.ecoinvent.org/fileadmin/documents/en/01_OverviewAndMethodology.pdf. Accessed Dec 2013.

  • Giachetti, R. (1998). A decision support system for material and manufacturing process selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9, 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafi, I., Khamlichi, A., Cabrera, F., & Almansa, E. (2012). Optimization of cutting conditions for sustainable machining of PEEK-CF30 using TiN tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM. (2012). Introducing IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio V12.2. IBM. http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/cosinfoc/v12r2/index.jsp?topic=%2Filog.odms.ide.help%2FContent%2FOptimization%2FDocumentation%2FOPL_Studio%2F_pubskel%2Fglobals%2Feclipse_and_xplatform%2Fps_opl307.html. Accessed Aug 2013.

  • Iqbal, A., Zhang, H., Kong, L., & Hussain, G. (2014). A rule-based system for trade-off among energy consumption, tool life and productivity in machining process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0851-x.

  • Jia, S., Tang, R., & Lv, J. (2014). Machining activity extraction and energy attributes inheritance method to support intelligent energy estimation of machining process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0894-7.

  • Joung, C., Carrell, J., Sakar, P., & Feng, S. (2013). Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecological Indicators, 24, 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellens, K., Dewulf, W., Overcash, M., Hauschild, M., & Duflou, J. (2012). Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (UPLCI) CO2PE! Initiative part1: Methodology description. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohavi, R., Rothleder, N., & Simoudis, E. (2002). Emerging trends in business analytics. Communications of the ACM, 45(8), 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotsiantis, S., Kanellopoulos, D., & Pintelas, P. (2006). Data preprocessing for supervised leaning. International Journal of Computer Science, 1(2), 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraguru, S., Rachuri, S., & Lechevalier, D. (2014). Faceted classification of manufacturing processes for sustainability performance evaluation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75(9–12), 1309–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuram, E., Ozcelik, B., Bayramoglu, M., Demirbas, E., & Simsek, B. (2013). Optimization of cutting fluids and cutting parameters during end milling by using D-optimal design of experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, C., & Pang, C. (2013). An energy data-driven decision support system for high-performance manufacturing industries. International Journal of Automation and Logistics, 1(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Q., Wang, H., & Song, Y. (2014). Hybrid knowledge model of process planning and its green extension. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0928-1.

  • Leng, J., Jiang, P., & Ding, K. (2014). Implementing of a three-phase integrated decision support model for parts machining outsourcing. International Journal of Production Research, 52(12), 3614–3636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., Tang, Y., Cui, L., & Li, P. (2013a). A quantitative approach to analyze carbon emissions of CNC-based machining systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

  • Li, L., Liu, F., Chen, B., & Li, C. (2013b). Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in sculptured parts machining based on neural network. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

  • Madan, J., Mani, M., & Lyons, K. (2013). Characterizing energy consumption of the injection molding process. In Proceedings of the ASME 2013 international manufacturing science and engineering conference.

  • OECD. (2009). Sustainable manufacturing and eco-innovation—Framework, practices and measurement. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/43423689.pdf. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Accessed Jan 2014.

  • OMG. (2007). OMG unified modeling language -superstructure. Object Management Group. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.4.1/Superstructure/PDF/. Accessed Feb 2014.

  • Rao, S. (2009). Engineering optimization: Theory and practice. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, C. (2010). A complete framework for verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification in scientific comuting. In Proceedings of 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting.

  • Shao, G., Brodsky, A., Shin, S., & Kim, D. (2014). Decision guidance methodology for sustainable manufacturing using process analytics formalism. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0995-3.

  • Shin, S. (2010). Development of a framework for green productivity enhancement and its application to machining system. Ph. D. Dissertation. POSTECH.

  • Shin, S., Woo, J., & Rachuri, S. (2014). Predictive analytics model for power consumption in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 15, 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shvachko, K., Kuang, H., Radia, S., & Chansler, R. (2010). The hadoop distributed file system. In Proceedings of IEEE mass storage Sys & Tech.

  • Taha, Z., & Rostam, S. (2012). A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 2137–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinodh, S., Jayakrishna, K., Kumar, V., & Dutta, R. (2014). Development of decision support system for sustainability evaluation: A case study. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(1), 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitanov, V., Tjahjono, B., & Marghalany, I. (2007). A decision support tool to facilitate the design of cellular manufacturing layouts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52, 380–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wazed, M., Ahmed, S., & Yusoff, N. (2009). Uncertainty factors in real manufacturing environment. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(2), 342–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M., Li, W., Kara, S., & Herrmann, C. (2013). Determining optimal process parameters to increase the eco-efficiency of grinding processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66(1), 644–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yam, R., Tse, P., Li, L., & Tu, P. (2001). Intelligent predictive decision support system for condition-based maintenance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 17, 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurdakul, M., Arslan, E., Tansel, Y., & Turkbas, O. (2014). A decision support system for selection of net-shape primary manufacturing processes. International Journal of Production Research, 52(5), 1528–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeballos, L. (2010). A constraint programming approach to tool allocation and production scheduling in flexible manufacturing systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26, 725–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Lujia, F., Mayyas, A., Omar, M., Al-Hammadi, Y., & Saleh, S. (2014). Production energy optimization using low dynamic programming, a decision support tool for sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.066.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Abdullah Alrazgan, a graduate student from George Mason University, for his effort on SPAF compiler development. The work represented here was partially funded through cooperative agreement #70NANB12H277 between George Mason University and NIST.

Conflict of interest No approval or endorsement of any commercial product by the National Institute of Standards and Technology is intended or implied. Certain commercial software systems are identified in this paper to facilitate understanding. Such identification does not imply that these software systems are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duck Bong Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, SJ., Kim, D.B., Shao, G. et al. Developing a decision support system for improving sustainability performance of manufacturing processes. J Intell Manuf 28, 1421–1440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1059-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1059-z

Keywords

Navigation