Skip to main content
Log in

The Target Differential Game with Two Defenders

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cooperative aircraft differential game where an Attacker missile pursues an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) herein called the Target is addressed. The Target UAV cooperates with up to two Defender missiles which are launched in order to intercept the Attacker before the latter reaches the Target. This is a scenario with important military applications where each one of the agents is an autonomous air vehicle. Each agent plans and corrects its course of action in order to defeat an opposing force while simultaneously optimizing an operational relevant cost/payoff performance measure. The Target and the Defenders cooperate to form a team against the Attacker. The results in this paper build on the solution of a three agent differential game, where the three players are the Target, the Attacker, and one Defender; in this paper, the benefits of firing a second Defender are considered. Indeed, launching two interceptor missiles is a standard procedure by providing redundant backup. Building on the solution of the one-Defender problem, it is possible to address a seemingly intractable problem, where the Target needs to decide which Defender(s) to cooperate with, in addition to obtaining the optimal headings of every player in the game. Given the initial positions of the players, we solve the problem of determining if a second Defender improves the Target/Defender(s) payoff and provide the optimal strategies for each of the agents involved. Finally, we address the game of kind (for the case of one Defender) which provides the safety regions to determine which side will win based on the initial state. These safety regions provides the Target’s area of vulnerability, and using these results, we describe the reduction to the Target’s vulnerability area brought by an additional Defender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakolas, E., Tsiotras, P.: Optimal pursuit of moving targets using dynamic Voronoi diagrams 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 7431–7436 (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Basar, T., Olsder, G.J.: Dynamic noncooperative game theory Classics in Applied Mathemetics, vol. 23. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casbeer, D.W., Garcia, E., Pachter, M.: The target differential game with two defenders International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Earl, M.G., D’Andrea, R.: A decomposition approach to multi-vehicle cooperative control. Robot. Auton. Syst. 55(4), 276–291 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fuchs, Z.E., Khargonekar, P.P., Evers, J.: Cooperative defense within a single-pursuer, two-evader pursuit evasion differential game 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 3091–3097 (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganebny, S.A., Kumkov, S.S., Le Ménec, S., Patsko, V.S.: Model problem in a line with two pursuers and one evader. Dyn. Games Appl. 2(2), 228–257 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Fuchs, Z.E., Pachter, M.: Aircraft defense differential game with non-zero capture radius 20th IFAC World Congress (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pachter, M.: Active target defense differential game with fast defender American Control Conference, pp 3752–3757 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pachter, M.: Cooperative strategies for optimal aircraft defense from an attacking missile. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 38(8), 1510–1520 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pachter, M.: Escape regions of the active target defense differential game ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pham, K., Pachter, M.: Cooperative aircraft defense from an attacking missile 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 2926–2931 (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W., Pham, K., Pachter, M.: Cooperative aircraft defense from an attacking missile using proportional navigation AIAA Guidence, Navigation, and Control Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, H., Zhang, W., Ding, J., Stipanovic, D.M., Tomlin, C.J.: Guaranteed decentralized pursuit-evasion in the plane with multiple pursuers 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference, pp 4835–4840 (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Isaacs, R.: Differential Games. Wiley, New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pachter, M., Garcia, E., Casbeer, D.W.: Active target defense differential game 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing, pp 46–53 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Perelman, A., Shima, T., Rusnak, I.: Cooperative differential games strategies for active aircraft protection from a homing missile. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(3), 761–773 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pham, K.: Risk-averse based paradigms for uncertainty forecast and management in differential games of persistent disruptions and denials American Control Conference, pp 842–849 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prokopov, O., Shima, T.: Linear quadratic optimal cooperative strategies for active aircraft protection. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 36(3), 753–764 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ratnoo, A., Shima, T.: Line-of-sight interceptor guidance for defending an aircraft. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(2), 522–532 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ratnoo, A., Shima, T.: Guidance strategies against defended aerial targets. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 35(4), 1059–1068 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubinsky, S., Gutman, S.: Three body guaranteed pursuit and evasion AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp 1–24 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rubinsky, S., Gutman, S.: Three-player pursuit and evasion conflict. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 37 (1), 98–110 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rusnak, I.: The lady, the bandits, and the bodyguards–a two team dynamic game 16th IFAC World Congress, pp. 441–446 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rusnak, I., Weiss, H., Hexner, G.: Guidance laws in target-missile-defender scenario with an aggressive defender 18th IFAC World Congress, pp 9349–9354 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scott, W., Leonard, N.E.: Pursuit, herding and evasion: a three-agent model of caribou predation American Control Conference, pp 2978–2983 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shaferman, V., Shima, T.: Cooperative multiple-model adaptive guidance for an aircraft defending missile. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 33(6), 1801–1813 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shima, T.: Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 34(2), 414–425 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamasaki, T., Balakrishnan, S.N.: Triangle intercept guidance for aerial defense AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yamasaki, T., Balakrishnan, S.N., Takano, H.: Modified command to line-of-sight intercept guidance for aircraft defense. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 36(3), 898–902 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Tamer Basar for the fruitful conversations leading to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Casbeer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Casbeer, D.W., Garcia, E. & Pachter, M. The Target Differential Game with Two Defenders. J Intell Robot Syst 89, 87–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0563-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-017-0563-0

Keywords

Navigation