Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A data-driven method for performance analysis and improvement in production systems with quality inspection

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 September 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

The advance of new generation of IT and sensor technologies results in data enriched production environment. However, there is a lack of an effective utilization of the data to improve productivity while reducing quality management cost. Therefore, this paper proposes a systematic method to analyze the production dynamics, and presents an event-based method to quantitatively evaluate the impact of various disruptions on system throughput, including machine breakdown and quality failure. It is proved that the impact of the events can be measured with system loss which is the summation of the production loss of the slowest machine and the overall number of defective parts produced in the subsystem where the slowest machine locates in. The data-driven method is integrated into an optimization method to exploit the optimal quality inspection allocations. In the method, a non-linear optimization problem is formulated and solved with an adaptive genetic algorithm to trade off the penalty cost of production loss and the investment cost of quality inspection. The research results in a comprehensive understanding of production dynamics subject to quality inspection and rework. It is of critical importance to boost productivity with better quality inspection allocations. Simulation studies are performed to validate the proposed methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Abbreviations

\(L_{h}\) :

The \(h{\text{th}}\) subsystem in the production system, \(1 \le h \le N\)

\(n_{h} \) :

The number of machines in the \(h{\text{th}}\) subsystem, \(1 \le h \le N\)

\(m_{j}^{h} \) :

The \(j{\text{th}}\) machine in the \(h{\text{th}}\) subsystem, \(1 \le h \le N, 1 \le j \le n_{h}\)

\(v_{j}^{h} \) :

The rated speed of machine \(m_{j}^{h}\)

\(v_{j}^{h} \left( t \right)\) :

The instantaneous speed of machine \(m_{j}^{h}\) at time \(t\)

\({\Lambda }_{j}^{h} \left( t \right) \) :

The state of machine \(m_{j}^{h}\) at time \(t\)

\(X_{j}^{h} \left( t \right)\) :

The accumulated production count of machine \(m_{j}^{h}\) during \(\left( {0,t} \right]\)

\(B_{i}^{h}\) :

The ith buffer in the hth subsystem, \(1 \le h \le N, 0 \le i \le n_{h}\)

\(\psi_{i}^{h} \) :

The capacity of buffer \(B_{i}^{h}\)

\(\omega_{i}^{h} \left( t \right)\) :

The buffer level of buffer \(B_{i}^{h}\). It is the number of parts in buffer \(B_{i}^{h}\) at time \(t\)

\(\vec{\vartheta }_{k} = \left( {m_{j}^{h} ,t_{k} ,d_{k} } \right)\) :

The kth machine breakdown event

\(\vec{\Theta } = \left[ {\vec{\vartheta }_{1} , \ldots ,\vec{\vartheta }_{K} } \right] \) :

A sequence of breakdown events, \( 0 < t_{1} \le t_{2} \le \ldots \le t_{K}\)

\(\vec{\varsigma }_{r} = \left( {L_{h} ,t_{r} ,d_{r} } \right)\) :

The rth quality failure event

\(\vec{\sigma } = \left[ { \vec{\varsigma }_{1} , \ldots , \vec{\varsigma }_{R} } \right] \) :

A sequence of quality failure events, \( 0 < t_{1} \le t_{2} \le \ldots \le t_{R}\)

\(\vec{\sigma }^{{h^{*} }} = \left[ {\vec{\varsigma }_{1}^{{h^{*} }} , \ldots , \vec{\varsigma }_{w}^{{h^{*} }} } \right] \) :

A set of quality failure events that happen at subsystem \({ }L_{{h^{*} }}\), \(1 \le w \le R\)

References

  • Bettayeb, B., Brahimi, N., & Lemoine, D. (2018). Integrated dynamic single item lot-sizing and quality inspection planning. International Journal of Production Research, 56(7), 2611–2627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Q., Biller, S., & Xiao, G. (2010). Transient analysis of downtimes and bottleneck dynamics in serial manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 132(5), 051015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. C. (2013). An optimal production and inspection strategy with preventive maintenance error and rework. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(1), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foumani, M., Gunawan, I., & Smith-Miles, K. (2015). Resolution of deadlocks in a robotic cell scheduling problem with post-process inspection system: Avoidance and recovery scenarios. In: IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pages: 1107–1111, Bangkok, Thailand.

