Skip to main content
Log in

Head-synced Drone Control for Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Controlling a drone using head-mounted display induces virtual reality (VR) sickness. From previous research, it is known that angular velocity is one of the contributing factors to induce VR sickness, however for drones, linear motion and the interaction between linear and angular motion often occur during operation. In this research, we investigate the effect of each conditions experimentally and proposes a method of controlling a drone to reduce VR sickness. We designed a system that does not make user’s head fixed at one point but allows to move the head freely. At the same time, the head orientation and direction are synced with the drone’s attitude to reduce sensory conflict. Two controllers were compared: joystick control and head control. We tested with a real system and conducted experiments on subjects to verify its effect. The proposed controller reduced angular velocity in the frequency range 0.1 to 10 Hz where a vestibular system becomes most sensitive, and it is demonstrated that reducing sensory conflict contributes to the reduction of VR sickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smolyanskiy, N., Gonzalez-Franco, M.: Stereoscopic First Person View System for Drone Navigation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 4, 1–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Higuchi, K., Fujii, K., Rekimoto, J.: Flying head: A head-synchronization mechanism for flying telepresence. International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT), pp. 28–34 (2013)

  3. Zhao, J., Allison, R.S., Vinnikov, M., Jennings, S.: The effects of visual and control latency on piloting a Quadcopter using a head-mounted display. In: Proceedings - 2018 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, SMC 2018, pp. 2972–2979 (2019)

  4. Zimmons, P., Panter, A.: The influence of rendering quality on presence and task performance in a virtual environment. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality, 2003-Janua:293–294 (2003)

  5. Borland, D.: Integrating head and full-body tracking for embodiment in virtual characters. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality, pp. 81–82 (2013)

  6. Carnegie, K., Rhee, T.: Reducing visual discomfort with HMDs using dynamic depth of field. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 35(5), 34–41 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman, D.M., Girshick, A.R., Akeley, K., Banks, M.S.: Vergence–accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J. Vis. 8(3), 33 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kot, T., Novák, P.: Application of virtual reality in teleoperation of the military mobile robotic system TAROS. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 15(1) (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ujike, H, Yokoi, T, Saida, S.: Effects of virtual body motion on visually-induced motion sickness. In: Engineering in medicine and biology society, 2004. IEMBS’04. 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 2399–2402 (2004)

  10. Diels, C., Howarth, P.A.: Frequency characteristics of visually induced motion sickness. Hum. Factors 55 (3), 595–604 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, D., So, R., Kwok, K., Cheung, R.: Visually induced motion sickness after watching scenes oscillating at different frequencies and amplitudes. Proceedings of the international conference on ergonomics & human factors (2012)

  12. Reason, J.T., Brand, J.J.: Motion sickness. Academic Press (1975)

  13. Meiry, JL: The vestibular system and human dynamic space orientation. PhD thesis (1966)

  14. Young, L.R.: The current status of vestibular system models. Automatica 5(3), 369–383 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LaViola, J.J.: A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bull. 32(1), 47–56 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duh, H.B.-L., Parker, D.E., Philips, J.O., Furness, T.A.: Conflicting motion cues to the visual and vestibular self- motion systems around 0.06 Hz evoke simulator sickness. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46(1), 142–153 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lo, W.T., So, R.H.Y.: Cybersickness in the presence of scene rotational movements along different axes. Appl. Ergon. 32(1), 1–14 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura, S.: Vection induced by illusory miniaturization of moving picture. The Journal of University Educational Center 4, 31–38 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Michael, G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness (1993)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kandai Watanabe.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, K., Takahashi, M. Head-synced Drone Control for Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness. J Intell Robot Syst 97, 733–744 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01054-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-019-01054-6

Keywords

Navigation