Skip to main content
Log in

Decentralized Guidance Control of UAVs with Explicit Optimization of Communication

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We design a decentralized guidance control method for autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) tracking multiple targets. We formulate this guidance control problem as a decentralized partially observable Markov decision process (Dec-POMDP). As in the case of partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP), it is intractable to solve a Dec-POMDP exactly. So, we extend a POMDP approximation method called nominal belief-state optimization (NBO) to solve our control problem posed as a Dec-POMDP. We incorporate the cost of communication into the objective function of the Dec-POMDP, i.e., we explicitly optimize the communication among the UAVs at the network level along with the kinematic control commands for the UAVs. We measure the performance of our method with the following metrics: 1) average target-location error, and 2) average communication cost. The goal to maximize the performance with respect to each of the above metrics conflict with each other, and we show through empirical study how to trade off between these performance metrics using a scalar parameter. The NBO method induces coordination among the UAVs even though the system is decentralized. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this coordination, we compare our Dec-POMDP approach with a greedy approach (a noncooperative approach), where the UAVs do not communicate with each other and each UAV optimizes only its local kinematic controls. Furthermore, we compare the performance of our approach of optimizing the communication between the UAVs with a fixed communication scheme—where only the UAV kinematic controls are optimized with an underlying fixed (non-optimized) communication scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller, S.A., Harris, Z.A., Chong, E.K.P.: A POMDP framework for coordinated guidance of autonomous UAVs for multitarget tracking. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2009, 724597 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ragi, S., Chong, E.K.P.: Dynamic UAV path planning for multitargte tracking. In: Proc. 2012 American Control Conference, pp. 3845–3850. Montreal, QC (2012)

  3. Min, H., Sun, F., Niu, F.: Decentralized UAV formation tracking flight control using gyroscopic force. In: Proc. International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications (CISMA 2009), pp. 91–96. Hong Kong (2009)

  4. Rezaee, H., Abdollahi, F.: A synchronization strategy for three dimensional decentralized formation control of unmanned aircrafts. In: Proc. 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp. 462–467. Melbourne, Australia (2011)

  5. Yang, Y., Minai, A.A., Polycarpou, M.M.: Decentralized cooperative search by networked UAVs in an uncertain environment. In: Proc. 2004 American Control Conference, pp. 5558–5563. Boston, MA (2004)

  6. Richards, A., How, J.: Decentralized model predictive control of cooperating UAVs. In: Proc. 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4286–4291. Atlantis, Paradise Island (2004)

  7. Alighanbari, M., How, J.P.: Decentralized task assignment for unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Proc. 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and European Control Conference 2005, pp. 5668–5673. Seville, Spain (2005)

  8. Ghaffarkhah, A., Mostofi, Y.: Communication-aware motion planning in mobile networks. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 56, 2478–2485 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernstein, D.S., Givan, R., Immerman, N., Zilberstein, S.: The complexity of decentralized control of markov decision processes. Math. Oper. Res. 27, 819–840 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bar-Shalom, Y., Li, X.R., Kirubarajan, T.: Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation. Wiley-Interscience, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackman, S., Popoli, R.: Design and Analysis of Modern Tracking Systems. Artech House, Boston (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellman, R.: Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chong, E.K.P., Kreucher, C., III, A.O.H.: Partially observable markov decision process approximations for adaptive sensing. Disc. Event Dyn. Sys. 19(3), 377–422 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shankarachary Ragi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ragi, S., Chong, E.K.P. Decentralized Guidance Control of UAVs with Explicit Optimization of Communication. J Intell Robot Syst 73, 811–822 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-9904-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-9904-9

Keywords

Navigation