Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

POLCA system for supply chain management: simulation in the automotive industry

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to explain how the paired-cell overlapping loops of cards with authorisation (POLCA) system can be an efficient practice to coordinate the production flow in supply chains (SCs). For this purpose, it describes a case study using POLCA between connections in an automobile industry SC. For adequate functioning of the POLCA system, it is proposed the combined use of such system with electronic data interchange and just in sequence. The methodology used in this research was the Case Study. Thus, a proposal was developed based on literature and field research. After that, the proposal has been validated through simulation. The simulation shown in the present study reveals that the proposal has the potential to allow the company maintaining its supply with a significant inventory reduction, therefore with a better production flow coordination with its dashboard supplier. The paper revealed a new and very promising mechanism for a company coordinates its production flow: the POLCA/EDI/JIS logic. This research has shown that POLCA system logic can also be used to coordinate the production flow between a company and its suppliers. To the best of our knowledge, any paper in literature presented this use for the POLCA system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Mudimigh, A. S., Zairi, M., & Ahmed, A. M. M. (2004). Extending the concept of supply chain: The effective management of value chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 309–320. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, M. H., Bohez, E. L. J., Pisuchpen, R., & Parnichkun, M. (2013). Petri Net model of repetitive push manufacturing with Polca to minimise value-added WIP. International Journal of Production Research, 51(15), 4464–4483. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.765073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baysan, S., Kabadurmus, O., & Durmusoglu, M. B. (2007). Economic analysis of POLCA system design via simulation: A multi-cell manufacturing case study. In Proceedings of 37th International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt.

  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386. doi:10.2307/248684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen, N., Scholl, A., & Woppere, N. (2012). Resequencing of mixed-model assembly lines: Survey and research agenda. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(3), 594–604. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braglia, M., Castellano, D., & Frosolini, M. (2014). Optimization of POLCA-controlled production systems with a simulation-driven genetic algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70(1–4), 385–395. doi:10.1007/s00170-013-5282-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braglia, M., Castellano, D., & Frosolini, M. (2015). A study on the importance of selection rules within unbalanced MTO POLCA-controlled production systems. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 20(4), 457–468. doi:10.1504/IJISE.2015.070182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., & Roath, A. S. (2009). Defining and operationalizing supply chain integration. Journal of Business Logistics, 30(1), 63–84. doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2009.tb00099.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R., & Tu, M. (2009). Development of an agent-based system for manufacturing control and coordination with ontology and RFID technology. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7581–7593. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M., & Juttner, U. (2000). Supply chain relationships: Making the transition to closer integration. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: A Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management, 3(1), 5–23. doi:10.1080/13675560050006646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crum, M. R., Johnson, D. A., & Allen, B. (1998). A longitudinal assessment of EDI use in the US motor carrier industry. Transportation Journal, 38(1), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSCMP-Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. (2016). Supply Chain Management Definitions. Accessed February, 14. http://cscmp.org/aboutcscmp/definitions.asp.

  • Dubois, A., & Araujo, L. (2007). Case research in purchasing and supply management: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 13(3), 170–181. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2007.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008a). A three-stage implementation model for supply chain collaboration. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 93–112. doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2008.tb00070.x.

  • Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008b). Benefits, barriers and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(1), 35–48. doi:10.1108/13598540810850300.

  • Fawcett, S. E., McCarter, M. W., Fawcett, A. M., Webb, G. S., & Magnan, G. M. (2015). Why supply chain collaboration fails: The socio-structural view of resistance to relational strategies. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), 648–663. doi:10.1108/SCM-08-2015-0331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, N. O., & Carmo-Silva, S. (2006). Generic POLCA—a production and materials flow control mechanism for quick response manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(1), 74–84. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugate, B., Sahin, F., & Mentzer, J. T. (2005). Supply chain management coordination mechanisms. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 129–162. doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2006.tb00220.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germs, R., & Riezebos, J. (2010). Workload balancing capability of pull systems in MTO production. International Journal of Production Research, 48(8), 2345–2360. doi:10.1080/00207540902814314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsby, T. J., & García-Dastugue, S. J. (2003). The manufacturing flow management process. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 14(2), 33–52. doi:10.1108/09574090310806585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-R, P. L., Framinan, J. M., & Pierreval, H. (2012). Token-based pull production control systems: An introductory overview. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(1), 5–22. doi:10.1007/s10845-011-0534-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halldórsson, A., Hsuan, J., & Kotzab, H. (2015). Complementary theories to supply chain management revisited—from borrowing theories to theorizing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(6), 574–586. doi:10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, J., & Kanet, J. J. (2013). Applying work flow control in make-to-order job shops. International Journal of Production Economics, 143(2), 620–626. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. A., & Scudder, G. D. (2002). The use of electronic data interchange for supply chain coordination in the food industry. Journal of Operations Management, 20(4), 375–387. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00017-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2004). To pull or not to pull: What is the question? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 6(2), 133–148. doi:10.1287/msom.1030.0028.