  • Foumani, M., Smith-Miles, K., & Gunawan, I. (2017a). Scheduling of two-machine robotic rework cells: In-process, post-process and in-line inspection scenarios. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 91, 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foumani, M., Smith-Miles, K., Gunawan, I., & Moeini, A. (2017b). A framework for stochastic scheduling of two-machine robotic rework cells with in-process inspection system. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 112, 492–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foumani, M., Razeghi, A., & Smith-Miles, K. (2020). Stochastic optimization of two-machine flow shop robotic cells with controllable inspection times: From theory toward practice. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 61, 101822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Galetto, M., & Maisano, D. (2006). Classification of performance and quality indicators in manufacturing. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 2(3), 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, F., Li, J., Xiao, G., Arinez, J., & Deng, W. (2015). Modeling, analysis, and improvement of integrated productivity and quality system in battery manufacturing. IIE Transactions, 47(12), 1313–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadem, M., Ali, S. A., & Seifoddini, H. (2008). Efficacy of lean metrics in evaluating the performance of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 15(2), 176–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khayyati, S., & Tan, B. (2020). Data-driven control of a production system by using marking-dependent threshold policy. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 107607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Y., Jia, F., Lin, J., Xing, S., & Ding, S. X. (2016). An intelligent fault diagnosis method using unsupervised feature learning towards mechanical big data. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(5), 3137–3147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Chang, Q., & Ni, J. (2009). Data driven bottleneck detection of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 47(18), 5019–5036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Wu, M., Liu, X., Cheng, Y., & Yu, Y. (2017). The prediction of surface roughness of PCBN turning GH4169 based on adaptive genetic algorithm. Integrated Ferroelectrics, 180(1), 118–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Zhang, W., & Ding, Q. (2018). A robust intelligent fault diagnosis method for rolling element bearings based on deep distance metric learning. Neurocomputing, 310, 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Jia, X., Yang, Q., & Lee, J. (2020). Quality analysis in metal additive manufacturing with deep learning. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31, 2003–2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Chang, Q., Xiao, G., & Arinez, J. (2015). Data-driven analysis of downtime impacts in parallel production systems. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 12(4), 1541–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Wang, J. Q., & Chang, Q. (2019). Event-based production control for energy efficiency improvement in sustainable multistage manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 141(2), 021006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., Zhang, H., Leng, J., & Chen, X. (2019). Digital twin-driven rapid individualised designing of automated flow-shop manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, 57(20), 3903–3919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modern quality control with SPC. (2018). Solving scrap: Focus on quality management to achieve dramatic savings. Retrieved November 15, 2020, from https://www.qualitymag.com/articles/95104-solving-scrap-focus-on-quality-management-to-achieve-dramatic-savings

  • Ouzineb, M., Mhada, F. Z., Pellerin, R., & El Hallaoui, I. (2018). Optimal planning of buffer sizes and inspection station positions. Production and Manufacturing Research, 6(1), 90–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radhoui, M., Rezg, N., & Chelbi, A. (2010). Joint quality control and preventive maintenance strategy for imperfect production processes. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21(2), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau, H., Chu, Y. H., & Cho, K. H. (2005). Layer modelling for the inspection allocation problem in re-entrant production systems. International Journal of Production Research, 43(17), 3633–3655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei-Malek, M., Mohammadi, M., Dantan, J. Y., Siadat, A., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. (2019). A review on optimisation of part quality inspection planning in a multi-stage manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15–16), 4880–4897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, B., & Saren, S. (2016). Product inspection policy for an imperfect production system with inspection errors and warranty cost. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(1), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shetwan, A. G., Vitanov, V. I., & Tjahjono, B. (2011). Allocation of quality control stations in multistage manufacturing systems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 60(4), 473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemiatkowski, M., & Przybylski, W. (2006). Simulation studies of process flow with in-line part inspection in machining cells. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 171(1), 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderberg, R., Wärmefjord, K., Carlson, J. S., & Lindkvist, L. (2017). Toward a digital twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Annals, 66(1), 137–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, M., & Patnaik, L. M. (1994). Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24(4), 656–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekin, S., & Andradóttir, S. (2020). Inspection location in capacity-constrained lines. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 28, 905–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. C., & Wang, C. H. (2011). Economic optimization for an off-line inspection, disposition and rework model. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 61(3), 891–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Volsem, S., Dullaert, W., & Van Landeghem, H. (2007). An evolutionary algorithm and discrete event simulation for optimizing inspection strategies for multi-stage processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(3), 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. (2011). Robust data-driven modeling approach for real-time final product quality prediction in batch process operation. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 7(2), 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Li, J., Arinez, J., & Biller, S. (2013). Quality bottleneck transitions in flexible manufacturing systems with batch productions. IIE Transactions, 45(2), 190–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuest, T., Irgens, C., & Thoben, K. D. (2014). An approach to monitoring quality in manufacturing using supervised machine learning on product state data. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25(5), 1167–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J., & Yin, Y. (2010). Assembly line balancing based on an adaptive genetic algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 48(1–4), 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Li, X., & Ding, Q. (2019). Deep residual learning-based fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery. ISA Transactions, 95, 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F., Xu, X., & Xie, S. Q. (2009). Computer-aided inspection planning—The state of the art. Computers in Industry, 60(7), 453–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, J., Chang, Q., Arinez, J., Xiao, G., & Lei, Y. (2017). Dynamic production system diagnosis and prognosis using model-based data-driven method. Expert Systems with Applications, 80, 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which have significantly improved the quality of this work.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2019YFB1703800); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52075453 and 71931007); and the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (No. 2019ZG053001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: A formula under the header ‘An event-based modelling method’ has been corrected.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, JQ., Song, YL., Cui, PH. et al. A data-driven method for performance analysis and improvement in production systems with quality inspection. J Intell Manuf 34, 455–469 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01780-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01780-5

Keywords

Navigation