  • Hüttmeir, A., Treville, S., Ackere, A. A., Monnier, L., & Prenninger, J. (2009). Trading off between heijunka and just-in-sequence. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(2), 501–507. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabadurmus, O. (2009). A comparative study of POLCA and generic CONWIP production control systems in erratic demand conditions. In Proceedings of IIE Lean Division—Lean Student Paper Competition, Auburn, USA.

  • Khilwani, N., Ulutas, B. H., & Islier, A. A. (2011). A methodology to design virtual cellular manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 22(4), 533–544. doi:10.1007/s10845-009-0314-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B. G., & Lee, S. (2008). Factors affecting the implementation of electronic data interchange in Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 263–283. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, A., & Suri, R. (2009). Planning and implementing POLCA: A card-based control system for high variety or custom engineered products. Production Planning & Control, 20(7), 596–610. doi:10.1080/09537280903034297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy, A., Suri, R., & Vernon, M. K. (2000). A new approach for analyzing queueing models of material control strategies in manufacturing systems. In Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on Queueing Networks with Finite Capacity (QNETs2000), Ilkley, West Yorkshire, UK, July 20–21.

  • Lage Junior, M., & Godinho Filho, M. (2010). Variations of kanban system: Literature review and classification. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(1), 13–21. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, D. M. (2008). Supply chain management: Process, partnerships, performance. Florida: SCMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune, M. A., & Yakova, N. (2005). On characterizing the 4 C’s in supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 23(1), 81–100. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D., & Palvia, P. C. (2001). EDI in strategic supply chain: Impact on customer service. International Journal of Information Management, 21(3), 193–211. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(01)00010-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lödding, H., Yu, K. W., & Wiendahl, H. P. (2003). Decentralized WIP-oriented manufacturing control (DEWIP). Production Planning and Control, 14(1), 42–54. doi:10.1080/0953728021000078701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan, S., Jia, G., & Kong, J. (2012). A mathematical programming formulation approach to the number of POLCA cards. In Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, ICMSE (pp. 218–222).

  • Luan, S., Jia, G., & Kong, J. (2013). A model approach to POLCA system for quick response manufacturing. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 9(3), 1167–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., et al. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25. doi:10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J. (1998). Building operations management theory through case and field research. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 441–454. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00023-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakano, M., Akikawa, T., & Shimazu, M. (2013). Process integration mechanisms in internal supply chains: Case studies from a dynamic resource-based view. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: A Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management, 16(4), 328–347. doi:10.1080/13675567.2013.813919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourelfath, M. (2006). Analytical results on the evaluation of the lead time and the fill rate of unreliable production systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2006.

  • Oliva, R., & Watson, N. (2011). Cross-functional alignment in supply chain planning: A case study of sales and operations planning. Journal of Operations Management, 29(5), 434–448. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, N. J., Rhoads, J. F., & Kim, S. (2012). The effects of RFID and EDI technologies on supply chain dynamics. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation, 32(1), 10–17. doi:10.2316/Journal.205.2012.1.205-5539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riezebos, J. (2006). Polca simulation of a unidirectional flow system. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Group Technology/Cellular Manufacturing, Groningen, The Netherlands, July 3–5.

  • Riezebos, J. (2010). Design of POLCA material control systems. International Journal of Production Research, 48(5), 1455–1477. doi:10.1080/00207540802570677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, F., & Robinson, E. P. (2002). Flow coordination and information sharing in supply chains: Review, implications, and directions for future research. Decision Sciences, 33(4), 505–536. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01654.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakhardande, R. (2011). A performance comparison between kanban and CONWIP through simulation. In Proceedings of 61st Annual IIE Conference and Expo Proceedings.

  • Satoglu, S. I., Ucan, K. (2015). Redesigning the material supply system of the automotive suppliers based on lean principles and an application. In Proceedings of International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM).

  • Stevenson, M., Hendry, L. C., & Kingsman, B. G. (2005). A review of production planning and control: The applicability of key concepts to the make-to-order industry. International Journal of Production Research, 43(1), 869–898. doi:10.1080/0020754042000298520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., & Samson, D. (2002). Effective case research in operations management: A process perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 419–433. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00022-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stump, B., & Badurdeen, F. (2012). Integrating lean and other strategies for mass customization manufacturing: A case study. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(1), 109–124. doi:10.1007/s10845-009-0289-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R. (1998). Quick response manufacturing: A companywide approach to reducing lead times. Portland: Productivity Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R. (2003). QRM and POLCA: A winning combination for manufacturing enterprises in the 21st century. Technical Report Center for Quick Response Manufacturing, May. https://qrm.engr.wisc.edu/index.php/research/downloads?download=1:qrm-and-polca-a-winning-combination-for-manufacturing-enterprises-in-the-21st-century.

  • Suri, R. (2005). A lean strategy for job shops. Gear Technology. The Journal of Gear Manufacturing, Nov–Dec. http://www.geartechnology.com/articles/1105/A_Lean_Strategy_for_Job_Shops.

  • Suri, R. (2010). It’s about time: The competitive advantage of quick response manufacturing. New York: Productivity Press. doi:10.1201/EBK1439805954.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R., & Krishnamurthy, A. (2003). How to plan and implement POLCA: A material control system for high-variety or custom-engineered products. Technical Report Center for Quick Response Manufacturing, May. http://www.meteconline.org/resources/S0600257_POLCA.pdf.

  • Suri, R., & Shinde, R. (2004). Setting card levels for a multiproduct jobshop using mean value analysis. In Proceedings of IIE Annual Conference and Exhibition (p. 2323).

  • Tatoglu, E., Bayraktar, E., Golgeci, I., Lenny Koh, S. C., Demirbag, M., et al. (2016). How do supply chain management and information systems practices influence operational performance? Evidence from emerging country SMEs. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: A Leading Journal of Supply Chain Management, 19(3), 181–199. doi:10.1080/13675567.2015.1065802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Landeghem, H., De Cock, K., Declerck, F., & Verdegem, P. (2011). Comparing the performance of POLCA and load-based order release shop floor control methods using simulation. In Proceedings of 9th Industrial Simulation Conference, ISC (pp. 250–254).

  • Vandaele, N., & De Boeck, L. (2003). Advanced resource planning. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(1–2), 211–218. doi:10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00081-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandaele, N., Nieuwenhuyse, I. V., Claerhout, D., & Cremmery, R. (2005). E-POLCA to control multi-product, multimachine job shops. Working paper University of Antwerp, January. http://www.ua.ac.be/download.aspx?c=*TEWHI&n=23608&ct=023227&e=61247.

  • Vandaele, N., Nieuwenhuyse, I. V., Claerhout, D., & Cremmery, R. (2008). Load-based POLCA: An integrated material control system for multiproduct, multimachine job shops. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(2), 181–197. doi:10.1287/msom.1070.0174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M., & Silveira-Camargos, V. (2012). Managing risks in just-in-sequence supply networks: Exploratory evidence from automakers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 52–64. doi:10.1109/TEM.2010.2087762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, S., Kellner, M., Schenk, E., & Weigert, G. (2003). Just-in-sequence material supply—a simulation based solution in electronics production. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 19(1–2), 107–111. doi:10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00067-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziengs, N., Riezebos, J., & Germs, R. (2012). Placement of effective work-in-progress limits in route-specific unit-based pull systems. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4358–4371. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.590537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Federal University of Goiás (UFG) (Grant No. ID0EMSAG1561), Foundation for Research Support of the State of Goiás (Grant No. ID0EQZAG1562) and National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (Grant No. ID0EWABG1563).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science and Technology (FCT), Campus Aparecida de Goiânia (CAP), Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) - Regional Goiânia, Rua Mucuri, S/N Área 03, Conde dos Arcos, Aparecida de Goiânia, Goiás CEP, 74968-755, Brazil

    Maico Roris Severino

  2. Departament of Industrial Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil

    Moacir Godinho Filho

Authors
  1. Maico Roris Severino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Moacir Godinho Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maico Roris Severino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Severino, M.R., Godinho Filho, M. POLCA system for supply chain management: simulation in the automotive industry. J Intell Manuf 30, 1271–1289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1323-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1323-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation